Disagreements Over Free Tuition The recent talks surrounding tuition being free and its impact to the society of people in the United States has been a hot topic recently. Many agreements and as well disagreements have risen over if the tuition for a college student should be free. “Tennessee Is Showing How Free Tuition Community College Works” by Celeste Carruthers, “Free Tuition Is a Needless Windfall for Affluent Voters and State Institutions” by Michael J. Petrilli, and “The Problem Is That Free College Isn’t Free” by Andrew P. Kelly argue at the definition if having a free tuition could work. Meanwhile, “Obama’s “Free” Community College Scheme” by Michael A. LaFerrara, and “Free Tuition Can Boost Latinos College Access and Completion Rates” by Deborah Santiago argue if having free college tuition is good. As a result, rhetors who want to intervene in this debate should at the level of definition. Carruthers, Petrilli, Kelly, LaFerrara, and Santiago all agree of the existence of a free tuition plan. Carruthers, Petrilli, and Kelly reach the level of defining free tuition as being able to work or not, while LaFerrara and Santiago reach the level of having a free tuition is either good or bad.
The authors of the debate all have similar and well as different ways they would define if free tuition is able to work. Petrilli, Kelly, and LaFerrara argue that …show more content…
Carruthers says that it is “effective at getting more students into college” (Carruthers). She also argues that it would allow a clearer reflection of the education system with opportunities and challenges faced by the students (Carruthers). On the level of definition, the author Santiago agrees with Carruthers that it can get more people into college. Santiago also defines it as an easier way to even the playing field among the Latinos and
The authors of the debate all have similar and well as different ways they would define if free tuition is able to work. Petrilli, Kelly, and LaFerrara argue that …show more content…
Carruthers says that it is “effective at getting more students into college” (Carruthers). She also argues that it would allow a clearer reflection of the education system with opportunities and challenges faced by the students (Carruthers). On the level of definition, the author Santiago agrees with Carruthers that it can get more people into college. Santiago also defines it as an easier way to even the playing field among the Latinos and