The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

Superior Essays
“We’ve been talking about this for a good while, the immorality of drones, dropping bombs on innocent people. It’s been over 200 children so far. These are war crimes.” (Gavin) Princeton professor Cornel West says during the Smiley & West radio show. Drone strikes have been an area of controversy, but the topic is usually under the radar in the typical American’s life. This tale of immoral or moral goes further than whether droning people is evil or not. Drones kill hundreds of innocent people, but they also manage to kill terrorists. Do drone strikes cause more harm than good? I am here to prove to you that they ultimately do cause more harm than good because it kills many civilians, it harms the mental state of survivors and even operators …show more content…
and the harboring country concur to attempt a drone strike, they have already determined that the target is causing some sort of terrorism and mayhem in the community. An article from The Atlantic written by Michael Lewis, begins to tell us how the drones actually are able to shadow targets for extended periods of time in order to determine when the best time is before they attempt the bombing. “Their ability to follow targets for days or weeks accomplishes two things that contribute to saving the lives of innocents: First, it confirms that the target is engaged in the behavior that put them on the target list, reducing the likelihood of striking someone based on faulty intelligence. Second, by establishing a "pattern of life" for the intended target, it allows operators to predict when the target will be sufficiently isolated to allow a strike that is unlikely to harm civilians.”(Lewis) While saving the life of civilians is in the best interest of the government agencies and the drone operators, there is no avoiding the inevitable death of innocent people. In a study from New York and Stanford Universities, called “Living Under Drones:Death,Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan,” depicts the actual amount of civilian deaths that have occurred since the US have begun their drone program. The article, being from 2012 has 5 years of civilian death unrecorded, which may have increased since the rise of ISIS. “A new joint study from New York and Stanford Universities, "Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan," estimates from an analysis of public records that as many as 881 civilians, including 176 children, have been killed since the US covert drone program began.” (Mulrine) The number of terrorists dead is much greater than this number, but this number is astounding. Nearly 1000 civilians in total dead, including the children, and this is only due to the drone

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Drone Strikes

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under international humanitarian law, the targeted persons must be directly playing a part in hostilities with the United States. Furthermore, the targeted persons must also pose an imminent threat that only lethal force can prevent (“Living Under Drones”). Simply being assumed to have a connection with a "militant" organization or under the United States policy of "signature" drone strikes is not legally appropriate to make someone a acceptable target for killing. Moreover, the United Nations ' Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism, Human Rights Chief, and Special Rapporteur on summary, arbitrary, or extrajudicial executions have all labeled US drone strikes as a violation of sovereignty, and have pressed for investigations into the legality of the…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide safety for Americans against al-Qaeda. Rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the country, the use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals ethical? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem unmoral. Kenneth Anderson, however, provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective with his tone, organization, use of quotes, and appeal to logic in his article, “The Case for Drones.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States should stop using drones because it kills innocent people, it can be hacked and it crashes a lot. Civilians who have nothing to do with the war or terrorism gets killed by drones. Author states that, “The Bureau of Investigative journalism, a U.K. nonprofit, estimates that since 2004, CIA drone…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first targeted drone strike by the United States occurred on Feb. 4, 2002 in Afghanistan when a CIA Predator drone fired on a group they believed included Osama bin Laden. The targets, all killed, were civilians gathering scrap metal. The most common drone used for attack purposes, General Atomics' MQ-9 Reaper, has a range of 3,682 miles, an operational altitude of 50,000 ft, and a maximum flight time of 27 hours. Civilians accounted for 8-17% of all deaths from US drones in Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia. So read on to learn more about drones strikes.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Ethics surrounding drone warfare has been a controversial debate that has not yet captured the full attention of the public in the west. The main arguments for using drone warfare has been about saving lives and cost, but such argument pales in comparison to the arguments against it. To examine the counter arguments of why drone warfare is ethically wrong, we must look at the political stance of the governments using drone warfare, the society’s responsibility, the ethics of the way that the drone strikes are conducted, the effectiveness of drone warfare and the international irresponsibility and unethical nature of drone strikes. Drone warfare saves the lives of soldiers by placing them out of harms way; this is one of the arguments for…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crawford ,Shaun Wiley and Nina Ventresco in page 25 “Examining Americans Attitudes Towards Drone Strikes on Eve of the 2012 Presidential Election”. “Analysis of social Issues & Public policy 14.1(2014:46-60 Academic search Premier. Web 10 May 2016.The Central Intelligence Agency began targeting alleged members of al-Qaeda with remote control-operated drones. Also that what happened in Chicago represents growing lawlessness that threatens every American community.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in Pakistan, the use of drone strikes were targeted to less than 10 percent of the identified targets of the al-Qaeda, and less than 2 percent of all “militants” killed were identified leaders or the al-Qaeda or other terrorist organization. Analyzing this information shows that a majority of drone strikes are not aimed at terrorist individuals but rather an individual who fit the profile of the terrorist or terrorist organization. The continuation of attacks in Pakistan also does not justify their cause. After 9/11 the war was authorized because the government realized how big the threat of the al-Qaeda was.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You live in Syria, your hometown is taken over by terrorists. As if the terroristic violence is enough, you constantly hear the roar of drones invading the skies. At work with your co-workers and at home with your families, every second of the day you ponder upon the question, “Am I next?”. Target drone strikes create even more unnecessary fear in neighborhoods taken over by terrorists. We should stop trying to end terrorism with lethal force such as drone strikes.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone Warfare Ethics

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There have been many American people questioning the United States Drone Program over the last six years; Is this new type of warfare moral? How many civilian casualties have occurred since the program began at the beginning of Obama’s presidency? How…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones Research Papers

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The history of drones dates back the World War I and has come a long way in the use as surveillance as a military and civilian usage and can take us to the future with food and package delivery service. Some of which all could agree is good and others suggest as terrifying. If a drone is used to drop water to a stranded hiker, fight a fire or give a lifetime memory to a couple at their wedding then we smile and give support to drones. While on the other side we cringe at the thought of bombing a house or airfield that supports the war on termism. Drones are a unique machine that as any tool can be used for good and evil and is in the hands of those pressing the controls.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    involvement in the Middle East is the use of drone strikes. Drones are large unmanned aerial vehicles that can hover to take pictures of targets or launch missiles to decimate terrorists. Drone strikes are now becoming popular because of the extremely low cost and efficiency. Because of these newly implemented use of drones in the Middle East, the risk to U.S. soldiers has decreased dramatically. Drone strikes offer a new form of warfare in which fewer American lives are at risk, and low collateral damage.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aggressive Drone Warfare

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As of April 7, 2016 there were several drone strikes in Khost, Afghanistan that killed 17 civilians when people tried to get the bodies from the first strike, another missile was fired killing more civilians, and after that more civilians were killed by a third and final strike (Mangal and Mashal 2016). This is a perfect example how the use of drone warfare is too aggressive in Afghanistan. The first missile never struck the appropriate target and yet more missiles were fired without any confirmation on if the appropriate target had been struck or not (Mangal and Mashal 2016). The United States cannot continue to fire missiles from drones carelessly without absolute confirmation of who they are firing on. If this aggressive drone policy continues in…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of drones abroad has killed thousands of terrorist and stopped the plots of future terrorist activities. When it comes to safety drones are a very safe military weapon; drones have the least amount of civilian…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using drones is the best way, in my opinion, to kill bad people. Drones are unmanned airplanes used to kill enemies. My first reason is the attacks are much cheaper than sending out manned aircraft, and my second reason is drone strikes are secretive. The United States should continue to use drones to kill bad people. First off, using drones is cheaper than sending out manned aircraft.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The reason for drone strikes are favored among militaries around the world is because they work. They are more effective in suppressing a target than infantry or other…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays