The Pros And Cons Of Biomedical Engineering

Improved Essays
A biomedical engineer’s job is to seek solutions for illnesses and to advance the medical field. To help find these solutions biomedical engineers are inventing a way to create artificial organs to make more accurate drugs without side effects. As a result, much controversy has resulted from biomedical research and how biomedical engineers obtain their specimen. The results of this research have yet to be determined, but many researchers believe the benefits will be worth the risks and will put a halt to the criticism. As a biomedical engineer, ethics is an issue that is constantly faced because of controversial research; therefore, supporters and opposers are seeking a solution to unethical research.
Biomedical engineers must be able to determine
…show more content…
Animal testing has always been opposed by organizations because of the living condition that research animal live in. Fore example, The Humane Society of the United States has stated that “Certain species, such as chimpanzees and other apes, cannot be kept humanely in laboratory caging and should not be used in harmful research given their highly evolved mental, emotional, and social features and their concomitant vulnerability to suffering from living in captivity in research settings.” (“Statement”). But the main controversy in biomedical engineering is stem cell research, mostly because of where they obtain the stem cells. The National Research Council has explained, “Stem cells are unspecialized cells that can self-renew indefinitely and also differentiate into more mature cells with specialized functions. Research on human embryonic stem cells, how ever is controversial, given the diverse views held in our society about the moral and legal status of early embryo.” (National Research 1). Opposers argue that destroying embryonic cells and fetuses to obtain stem cells is something humans should not mess with. The general public believes that biomedical researches are “playing god” by destroying embryonic cells, but scientists have a bigger fear. Scientists fear that stem cell research will eventually lead to the creation of human clones. The reasoning behind this fear …show more content…
People have been pushing for bans like the great ape research ban, which pushes to ban the use of non-human great apes in research. Others seek to ban stem cell research because of how embryonic cells are obtained. In 1995 the Dickey-Wicker Amendment was passed as an attempt to limit funding to stem cell researchers. Megan Kearl explains the Dickey-Wicker amendment is “restricting the use of federal funds for creating, destroying, or knowingly injuring human embryos.” (Kearl). By having this law in place, researchers would have limited funding and it would discourage stem cell research, but this law does not prohibit private companies from continuing stem cell research. Opposers feel this law is not enough to stop research, so they will continue to protest until the biomedical research is stopped

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Christopher Smith's article "Perils and Promise: Destroy an Embryo, Waste a Life", expresses how embryonic stem cell research is not beneficial in any way. If you kill an embryo to save someone else, there is no impact. In fact, the result is neutralized. Although here may be groups of human beings who support embryonic stem cell research, the idea itself surpasses the rules and regulations established in a functional society. The morals and ethics obtained by many people may be rearranged by which human beings may eventually dissocialize.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The process of most stem cell research is executed is with the use of an embryo. According to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association (ALS), “embryonic stem cells can be isolated from fertilized embryos less than a week old.” This process has caused some controversy throughout world and many have chosen not to support stem cell research because of this fact. Many people are disturbed by this because the researchers create a human life from an egg and sperm cell to create an embryo and then use the embryo for the stem cells only, then rid of the embryo all together. One would believe that this is murder because of the destruction and death of an early but yet still live embryo.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These people believe that our tax money should not go to research that is morally incorrect. These people have strong beliefs and do not want their money going to something they do not support. Also, most believe that any scientific research is a waste of time anyways. The research is a waste if you are willing to destroy the embryos who cannot even choose life. Then there is reason to believe that the government funding this research may be violating the federal law.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Is Stem-Cell Research Good

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Since stem-cell research is loosely related to the abortion issue it’s not uncommon for someone to take the same side on both issues. This debate, just like abortion, relates back to the question that no one can find an answer to, when does human life begin? Some say it’s wrong to tamper with a life that can’t…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The use of human embryonic stem cells has been hailed as the next major step in the battle against serious degenerative disorders such as diabetes and heart disease, and for some, debilitating for lethal neurological diseases, such as Parkinson’s. (Braude, Minger & Warwick). However this is a hotly debated issue. Ethical Dilemma The main controversy surrounding stem cell research isn’t about “if” it should be done or not, but rather what source of stem cells are okay to use and what methods are okay for obtaining them.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since stem cells were derived in 1998, scientists have hotly debated the ethicality of human embryonic stem cell research. While some people believe that the disassembly of embryos in order to obtain embryonic stem cells is in violation of the right to life of the embryos, the research of these embryonic stem cells has the potential to result in treatments which may save the lives of millions in years to come. Research concerning human embryonic stem cells is thought to hold cures/treatments to Multiple Sclerosis, Diabetes, Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s Disease, cancer and birth defects. Through the use of stem cells, organ transplants will be at a much lower risk of rejection, as the organs will be grown from the patient 's own DNA ("Benefits…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The diseases are increasing, and so are the cures. The most deadliest diseases from the past no longer remain as dangerous. Yet new diseases emerge. And scientists are trying to find a cures to these new diseases, by sacrificing new lives. “Is it important to kill new lives to save other lives?” is the question embryonic stem cell research poses.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the course of many centuries, scientific study and research has seen significant advancements, especially when it comes to the study of the human body. One of the major developments is embryonic stem cell research which involves the use of cells from early stage embryos. These cells are important because they have yet to mature and therefore are able to evolve into any type of cell found in the human body. Through the use of embryonic stem cell research, scientists may be enabled to learn more about the way that humans develop and possibly develop new ways to treat diseases. Be that as it may, there are many controversies when it comes to human embryonic stem cell research due to the fact that it includes breaking down human embryos which could possibly develop into human beings.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each year, 12.7 million people are diagnosed with cancer, another 7.6 million will die of cancer. Now imagine a cell that has the potential to change the world of medical treatment completely-- a single cell that has the ability of saving and restoring countless lives. Embryonic stem cell (ESC) research is a highly debated topic, which numerous people view as unethical due to the way some critics believe these cells are obtained; others view ESC research as the next step in medical advancement (Neal 1). What are embryonic stem cells? As their name suggests, ESCs come from a fertilized embryo.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical problem that people are confronted with when discussing stem cell research is that in order for this research to happen, a child’s life must cease to exist. The federal government is currently in favor…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the lack of funds by the government, medical research was limited and was not able to progress forward in test trials or determining the researches capability. Congress went as far as even creating The Dickey-Wicker Amendment of 1996, which furthermore, “prohibited the creation of a human embryo to be destroyed, discarded or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death,” (Timeline). Yet in August of 2000, the National Institutes of Health compiled its final guidelines for funding human embryonic stem cell research, explicating writing to, “promise new treatment and possible cure for debilitating diseases and injuries,” (NIH News). The establishment of these rules have caused for embryonic stem cell research to remain an issue under the federal level. Such as how California and New Jersey allocates funding for the project in 2005 but how reports distinguish that only a certain amount of trials under federal funding were ethical under Bush’s administration.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, it is in the best interest of society, scientists and the medical community to further be allowed to conduct such experiments. Stem cell research is helping civilians with illnesses and injuries that would otherwise be labeled as a medical anomaly. The research has to continue to be allowed…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem cell research is a controversial and sensitive topic that has been debated for over two decades. Millions of people every year die from diseases and accidents, such as cancer or Alzheimer’s. Even though there have been medical advancements in the treatment of cancer, most of them cannot cure cancer completely. However, stem cells has the potential to completely cure many diseases and creating new immunizations. Dr. E Donnall Thomas began stem cell research in 1956 when he performed the first bone marrow transplant.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though I am entirely for stem cell research I see the other side of the controversy: scientists are using embryos which is where all humans once came from for a science experiment. Scientists aren't stealing fetuses at all, instead they are using the stem cells from aborted…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stem Cell Research: Right to Life It’s characteristic for most people to automatically jump to the conclusion that all stem cells come from an aborted fetus. Well, this is not true, and this is where the controversy begins. Stem cell research is the study of cells within the body that can develop into another and completely different cell during life, for example a stem cell that was used to create your skin as a skin graft, could now be constructing cells in your blood or bone marrow. When it comes to an aborted fetus, there are not only cells within the fetus, but also within the placenta and the blood, that is contained within.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays