The Pros And Cons Of Federal Campaign Laws

Decent Essays
On the States level, several state legislatures have adopted legislation that would avoid creating the kinds of loopholes that are currently apparent in the federal campaign laws. These laws, however, has been vigorously challenged in the courts. Without clear guidance, some courts have opted to take a precautionary approach, erring on the side of free speech, while other courts have upheld equivalent laws, noting the importance of the government interest in providing the public with adequate disclosure.
Voices are rising now and then, here and there in called for more serious legislative reforms to counter dark money. Some experts already reflagged it, warning that it is the beginning of the whole system transformation from democracy into

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which occurred in 2010, is a standout amongst the most misconstrued U.S. Preeminent Court choices of cutting edge times. A standard, sensible decision, Citizens United by one means or another turned into a lightning bar for revolutionaries, would-be blue pencils and fanatic hacks over the political range. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a point of interest 5-to-4 choices by the United States Supreme Court that corporate financing of independent political programs in hopeful races can't be restricted, on the grounds that doing as such would be in resistance with the First Amendment. The choice came about because of the non-benefit company Citizens United's case under the watchful…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Six Myths about Campaign Money”, Eliza Newlin Carney argues that there are six myths regarding money’s real role in politics, each with a hint of truth. Newlin argues that it is a myth that corporate money will now overwhelm elections because neither unions nor corporations will put vast new resources into campaigns because they could spend their money on politics, through issue advertising with limited constraints, before the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, which ruled that unions and corporations could spend money from their vast treasuries on campaigns. Carney proceeds to argue that the argument that the Citizens United ruling will not affect the campaign finance system is also a myth, because the Court’s decision sets legal precedents which threaten other long-standing aspects of campaign finance and sets a narrow definition of corruption regarding campaign finance, jeopardizing the constitutionality of…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Partisan Gerrymandering is the process legislators go to though, by either drawing or changing district boundaries, to make sure one political party has an advantage when it comes to the outcome of an election. This takes away the whole point of being a democratic country where people have the freedom to choose their own government, and representation. Because elections are rigged and peoples votes don't count, legislators makeup district boundaries that only benefit them, and most importantly keep a party chosen by them and only them in a secure route to WIN, without caring about what the voters actually want. Making partisan gerrymandering a big threat to democracy because instead of having the people choose, politicians are choosing for them. Since legislators draw the district…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alyssa Mattson 2A Current Event #3 Despite mutual agreement between the Republican and Democratic parties, the Senate still could not pass a bill enacting criminal justice reform. It was believed that this overhaul bill would be the “bipartisan success story of the year”, according to New York Times writer Carl Hulse. However, this was not the case. Some Republicans Senators disagreed with the idea of reducing minimum sentences, as well as providing President Obama with a “legacy victory” nearing the end of his presidency.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Baker Vs Tennessee

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages

    According to the Tennessee State Constitution, Tennessee is required to redraw their legislative districts every ten years so that each district would have almost equal population. Charles Baker and other residents complained that since Tennessee had not redistricted for almost sixty years (1901), Shelby County had about ten times the amount of people as the rural district, decreasing the value of their votes. He argued by having this population difference, Tennessee could not uphold the “one person, one vote” requirement. Baker sued the Secretary of State for Tennessee, Joe Carr, for ignoring this Tennessee law. He claimed that this action violated the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment focuses on two clauses, the establishment clause, and the free exercise clause. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment or religion, or prohibit the free exercise thereof.” In other words the First Amendment is a religious expression of peoples own political expression (Patterson 114). Within this amendment there are two clauses that hold many differences and can come into conflict with each other.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. U.S. Const. amend. I. Exemptions may be altered or repealed except those exempting real or personal property used exclusively for religious, educational or charitable purposes as defined by law and owned by any corporation or association organized exclusively for one or more of such purposes and not operating for profit. N.Y. Const.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some proponents of term limits believe that political PACs would lose some of this power if term limits were imposed because it would disrupt the relationships between candidates and PACs by constantly rotating the politicians in power. However, the agencies that are sophisticated and eager to deploy their money in Washington and, as Sandra Day O’Connor wrote in the 2003 Supreme Court Case that upheld most of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, “Money, like water, will always find an outlet” In the short run, term limits can destroy the long standing relationships between Congressmen and special interest groups, and every decade or two, a new set of Congressmen will be eager for donations. But super PACs and interest groups will continue to funnel money into politics. Most proposals for term limits advocate for the chance to run for election at least once, so politicians will continue to welcome financial support for these campaigns; term limits would force interest groups to work harder to gain their influence with each new class of…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcdonald Vs Chicago Essay

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Elections are vital in maintaining a democratic government, ensuring that the will of the collective people shall be represented by their elected officials. However, under certain forms of government, including that of the United States, individual liberties are protected from governmental legislation. This can create a strange predicament in which the will of the people conflicts with the rights of the individual, thus spurring debate as to which will take precedent. This conflict was the central cause of McDonald v. Chicago, in which laws formed by democratically elected officials were contested on the grounds of civil liberty infringement by individuals in the community. While the McDonald v. Chicago case was being reviewed by the Supreme Court in 2010, the laws in question were implemented approximately 30 years prior.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fighting Voter Suppression Voter suppression is a strategy to influence the outcome of an election by discouraging or preventing people from exercising the right to vote. As states keep passing voter suppression laws, our voting rights remain being attacked. Many states, California for example, make their citizens believe that after any contact with the criminal justice system means they have lost their right to vote. The whole reason for making people believe this is so people of color will stop voting since majority of the people in California’s prison are African American, Latino, or Asian American. Every voter deserves a voice.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A part of the First Amendment of the constitution states “[c]ongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” The Establishment Clause intends to prevent any government endorsement or support of religion (Freedom of Religion and the Establishment Clause). Throughout history and different time periods, many contrasting interpretations of this clause have formed. Many court cases have helped develop the meaning the this Clause. The Establishment Clause’s interpretation remains controversial, although numerous tests have helped the Clause itself.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Amendment Pros And Cons

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    There are many people around the world that would voice their own opinions about changes if they thought that their voices would be heard. Those people are always wondering if their ideas would be good for the country or if it would screw everything up. They do not speak up due to the fact that they are afraid to make mistakes that could cause a lot of damage inside the government or they are scared that they would not get heard at all. Some do not realize the process to get their idea ratified into an amendment. The series of steps that must be underwent can also shock and discourage others when submitting their own opinions of to the government.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over two-hundred years ago, the first experiment into a true democratic state began in the United States of America, with the signing of the Constitution. The United States had just won a war against the oppressive British Empire, and a new nation was born out of the independence. The Constitution was written at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia Pennsylvania, which was convened from May 25th, of 1787, until the Constitution was signed on September 17th, 1787. This was the first time that free men came together to establish a set of laws to protect the formation of a new nation. The Constitution includes ten original amendments, which are commonly referred to as The Bill of Rights.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction This paper will define what statutory criminal law is on the state and federal levels of government. This paper will also look at the states authority to enact criminal laws by statute, and what the states limitations are in doing so. This paper will further explore the federal government’s authority to enact statutory criminal laws and what its limitations are. Lastly, this paper will describe what powers political subdivisions have in making statutory criminal laws.…

    • 1077 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a partisan election, a candidate’s party is labeled on the ballot. This gives the voters an outlook on the candidate’s beliefs and ideals. I believe that voting for judges in a partisan election can have its pros and cons. It is not the most effective method because is it mainly based on name recognition. Although, this method can be good because some judges that are appointed are already well experienced.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays