The sublimation of the assault weapons that were given out could cause both crime and tax would increase and new laws will be enforced. Noticing that assault rifles are not even required to use while hunting, the government already gives out shotguns and pistols. It’s not the gun, but the person who pulls the trigger, but some people want to give that irresponsible individual a weapon of mass destruction. The creation of an assault rifle caused the flow of war to change, think of what it could cause the U.S to turn into. It’s unpredictable of whether the U.S will turn into after the second amendment is extended. But taxes and crime will increase. Kerry a law enforcer spoken to officers and asked what they thought of the idea, quoted from the Kerry and his research, “Most of the law enforcement agencies wanted that assault weapons ban. They don’t want to go into a drug bust and be facing an AK-47.” If the amendment were extended tax would increase as a reply to all the demand of crime to fund research for new weapons that are stronger and faster than the AK-47 and other guns, proven by Valone who quoted that there was no difference between pulling the trigger on a pistol with an assault rifle. (Ammoland.com)
…show more content…
They extend a law and then release another after it saying where and when to use it, but laws have never stopped people from doing as they wished. Proven by Keith Morgan: law official in the ministry of defense, he spoke and quoted, “I can’t possibly imagine what logic people are following that somehow another law, just one more law, will solve these issues.”
They extend a law and then release another after it saying where and when to use it, but laws have never stopped people from doing as they wished. Proven by Keith Morgan: law official in the ministry of defense, he spoke and quoted, “I can’t possibly imagine what logic people are following that somehow another law, just one more law, will solve these issues.”