The Pros And Cons Of Food Control

Improved Essays
Sixty-nine percent of people in the U.S. are overweight. But does that mean the government should control restaurants by severely taxing sugary drinks or limiting the amount of calories a buyer can buy? This has been a very controversial and heated topic. While there are many opinions about whether or not the government should help control people’s diets, the cons of food control clearly outweigh the pros. Government control is an ineffective way to limit the food people buy. It affects those without weight problems just as much as those with weight problems, and it rarely makes change, worsening the issue when it does. Food Control, an unfair government act, hampers the rights of the people, fails to serve its original purpose, and may actually worsen the situation. At first look, government control seems to have some advantages. As obesity rates rise, we need to help limit how much overweight people eat. The government should also deserve control because it costs them more money if people don’t eat healthy, as the government …show more content…
Food control affects those not in the target group, while leaving the overweight unaffected, writes Michael Marlow: “Another government favorite, taxing sugary drinks, does more to shore up government coffers than to reduce obesity. A few studies examined the impact of increasing sugary drinks taxes by 20 percent or more. They find that higher taxes do reduce obesity, but the effect is rather limited. Interestingly, soda taxes mostly cause people without weight problems to cut back their consumption, even though they are not the intended targets of the policy.” Also, the government is prone to lobbyists. In one case, Congress declared pizza a vegetable because of pressure from lobbyists. They blocked attempts from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to replace pizza with something healthier, claiming pizza contains tomato paste, making it a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many consumers also believe that the government cannot infringe their personal right to consume any kind of food they want. This has lead to poor nutrition choices and has caused the obesity epidemic to arise in the first place. According to the authors, marketing is also partly to blame for this epidemic due to their failure to expose the many of the health risks in the food they are selling. With these different proposals and effects in mind, a junk food tax isn’t the most effective solution to combat obesity in America. While the tax might have some effect on the health epidemic, the authors clearly show there needs to be a greater sense of urgency in order to fully resolve the health crisis that is…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Putting 20 percent more tax on fatty and sugary foods will not help the deaths of obese people it will only cause them to spend more money on the things that they want(Archer). Making the healthier foods cheap will not encourage obese people to want or even think about purchasing them. In other words, it 's also unfair to the people that are not obese. No matter if the tax on sugary foods go up and vegtables go down obesity will increase because people will begin to eat LARGE amounts of vegetables and that itself is not health(Archer). Taxing unhealthy foods may seem like a good idea until people start eating LARGE amounts of the “healthy” foods and begin to not be as healthy as expected.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Preservative although bad for one's health are readily available and accessible. Regardless of taxation people will steal eat junk food “Junk food’ taxes are also not guaranteed to reduce overall caloric intake, as some hope. Importantly, fast food consumption (a common target for a "fat tax") may be relatively unresponsive to price changes because individuals may simply switch to other non-taxed, but still energy-dense (lots of calories per serving size) foods”(Esmail)Considering that most desserts are unhealthy it would most likely be taxed. People should not be taxed to attempt to curb the obesity epidemic because healthy people occasionally eat junk food. It is all about moderation not taxation.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Poverty And Obesity

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to Roland Sturm, a senior economist, states “Lowering the costs of healthy foods in supermarkets not only increases the amount of fruits, vegetables and whole grains that people eat, but it also seems to reduce their consumption of less nutritionally desirable foods”. If supermarkets just lower their expenses in fresh vegetables and healthier foods, people would turn to these, instead of food that does not give them the right amount of nutrients that their body needs. This can help the obesity rates to…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Obesity is a huge problem in America, about 90 million people are considered obese. Being obese is when you are severely over weight. Fast food and new technology has made Americans take in more calories than they burn. This is because Americans eat so much and barely exercise. Americans should be forced by the government to cease the regular consumption of fast food because the fast food diet leads to preventable and expensive health issues, such as diabetes, obesity, and heart disease.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They should ban fast food commercials from TV because those are what saturate our society. Kids want to eat anything that is presented to them, and parents allow it because it 's cheaper than to cook at home. Jane E. Brody stated that after Dr. Gortmaker and his team completed their research they came up with the conclusion that ‘ “Marketing of food and beverages is associated with increasing obesity rates and is especially effective among children,” ’ (42). Advertising is one problem, but the prices of these junk foods are also a major problem. In short, the prices for fast food are cheaper than those of healthy restaurants which deters people away from eating healthy.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy of the obesity epidemic is obvious, but it is now more complex due to the proposal of food taxes in the market today. Due to the illogical reasoning of politicians and state legislatures in Congress, Radley Balko, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute has written an article named “What You Eat Is Your Business,” emphasizing that putting taxes on high-calories foods to decrease obesity is unrealistic. Balko argues that the obesity rate is increasing due to the lack of perception in every individual, and that it is a personal matter that government should not be involved in any kind. The only rational way to decrease obesity is by encouraging people to take responsibility for themselves (1). Although, this may appear unpersuasive…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, ignoring the detrimental effects of unhealthy food on our society is what is causing the obesity trend. For these companies helping the general population is just a meaningless waste of money. Others who oppose the required policy changes to combat obesity are certain writers and politicians. While they try to argue many things against food regulation one of their biggest concerns is that regulating food goes against our freedoms and will cost us more money. They believe that the downsides of government regulation outweighs the possible decrease of obesity.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tax To Junk Food Essay

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Nutrition in food is another vast issue that needs to be thought about because it has to do with illnesses and diseases. People who do not have a well-balanced diet, with the nutrients that are needed in their day to day lives, pose a threat to being obese and developing obesity-related illnesses and diseases. Jacobson & Brownell (2000) write that “legislative bodies find it more practical to tax well-recognized categories of food that play little useful role in nutrition. Soft drinks and snack foods typically add unneeded calories to the diet or replace nutritious foods, such as low-fat milk or fruit, without providing significant levels of nutrients” (Jacobson & Brownell, 2000). Therefore, to be able to prevent these diseases from happening, a tax needs to be added to junk foods, to show that those foods should not be bought as much as they currently are because they have no nutritional value in our diets.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Processed food and corporate companies are the main cause behind america 's obesity, from the preservatives to corporate competition it’s a serious problem. One of the issues is the preservatives used to keep the food good. These preservatives are usually salt and it does increase shelf life, but salt isn’t very healthy and lots of it can lead to serious health issues. This might be a evil thing but it is kind of a necessarily evil. To be able to market food to people it needs to have a long shelf life and the only way to do that is to add preservatives.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays