The Pros And Cons Of Corporations Treated As People

Decent Essays
The world would be unfair if corporations were treated as people. Corporations already have the 14th amendment which already gives them the rights to be a person. The rights that they already have are ok, but they shouldn’t be granted anymore rights. If corporations were treated as people, they would take advantage of many of the rights that people have. Corporations shouldn’t be treated as people because people may start claiming the rights that corporations have, corporations wouldn’t get punished fairly for crimes, and they would be able to give limitless amounts of money to political campaigns and candidates. People would try to claim the same rights that corporations have. Since corporations don’t pay taxes, people wouldn’t want to …show more content…
The only punishment a corporation would get is a fine. This is a quote about what corporations could get away with from The Washington Post writer named Catherine Rampell from the article Corporations are people. So what if people were corporations?, “Even if you killed someone, stole a house, funded a genocidal regime, or terrorize the global economy, you wouldn’t go to jail.” A corporation could be shut down for crimes, but the people in the corporation could still commit a crime, and they wouldn’t be punished. If corporations had our rights, the world wouldn’t be as safe, and people would get away with crimes more often. Corporations shouldn’t have our rights if it means causing the world more problems. Corporations would be able to contribute infinite amounts of money to political campaigns and candidates. Corporations can’t give money directly to campaigns and candidates, but they can do things such as advertising for them that costs money. If a candidate has their own corporation, they could use money in the corporation to help themselves get advertised, and become well known. Political campaigns and candidates will have fair chances for running if corporations just don’t have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since these large corporations weren’t natural according to ideological terms was an outlaw to society and according to the accepted theory the projected the ideal economy was to be made up of equal competition and equal opportunity that were unrestricted by men. By doing equal competition and opportunity was to serve in the best interest for the people to get a distribution of equal wealth in society…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Main Concept The Progressive Era saw several acts of legislation that would change the way American society operated. Sherman-Anti Trust Act In 1890 big business controlled much of the American economy. The Sherman Act allowed the United States government for the first time to investigate a business.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Although there is a massive amount of wealth in the ever-expanding corporate wallet, the possible distorting effects of their potential influence is not enough to revoke the freedom of speech just because they have money to back their opinions with. The threat of quid pro quo, or expecting something when giving something, is just not enough to prevent corporations from expressing their view and exercising their First Amendment right to free…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Corporations are comprised of people, but that group is not a person itself. The Bill of Rights "[sets] the rights of individual men and women," not for groups of men or groups of women…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Corporations An association of individuals, created by law or under authority of law,having a continuous existence independent of the existences of its members, and powers and liabilities distinct from those of its members.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the politician voting in favor of the company, their decision can have negative effect on the public and therefore the country. millions of dollars are poured into politics from companies and high end investors, usually the 1% of people that actually can afford it. Not to mention that most of dark money is used towards negative ads towards the other running candidate, rather than showing the positives of the one who sending out the negative…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bernie Sanders Influence

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyone has heard of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Whether you see her on a debate or on Fox News, you probably have heard a lot about her. On the other hand, not everyday do we hear about her fellow Democrat running, Bernie Sanders. What distinguishes Sanders from all other candidates is that he refuses to accept large campaign contributions from large corporations. This allows him to remain uninfluenced by corporate interests.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction When Corporations Rule the World expounds on how economic globalization has focused the influence to manage global organizations and economic markets and disconnect them from responsibility to the social interest of individuals. The novel notates the overwhelming human and conservational values of the struggles of these establishments to renovate morals and foundations universally to assist their own businesses. It also exposes how and why millions of individuals are acting to retrieve their civil and financial authority from this discriminatory potency and offers a plan for reestablishing fairness and delving economic influence in the general public and communities. The book outlines the damage that corporations have caused universally to our economic system, and the complexities of the structuring issues in corporate organizations.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The majority of American citizens are seeing their share of the pie shrink more and more, while a tiny portion of the populace is gaining funds and influence in leaps and bounds. Is it fair that less than 1% of the total population controls so much of the wealth and are given special considerations when it comes to tax laws? This can be debated back and forth until our faces turn blue. The real question is why are they given these favorable circumstances? Why should they be seen as better than the rest of us?…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth Inequality Essay

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1976 , the wealthiest one percent of Americans owned 19% of all the private material wealth in the US Today, they own over 40% of all wealth. Their share now exceeds the wealth owned by the bottom 92% of the US population combined. (Edward N. Wolff, Top Heavy: A Study of Increasing Inequality in America Twentieth Century Fund: 1995). From 1976 till the present , the power of the wealthy has increased greatly meaning their power has increased as well. When a certain group constantly gains power they will abuse it and this can be seen with the unfair wealth distribution in this country.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We have been brought up with the misconception that the primary purpose of corporations is to increase profit for their shareholders even in cases of eleemosynary organizations. Milton Friedman in his 1970 article The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profit, illustrates that the central responsibility of a business is “to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits” (pg 6). His reason being those corporate executives and managers are agents who are morally and legally obligated to act in the best interest of their principle. Friedman’s’ neoliberal economics, is being contested by stakeholders theory which takes socially responsible into consideration. Dana Brakman Reiser in the article The Next big Idea: Flexible Purpose Corporations introduces the idea that social enterprises have multiple objectives, which are to earn profits for owners and promote social good.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social responsibility is a heavily disputed topic in the world of business and economics. John Mackey, co-founder of Whole Foods Market, claims that a business has multiple social responsibilities to each of its shareholders. He includes customers, employers, investors, and the community as part of the business’ stakeholders and claims that in fulfilling the needs of each group, the company must be mindful of the values of the other groups. On the other hand, Milton Friedman claims that there is no social responsibility of business, and that social responsibility falls on the government instead. Lastly, there is T.J. Rodgers who leans towards the arguments made by Friedman and objects against Mackey’s philosophy of altruism ahead of individual…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits, Milton Friedman argues that the only duty of a company towards society, referred to as a social responsibility, is to work towards the best interest of its owners; usually to maximize profits within the confines of the law . As a company is not an intelligent being, Friedman uses corporate executives as the primary subject of most of his arguments. As an employee of a firm’s owners, an executive is under legal obligation to serve them as a custodian of their private property and serve this role within the rules of the free market, engaging in legal, open and free competition. If they feel that they have some other higher responsibility as an individual than they…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Did you know that about 280,000 people die annually due to being overweight? Most people don’t know how eating unhealthy can cause major difficulties in their later years. Eric Schlosser is an investigative journalists, who wrote the nonfiction book called “Fast Food Nation”. The book is about the global and local influences the United States’ fast food industries have. Although some may argue that the corporations should led a reform of the US food system, overall, the government should take responsibility because history supports their ability to improve corporate corruption and they should be more concerned about improving public health.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people will argue whether corporate greed can benefit a business or destroy it. Greed has always been known to be a sin, “an intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power or food”. Although most will agree that being greedy is not an honorable trait to have, opinions change when people realize that they might gain a great deal out of someone else’s success. As our society is continuously evolving without corporate greed it would not be progressing as rapidly as it is and has been in the last number of years. Corporate greed is in fact good, there are multiple successful people that have aided humanity by their greedy decisions and actions.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays