The Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

Great Essays
Gerrymandering: Good or Bad?
Gerrymandering is the manipulation of boundaries as to favor one party or class. This form of control has gone back and forth between the Democratic and Republican parties. The practice, having been around since the beginning of American politics, has had many negative and positive effects on elections, politics, and parties. In a famous court case, Baker v. Carr, the lack of enforcement of gerrymandering regulation in the states was brought to the attention of the federal courts. Specific states, such as Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Nebraska, have all felt the impact of gerrymandering in different ways. Most recently in the 2016 election, redistricting has continued to play a crucial part in election outcomes. Gerrymandering
…show more content…
“Politicians reacted to the subordinance of traditional redistricting principles to population equality by using population equality as justification to draw non- compact districts that split existing political boundaries” (Altman and McDonald 1185). When politicians realized they could use the revised redistricting criteria to their benefit, a new wave of gerrymandering came to light and the politics of America were changed immensely. In the 1980s, when the popularity of gerrymandering soared, states saw district lines following county lines drop …show more content…
This election came down to the Electoral College vote of each state, which has been skewed and manipulated by gerrymandering throughout history. Soon after winning the election, Donald Trump tweeted, “In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally” (Trump). Donald Trump, the Republican Party candidate, boasted about his election win and claims to have won both the popular vote and the Electoral College vote altogether. This win can be thanked for by the Republican Party, which has spent years redrawing the districts to benefit their party based on the population’s voting habits. This gerrymandering is how Donald Trump won the Electoral

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Baker Vs Carr Case Study

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The cases Baker v. Carr and Shaw v. Reno are considered landmark cases under the Fourteenth Amendments because of the cause of action the cases established. In Baker v. Carr the complainants allege the 1901 statute deprive their equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. Claimants stated that elected representatives neglected to redistrict the seats to take account of the extensive growth and redistribution of the states population therefore violated their votes. In Shaw v. Reno white voters claimed that a new redistricting plan involved a heavily gerrymandered district that connected highways to a high density minority area in order to elect a black representative.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judge Justice (along with the other judges) found that The Legislative Redistricting Board did not take redistricting seriously, but instead they did what they wanted. Another issue that was brought up in the case was the multimember districts in Dallas and Bexar. Representatives in these districts are elected but minorities seem to be underrepresented. The Legislative Redistricting Board had the lines drawn so there could be political success. The decision that was made brought controversy so this case was brought to the U.S. Supreme Court (White v. Regester) in which they agreed with the court’s decision.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Week article “How to rig elections, the legal way”, The week staff describes how parties gain an advantage by redrawing voting districts. This process of redrawing voting districts to favor one’s political party is considered gerrymandering. It creates districts that are irregularly shaped and is a legal process unless it violates the 1965 voting rights act which makes it illegal to redistrict based off of minority voters. Gerrymandering has been successful in recent years because in 2012 gerrymandered states such as Pennsylvania won 49% of the vote and took 72% of house seats. Redistricting is overseen by whoever controls the state legislature and happens every ten years with data collected from the recent census.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A state is either for the republican candidate or the democratic candidate. The votes could be forty eight percent for the republican candidate and fifty two percent for the democratic candidate and the democrat would take the state and all the electors for that state. And a lot of states, such as California and Texas are always voting the same way. But if you look at popular vote, is a much more mixed view of things. More than four and a half million Californians voted for McCain (roughly as many votes as he got in Texas), while about forty percent of voters in Alabama backed…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reporter Ronald Brownstein argues that there are four quadrants of Congress. Brownstein adheres to the idea that demographic factors that go beyond region play a powerful role in shaping each party’s representation in the House. The four quadrants of Congress, which include districts that have high levels of racial minorities and of educated whites, districts with high minority levels and low levels of white education, districts that have low minority levels and high white education levels, and districts with low minority levels and low white education, shape the impact of demography on parties in the House. The Democrats’ two greatest demographic strengths are the racial minorities and well-educated whites. While the Democrats drawing their…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the United States reapportionment and redistricting are both processes for deciding voting lines. Reapportionment is the process of reassessing the amount of congressional house seats for each state. Reapportionment is conducted through a census. This takes place every ten years, during which every person, citizen or not, is counted in each state. The process also decides the amount of votes each state gets for the electoral College.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to states because they can be able to become more important if they receive more representatives. Define congressional redistricting. Congressional redistricting is when a state has more representatives rather than districts so they redraw the border. Explain two goals of politicians when they gerrymander during redistricting.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Wisconsin gerrymander of 2011-12 is another example of a time when gerrymandering was carried a little too far. The ratio of Republican to Democrat representatives in the State Assembly was dramatically increased. For anyone siding with the Republicans, this could be considered a victory. Considering the situation from the angle of an impartial citizen, neither party “wins,” because individuals are gradually losing their influence in American politics. Objectively, one can see that gerrymandering is no better than an extremely overlooked form of legal voting…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the case “Davidson v. City of Cranston” the City of Cranston, Rhode Island counted inmates as part of the total population when conceiting district lines, causing prison gerrymandering. The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The result of this gerrymandering was an overrepresented Democratic party, inaccurately reflecting the views of our state’s citizens. It’s important to acknowledge that our court’s ruling on this issue has larger implications in the battle against gerrymandering as a whole. Gill v. Whitford 16 U.S. 1161 (2017-18) is another recent case that illustrates why gerrymandering is such a pressing question in our republic. The Republican state legislature in Wisconsin created unfair districts to ensure their majority in 2011. This redistricting resulted in the Wisconsin Republicans obtaining over sixty percent of…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this sense, proponents argue that the process “somehow preserves federalism or small states ' legitimate interests” (Edwards 2005, p. 11). One concern of the democratic process is developing methods for maintaining equal representation across all states despite their size. Imbalances due to the weight given to states, the potential for the winner to lose the popular vote, and disproportionate advantages are all cited as major failures of the Electoral College in adhering to democratic principles. Proponents for direct elections cite these implications as a source of criticism of the current system. The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every four years, citizens of the United States of America choose their next president based off a unique system known as the electoral college. The way that this system works is interesting and is confused easily in the general public. In early November, when citizens go to the polls, they are not voting for the president directly, rather they are voting for their individual states to cast its electoral votes towards a certain presidential candidate. In the forty-eight of the fifty states where voting takes place, all the electoral votes go to the presidential candidate who wins the majority in their state. No matter how large or small the majority is, the presidential candidate gets all the votes.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A law involving gerrymandering was passed in 1967 that banned multimember districts for fear of racism or an unfair advantage to one party (Yglesias). The argument for gerrymandering is that it balances the seats in Congress, half Republican and half Democrat, providing the minority more of a majority in congress. It also provides politicians the ability to safely guarantee the majority in the House does not change because of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays