The Pros And Cons Of Biomedical Engineering

Improved Essays
A biomedical engineer’s job is to seek solutions for illnesses and to advance the medical field. To help find these solutions biomedical engineers are inventing a way to create artificial organs to make more accurate drugs without side effects. As a result, much controversy has resulted from biomedical research and how biomedical engineers obtain their specimen. The results of this research have yet to be determined, but many researchers believe the benefits will be worth the risks and will put a halt to the criticism. As a biomedical engineer, ethics is an issue that is constantly faced because of controversial research; therefore, supporters and opposers are seeking a solution to unethical research.
Biomedical engineers must be able to determine
…show more content…
Animal testing has always been opposed by organizations because of the living condition that research animal live in. Fore example, The Humane Society of the United States has stated that “Certain species, such as chimpanzees and other apes, cannot be kept humanely in laboratory caging and should not be used in harmful research given their highly evolved mental, emotional, and social features and their concomitant vulnerability to suffering from living in captivity in research settings.” (“Statement”). But the main controversy in biomedical engineering is stem cell research, mostly because of where they obtain the stem cells. The National Research Council has explained, “Stem cells are unspecialized cells that can self-renew indefinitely and also differentiate into more mature cells with specialized functions. Research on human embryonic stem cells, how ever is controversial, given the diverse views held in our society about the moral and legal status of early embryo.” (National Research 1). Opposers argue that destroying embryonic cells and fetuses to obtain stem cells is something humans should not mess with. The general public believes that biomedical researches are “playing god” by destroying embryonic cells, but scientists have a bigger fear. Scientists fear that stem cell research will eventually lead to the creation of human clones. The reasoning behind this fear …show more content…
People have been pushing for bans like the great ape research ban, which pushes to ban the use of non-human great apes in research. Others seek to ban stem cell research because of how embryonic cells are obtained. In 1995 the Dickey-Wicker Amendment was passed as an attempt to limit funding to stem cell researchers. Megan Kearl explains the Dickey-Wicker amendment is “restricting the use of federal funds for creating, destroying, or knowingly injuring human embryos.” (Kearl). By having this law in place, researchers would have limited funding and it would discourage stem cell research, but this law does not prohibit private companies from continuing stem cell research. Opposers feel this law is not enough to stop research, so they will continue to protest until the biomedical research is stopped

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who are we to take away that right to our uniqueness? We are also taking away our own natural ability to provide a better chance of survival by the genetic differences provided by sexual reproduction. Many arguments have been made in the past on why cloning is ethical, but in retrospect they are wrong. In this case the pro’s do not outweigh the con’s. Arguments have been made stating that cloning could save lives, but it would jeopardize many more than it would save the scientists from the article “The Cloning Debate.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some feel that the cloning of embryos, is morally repugnant and may feel that the idea of cloning humans is “playing God” according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning?” So, if too many people are conflicted based on a moral stance, it will create too much turmoil in the science community. Considering how difficult it is to create clones, scientist cannot afford to get their clones rejected solely based on morale. Others also fear that people could decide to genetically engineer super kids, according to “What are the Pros and…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The main reason that is given against embryonic stem cell research is that it requires the death of human beings, this is not a relevant argument. The argument is based on the hypothesis that embryos are human beings, however, this is the same argument made by those who are against abortions. Albeit, a legislation had been passed in the United States in order to prevent the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, five years later a second bill was passed to allow in vitro fertilized embryos to be used for stem cell research. An argument that was often used in favour of the bill was that these embryos would be “discarded” were they not used for research purposes (Hulburt 80). This is a key idea of embryonic stem cell research, these embryos would not be given birth to anyway, even if they had not been in vitro fertilized, if the parents want to donate the embryo for research purposed, chances are that they would have aborted their embryo even if they had not given it to research labs.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These people believe that our tax money should not go to research that is morally incorrect. These people have strong beliefs and do not want their money going to something they do not support. Also, most believe that any scientific research is a waste of time anyways. The research is a waste if you are willing to destroy the embryos who cannot even choose life. Then there is reason to believe that the government funding this research may be violating the federal law.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So in those defenses the debate over cloning in the U.S. remains intense because it is against human nature. Cloning is an very unnecessary procedure. There are medical reasons why we shouldn’t be able to clone humans. For example, they are cloning people just to use the clones for their organs . We already have donors for the situation of organs.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stem cell research brings a lot of controversy because of the wide range of ways stem cells can be used in research. There are those who support and oppose stem cell research. Stem cell research is currently used to cure cell mutations that could lead to cancers; however, this research could potentially lead to dangerous, unethical experimentation. Using any stem cells to propagate differentiated human cells, tissues, or organs should be prohibited because these embryos are alive, and scientists do not fully know the effects of this research. Scientific background: According to the American Journal of Health Education, “Stem cells are template cells found throughout the body that can grow to become cells with specialized functions” (Eve,…

    • 2551 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the end, people have to think whether it does more good than bad, should be allowed or not, and if allowed should it be controlled or not. Since the technology is very new and scientists do not have full knowledge of this technology it should be controlled. Genetic engineering is capable of helping the whole world in multiple ways but just like anything else it can also be too powerful and get out of control. The government should allow it for the simple fact that it has the power to get rid of diseases, however genetic engineering should be regulated. Not everything scientists have done with it for is useful to humans.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ESCR (embryonic stem cell research) is argued to be a motive that is unfair as well as the debate on whether it should be declared illegal due to the possible death, pain and unfair treatment to all involved ("Ten Problems with Embryonic Stem Cell Research."). It explains the reasons and beliefs of the other party. An additional concern of the opposing part is that fact that, "Humans should not be trying to play God and some argue that stem cell research in the far future can lead to knowledge on how to clone humans. It is hard to say whether this is true, but we have seen devastating consequences of other research-programs, even with good intentions, such as nuclear research (Stem Cell Research-Pros and Cons). The quote explains the human fear behind the matter of stem cell research.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many countries have passed laws stating that experimenting with human embryos in humans cannot be done. Altering human embryos is against many countries policies. This is because it such risky experimenting. Developing a human embryo from altering genetics can cause many problems, and a country does not want to be responsible for that. “A dozen countries, not including the United States, have banned germ-line engineering, and scientific societies have unanimously concluded it would be risky to do.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays