The Pros And Cons Of Banning Night Hunting

Improved Essays
Most people no matter where they come from agree that night hunting is a big safety problem with bullets flying around and not being able to see what’s beyond what you are shooting at, but it’s also about the animals and giving them a fair chance. People who are hunting are also getting a thrill out of it and it takes that thrill away if the animal doesn’t have much of a chance. In 1998 when they decided ban night hunting the province had lots of conversations with the Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations and Métis Nation-Saskatchewan. They decided to ban any unsafe night hunting in the province but still respecting all the treaty and Aboriginal rights.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Is Killing the Solution Over the past Century there have been various opinions on how to prevent, or maintain overpopulation of White-Tailed Deer (WTD). Although killing is the oldest, and most effective method of deer population control, according to the North Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC). Some animal rights groups like People for the ethical treatment of animals (PETA) feel that the killing of the WTD is not the answer to the problem.…

    • 1968 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Tsartlip Indian Band dispute & Provincial Wildlife Legislation. Summary Aboriginal rights and particularly those assigned by treaties have many times collided with other bodies of law. Aboriginal persons also have much experience of legal and judicial matters decided with inadequate knowledge of their legal particularities or in other ways that act against Aboriginal interests and entitlements. The dispute to which this paper refers offers an anomaly in a case decided in 2006 by the Supreme Court of Canada that served the Tsartlip appellants as individuals, not necessarily their band, and contravened by its conclusion in a majority vote in the Supreme Court a federal Canadian law. Section 27 of the Wildlife…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trophy hunting grizzly bears, even through the government claims it is controlled and does not threaten the species, actually might. The grizzly bears have been exterminated from large areas in the province (Gailus, Moola, & Connolly, 2010, pg.6). This is not a result of trophy hunts, but from habitat degradation which the government has not accounted for over the years. This has lead to 9% of the province to be classed as “threatened” and could lead to the bears to be endangered in fewer than 50 years (Gailus, Moola, & Connolly, 2010, pg.6-7). Grizzly bears are protected in many areas because they are either threatened there or it is a protected area, but the bears still die there because of “authorized hunters” (approx.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wolf hunting and trapping season should be outlawed because other animals are being injured in the process. These days’ trappers have been catching a lot more than wolves. Some among the list include mountain lions, eagles, fishers, deer and even family pets. In January, a National Park Service employee accidentally stepped into one, just outside Glacier National Park. The next month, a dog got three of its legs caught in two different traps at once.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Did the framers of the Constitution intend for every U.S. citizen to have the right to bear arms? It is scary to think about what would happen if everyone in a mall had a gun. Under the Second Amendment, American citizens have the right to bear arms and that right should never be violated. Although that is true, gun control is needed because thousands of US citizens are killed every year from the misuse of weapons.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Perhaps one of the most debated topics in the United States is the issue of gun control. Heated debates arguing both for and against stricter gun control policies have raged for decades and have been hot button issues for many politicians during campaign speeches. Supporters of strict gun control laws believe this is the best way to protect citizens; however this logic fails to recognize a crucial point. Enacting and enforcing strict gun laws restricts access to guns only for law abiding citizens who will follow the legal process of obtaining a gun. Gun laws do very little to reduce the amount of illegal firearms nor will it reduce the amount of crime that takes place with a firearm.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the rights of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” However, many believe that it has been, in fact, infringed upon. Gun Control laws have been passed along with many other measures to make it hard for someone to buy and own a gun. But is it necessarily a bad thing? The Government has compromised on the Second Amendment, but it is for the sake of security of the people and the nation.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the era of automatic weapons, large caliber hand guns, and Teflon tipped bullets where extensive background checks, mental evaluations, and waiting periods should be mandatory as they are in most westernized countries, nothing is so dangerous with regards to firearms as the “Gun Show Loophole”, also known as The Brady bill loophole (Hereafter known as the GSL). Because of the GSL, anyone can walk into a gun show and without the burden of showing identification, taking a background check, or having a psychiatric evaluation, they can walk out with a firearm regardless of their criminal or mental history. This is an obvious danger when firearms fall into the wrong hands. “These shows have gotten as common as garage sales, and all this is a problem for us,” Jack Killorin, a spokesman for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms said. “It’s known that guns have moved out of these shows and into criminal hands.”…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is always something on the news about violence, whether it is school shootings or work place violence, so are gun control laws the answer? No, gun control laws do not reduce crimes committed with firearms, and in fact are counterproductive by increasing the violent crime rates, as well as unconstitutional. Gun control laws do not reduce crimes committed with fire arms. A perfect example of this is this is in Massachusetts in 1998, some of the toughest gun laws in the country were passed. Since 1998, gun crime in Massachusetts has gotten worse, not better.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Over the past years, there have been many debates over guns and the protection the Second Amendment gives to firearms. As with all debates, there are sides to them. Gun control activist are people who wish to have legislation passed that is intended to lower violence related to firearms as well as limit a civilians opportunity to possess a firearm. On the other side of the spectrum are the gun rights activist who seek argue that by passing legislation on gun control, it is infringing on the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Signed in on December 15, 1791, the Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms as one of ten amendments that would make up the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control can be Dangerous Gun control has been a very controversial issue in the United States for centuries. It gets worse after every mass shooting because it causes both political sides to debate on whether or not to implement stricter gun policies that will make it much more difficult for people to obtain a weapon. The founding fathers wrote the second amendment because they were afraid of a government that would become too big an oppressive. They believed that people should have the right to protect their families if there is ever an attack like an intruder attempting to harm your family. There are many countries that have tried to implement stricter gun control policies, policies that have persuaded United States officials to…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays