In recent years, journalists have discussed in countless articles with privacy increasingly being invaded by the greater use of drones by the general public and some law enforcements. The predominant new problem with modern technology is dealing with regulating commercial drones in the United States. Drones are an unmanned aircraft or ship that can navigate autonomously- consisting of the ability of functioning without an individual inside the aircraft. The controversy over done regulations is best defined as an argument about if passing additional regulations of commercial drones would be a greater benefit than harm in society. Several interest groups are debating whether, “additional drone regulations be passed”. This debate is becoming more
…show more content…
Finally, some think also legislation of the number of registered drone regulations is needed to get passed as the number of registered drones can regulate itself. The main question that is trying to be answered is, “Should additional regulations of registered commercial drones be passed by legislations?”
One important group in the controversy over commercial drone owners are Americans whom don’t own commercial drones. Because these people believe that regulation of the number of registered commercial drones legislation is needed to be passed, they tend to say the number of commercial aircraft have more than doubled in the past two years. Furthermore, because they care about the safety of the people, they want everyone to feel safe of their surroundings when a drone is flying around the air. An example of a stakeholder is Missy Cummings, who recently argued that he Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have made little progress in recent years to come up together as a whole with a regulation in her article, “matches our long-term security and economic interests,” (par.6) the principal claim is, legislation should be …show more content…
On Missy Cummings side, her stakeholders similarly argue that the best solution to regulated drones is to have the president administration, “lead a comprehensive interagency review of military and commercial trends in drones” (par. 8). Therefore, this would inform the administration of the advancement drone technology has made over several years. Also, she states another solution. Her second solution mentions the president administration of “continue to reform its export control rules” (par. 9). This would allow regulation be less difficult to be follow within military and commercial drones. Lastly, Cummings offer her third solution of the, “FAA can accelerate efforts under the 2012 Modernization and Reform Act to integrate drones into civilian airspace” (par. 10). This would accelerate the technological progress of commercial drones. However, Todd Humphreys offer his solution of regulation, which mentions, “FAA to adopt simple measures that sharply reduce the risk of accidental or unsophisticated drone incursions” (par. 12) which, is meant to not enforce additional regulations while allowing technological advancement of drones. In the end, Michaelle Bond gave a solution, in which “get the community behind us and to get them to trust us” (par. ). Therefore, benefiting the law enforcements for allowing the use of commercial drones in public situations. Lastly, allows law enforcement
Finally, some think also legislation of the number of registered drone regulations is needed to get passed as the number of registered drones can regulate itself. The main question that is trying to be answered is, “Should additional regulations of registered commercial drones be passed by legislations?”
One important group in the controversy over commercial drone owners are Americans whom don’t own commercial drones. Because these people believe that regulation of the number of registered commercial drones legislation is needed to be passed, they tend to say the number of commercial aircraft have more than doubled in the past two years. Furthermore, because they care about the safety of the people, they want everyone to feel safe of their surroundings when a drone is flying around the air. An example of a stakeholder is Missy Cummings, who recently argued that he Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have made little progress in recent years to come up together as a whole with a regulation in her article, “matches our long-term security and economic interests,” (par.6) the principal claim is, legislation should be …show more content…
On Missy Cummings side, her stakeholders similarly argue that the best solution to regulated drones is to have the president administration, “lead a comprehensive interagency review of military and commercial trends in drones” (par. 8). Therefore, this would inform the administration of the advancement drone technology has made over several years. Also, she states another solution. Her second solution mentions the president administration of “continue to reform its export control rules” (par. 9). This would allow regulation be less difficult to be follow within military and commercial drones. Lastly, Cummings offer her third solution of the, “FAA can accelerate efforts under the 2012 Modernization and Reform Act to integrate drones into civilian airspace” (par. 10). This would accelerate the technological progress of commercial drones. However, Todd Humphreys offer his solution of regulation, which mentions, “FAA to adopt simple measures that sharply reduce the risk of accidental or unsophisticated drone incursions” (par. 12) which, is meant to not enforce additional regulations while allowing technological advancement of drones. In the end, Michaelle Bond gave a solution, in which “get the community behind us and to get them to trust us” (par. ). Therefore, benefiting the law enforcements for allowing the use of commercial drones in public situations. Lastly, allows law enforcement