Criminal Justice Case Study

Superior Essays
Intro
Due to his own careless driving, Sam has driven into the back of a vehicle which was inhabited by a driver at the time. Sam is requiring information regarding the structures of both civil and criminal courts. Sam’s actions have ultimately resulted in the injuries of the other driver and damage to the vehicle. Police were called to the scene where an arrest of Sam was made and a charge of dangerous driving was positioned. The injured driver has the intent to sue Sam in negligence for the damages to the vehicle and the personal injuries gained from the incident.
Criminal
The Criminal courts deal with criminal matters. Summary, indictable and either-way offences all go through the criminal courts. If Sam’s case was to go through
…show more content…
Potential grounds for appeal can be on the basis of ‘misdirection of law or facts, failure to refer to a defence, inappropriate comments by the judge, or jury irregularity.’ as stated in the AQA Law book. The Court of appeal consists of three senior judges, the superior of the three is referred to as the lady/lord chief justice. They have the power to quash convictions, in addition to the Criminal Appeal Act (1968) that makes it permissible for judges to call a retrial on similar charges. If an appeal does occur, the case will progress onto the supreme court where there is more often than not a collection of seven judges to allow a balanced bench. If necessary, the Supreme Court can send the case lower down the court system if they consider the case to be somewhat beneath …show more content…
It is considered to be the final court of appeal for matters on English Law. The Constitutional Reform Act (2005) spurred the creation of the Supreme Court as a replacement for the House of Lords. This change occurred during October of 2009. There is no link between Parliament and the Supreme Court. The judges involved with this court are known as the Justices of the Supreme Court. The majority of cases that reach the Supreme Court are in relation to general public importance. Leave to appeal must be gained from either the Supreme Court or the original court. Appeals are mainly received from the Court of Appeal, civil division. However, the Administration of Justice Act (1969) allowed a procedure known as ‘Leap-frog’. This means that if a High Court Judge states a case to be adequate for the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court grants leave to appeal it is permissible for a case to leap-frog directly from the High Court to the Supreme

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The High Courts in Calcutta, Madras and Bombay were the most important. Appeals could lie from these three courts to the Judicial Committee of Privy Council in England. The first important inference to a Supreme Court was made in the Nehru Report. It recommended that this hierarchy of the courts shall be kept, but there should be an apex court, i.e., Supreme Court, with original jurisdiction in all federal matters where interpretation of constitution was concerned. Various committees studied the question of Federal court and Supreme Court.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It can do this with any of the three exceptions as set out in Young v. Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944] KB 718. Those decisions being that its previous precedent was made with a lack of care. (Per incuriam) secondly the court has set two conflicting precedents, and finally the Court of Appeals decision is incompatible with a later Supreme Court ruling.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge decides on how much damages should be awarded. The defendant need to pay for it unconditionally unless the defendant can prove that it is a contributory negligence and reduce the damages in which had happened in Froom v Butcher in 1976. In criminal law, if the defendant is convicted, he or she will be sentenced. The sentences were set by Parliament and judge granted punishment upon the seriousness of offences and other factors such as the defendant’s previous record. The punishment types are fines, prison, community sentences and…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judicial branch encompasses the judges and justices of the state and federal courts. First, we will examine the nomination and appointment process and how it differs from Supreme Court Justices. Then, we’ll analyze how the selection judges and justices and length of terms differ between Supreme Court Justices and members of Congress. Lastly, we’ll take a look at ways that Judges and Justice may be removed from office. Overall, the constitution lays out the framework for a complicated justice system, which differs greatly from the other branches of government.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every step of the process describes different approaches to proving innocence or guilt of the defendant. Law enforcement and the court system to help protect members of society by convicting, punishing, and rehabilitating people who have done illegal matters. With the help of each step, the criminal justice…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They hear cases regarding federal laws, federal constitutional issues, and crimes punishable under both federal and state law and many more. The justices decide what cases they want to hear and they usually are cases addressing constitutional issues or federal law. For cases to get to the US Supreme Court parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court have to petition the Supreme Court to hear their case. By doing that, you have ask to grant a writ of certiorari. The jurisdiction is up to the US Supreme Court; they decide and have the authority to hear a case.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judicial System

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court does have some limits on its power. Original jurisdiction is when the Supreme Court reviews it first. The number of this type is a smaller compared to the appeals from the various lower courts. The routes to get there from appeals courts would be through rights of appeal, in forma pauperis petition, certification, and writ of certiorari. The rights of appeals is when a lower court bring a hearing up to a higher court for a rehearing of the case and this is mostly used by the court of appeals.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Law Making System

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Article III creates the Supreme Court, which is the highest court of the country so that the federal courts are created below the Supreme Court. The courts deal with United States laws instead of the state laws, and federal judges are appointed instead of elected. Congress has set nine members that are justices for the Supreme Court, and as they are appointed, justices usually serve for it for life. The other important duty that significant is the judicial branch has to judge whether laws and executive actions are constitutional or not. According to carry out this scheme, the Supreme Court regulates the judicial review, which is the power of the Supreme Court to decide if laws made by the legislative and executive branches are unconstitutional.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notwithstanding, the Courts are very much reserved in terms of dealing with Congress. More particularly, the landmark case Marbury v. Madison (U.S. Supreme Court, 1803), essentially formed the basis for judicial review under Article III of the Constitution. In Marbury, William Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court to require the newly appointed Secretary of State, James Madison, to deliver his commission as a justice of the peace position in the District of Colombia. The constitutional issue before the Court was whether Congress could expand the original juridiction of the Supreme Court. Ultimately, in an unaminous (4-0) decision, the Court decided that although Marbury had a right to his commission, the Court did not have the authority to compel Madison to deliver the same.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two drivers as well as the owner of the desk broke a series of laws. In order to prove a criminal offense there must be Mens Rea, mental intent required to carry out crime, as well as Actus Reus, the physical act itself. Driver 1 is guilty of Unlawful Appropriation and Larceny from the person. Driver 2 is guilty of Assault with intent to commit specified felonies, Unlawful Appropriation, and Larceny from the person. The owner is guilty of Forgery and Counterfeiting.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays