The Pros And Cons Of Banning Assault Weapons

Decent Essays
I don’t see the point of just banning assault weapons, why not all fire arms? Hence, most of the crimes committed over the past years were semi-automatic. They are considered non-assault weapons because it only can shoot one round per pull, but they can cause a massacre. On the other hand, assault weapons are considered full- automatic because it only takes one pull to fire all the rounds, which can kill hundreds of people in matters of seconds. In contrast, If we compare an M4 and AR-15 rifle, they look the same but they have different functionalities. In fact, an M4 is an assault weapon and AR-15 is not. So, what’s the point of banning assault weapons, when we have non-assault weapons? Overall, I have to disagree with this proposal because

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gun laws are one of the things that won’t get everyone satisfied. Everyone has a different opinion due to either political views or past experience. Some may prefer the idea of gun control or banning guns is the only to stop deaths. According to the National Survey of Law Enforcement, “many proposed gun control measures – including bans on assault weapon – will be ineffective at reducing violent crime and that legal gun ownership by private citizens would prove a better safeguard.” Although having a strict gun control may have it’s benefits when reducing death, we must use gun control moderately to decrease the amount of illegal activity surrounding guns.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The actions of gun activists who wish to not have the AR-15 banned are constitutional, because the constitution says we have a right to bear arms in the name of protecting ourselves. The AR-15 is a highly controversial gun which has led to several deaths as a result of misuse of the weapon. It is an extremely sad reality that there are so many lives lost, when it comes to what is supposed to be something used for protection. The AR-15 has been used in several shootings, examples being the Aurora theatre shooting, the Clackamas Mall shooting, and the shooting of 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary. People who are against this gun’s use point to the shootings and say that it is not a good idea to have a military grade weapon on the streets.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states clearly that the people’s right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed on. This has led to one of the most complicated and volatile issues in America today. People on both sides of this issue have strong beliefs. Some argue that when our founding fathers wrote the bill of rights, the guns were not as deadly as the ones available today. Supporters of the Second Amendment today argue that people’s right should not be infringed on no matter what.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sublimation of the assault weapons that were given out could cause both crime and tax would increase and new laws will be enforced. Noticing that assault rifles are not even required to use while hunting, the government already gives out shotguns and pistols. It’s not the gun, but the person who pulls the trigger, but some people want to give that irresponsible individual a weapon of mass destruction. The creation of an assault rifle caused the flow of war to change, think of what it could cause the U.S to turn into.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fundamental rights are granted through the Constitution of the United States, and are a part of our liberty and freedom. Also, The Ninth Amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words the right to bear arms should not be taken away from anyone. Opponents of gun control consider the right to bear arms in some sense a fundamental right, and having those rights taken away is unconstitutional. Although the Fourth Amendment protects the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, it doesn’t protect against felons possessing a firearm.…

    • 3270 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Merriam-Webster is vague in stating what exact type of gun an assault weapon is, declaring it is “any of various automatic or semiautomatic firearms.” its description is the most correct, as “assault weapon” consists of a vast majority of firearms used for hunting, competing, war, and self-defense. Any ban on “assault weapons” would in essence ban all armaments used to threaten or inflict bodily harm, including knives, bats, spears, and swords, as well as guns.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the 1994 assault weapons ban there was no such thing as an assault shotgun or assault pistol. The law essentially did the same thing pistols as it did for rifles. Pre ban there were machine pistols, but they were already highly restricted. The ban just changed the name to assault pistols and broadened the definition to include semi-automatics with two or more of the following features that also accept detachable magazines: threaded barrel, barrel shroud, an unloaded weight of 50oz, a semi-automatic version of fully automatic pistol, or a magazine that isn’t inserted through the grip. These features just don’t make any sense.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With the recent rise of mass shootings in our society, the question has once again rose to the top of popular debate. Should the government ban or limit the sale of assault weapons to the American public? This topic is of particular interest to me due the ramifications that the recent mass shootings have had on my local community. As a resident of the Washington D.C Metro area, I personally knew dozens of friends and local community members who worked at the Navy Yard the day of the mass shooting. On September 16.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also, people would use other various types of weapons to kill someone or protect themselves so it would be worthless to ban them. Assault weapons have multiple shots with one pull of a trigger but it is a very useful gun when people believe they are not. Them guns can save your life in a heartbeat and you would not even give recognition to the fact it was an assault weapon. People think because “assault” is in the name its a gun used for crime, when really its used for a lot of things, people need to stop focusing on the bad things people used them guns to do and focus on the good. Barack Obama went to his highest power to ban these guns for no reason, they are dangerous for some people but that is only the people who dont know how to use them, the government…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people want to ban guns because they think the weapons are killing the people. The realization is that the people are killing the people over small things. An assault weapon ban would not reduce gun violence in America because the criminals will get the weapons and use them in the wrong way. If the second amendment is changed, people will not have the right to bear arms and protect themselves from criminals and will not be able to do what they enjoy.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment Gives People the Right to Bear Arms The United States has 270 million guns, the most in the world, consequently, this brings the question of gun control and the Second Amendment. ( Should More Gun Control Be Enacted ). The Second Amendment protects the right to individual gun ownership, banning the ownership of assault weapons would be unconstitutional. Most criminals who obtain guns do so illegally, thus putting a censorship on gun ownership would not prevent them from getting firearms. Gun control does not stop crime, the criminals that commit these crimes have no respect for the law.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Banning assault weapons implies that criminals would be using illegal means to acquire the same weapons. Security agencies lack the capacity to fully secure the country from illegal firearms. In other words, criminals would still access assault weapons despite banning the same. Possession of assault weapons by criminals in an environment characterized by unarmed civilians put the security of civilians at stake. Citizens are only able to protect themselves when they have access to reliable weapons capable of countering attacks by criminals.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assault weapons do not kill people themselves, it’s the people who kill people. Banning assault weapons is not an effective answer to lower the criminal rate. Each and every gun user has the responsibility to use it in a correct…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 prohibited the sale of guns to several types of individuals consisting of minors, people with criminal records, disabled, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged military personnel and others. In 1993 the Act was changed by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act said that background checks for all unlicensed carriers had to be done before they could purchase any firearms from a licensed dealer. However, there has been discussion that there is a “gun show loophole” in the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 which allows all people, including convicted felons, the ability to purchase guns without a background check. While many people have decidedly formed opinions on gun control, the debate is complicated…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lately, it seems that every time you turn on the television, there is an incidence of gun violence in the news. School shootings, domestic violences, and other forms of firearm brutality make up most of the content displayed in the media, calling for a possible increase in gun control in the United States. This controversial subject has become a common topic of debate all over the country: should civilian-use of violent firearms be limited or prohibited, or should the decision to possess these guns be up to the individual person? There are many arguments supporting and opposing the government 's right to restrict the rights that the Constitution imposes. Some argue that taking weapons away from the people is a violation of the Second Amendment, while others argue that guns have changed too much over time for the allowances of the…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays