The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Decent Essays
According to the People Protecting Animals and Their Habitats, 90 percent of medications tested on animals later proved that they are harmful for humans. Animal testing should be stopped because doesn’t work, costing taxpayers hundreds of millions and it may save some animals but still kills more. First, animal testing really doesnt work. Animals have different physiologies than humans. Stated by People Protecting Animals and Their Habitats, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled, of harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well.” Secondly, testing on animals have costed taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars over the years. Billions of dollars have went to curing cancer in mice, but there still have not even replicated

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Satire

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing Don’t you just love animals? Well, we should stop animal testing, no it’s not good for them. You’re probably thinking we should know more about how the expirementaion effect of drugs worked on animals. How would you feel if someone tested drugs on you to see if it worked on another species.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hayleigh Hamrick-Sharp Mrs. Haver English 12 October 27, 2017 Should Animal Testing Continue or End: Most people do not know what goes on behind the scenes of the beauty industry. How do people think they determine whether a product is safe for a human or not? Animal testing is the most used method of testing products. There are many things people don't know about the method and there are many people against it.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Picture this, you’ve just came home from the mall and you’re going to try on that brand new moisturizer, cosmetic or vitamin supplement. Then suddenly, your skin begins to flare up with inflammation, your tongue itches or you begin to have strange pains. Yet, according to the bottle, these are just minor side effects. Imagine what bigger side effects people had to face during human trials to perfect that product. Or worst, what animal had to suffer the consequences in order to ensure the safety of that human product.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over 100 million animals are killed each year by money-hungry corporations just to test animals for products. There should be other ways to test products instead of using animals. In most cases, animal testing is unreliable, cruel, and even dangerous . Different scientists have been trying to find different alternatives instead of using animals for testing. Many ethical, scientific businesses are offering different incentives to companies to help decrease the number of animals being tested on for human benefit.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate surrounding the use of invasive animal research has been ongoing throughout history. Proponents of the practice are quick to point out the multitude of benefits that have emerged from the practice such as the cures and vaccines to major diseases such as polio, and their capacity to continue to do so in the future. Opponents often claim that the moral status of these animals deem it morally impermissible to do any time of research that can harm them, no matter what the benefits for humans may be. This is especially true in the argument against invasive chimpanzee research. Chimps share similar genetics with humans and have been shown to exhibit an array of emotional responses similar to those of humans, but this does not necessarily…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every year millions of animals die from prescription drug testing. These tests have created multiple cases of abusive behavior that haven’t been made aware. Animal testing is a topic that needs to be fought against and not ignored. Animal testing should be changed because it’s abusive and has harmful tendencies. Reducing animal testing may also help population issues.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine being locked in a cage with thousands of drugs pumping through your system, not only leaving long-term damage but having the effect to kill you. This is happening to thousands of animals. Animal testing has said to have been around since the third and fourth centuries when pigs and goats were dissected to study their insides. What once started as pure curiosity has turned into people using animals, for almost everything. You have to agree that this is wrong and has to be stopped.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Animal Testing Morally Acceptable? Meryssa Hampey Philosophy 2306-073 Introduction The issue of whether the testing of animals is morally justifiable is controversial to say the least. Many people believe that animals, because they are simply not at our same level of intelligence, cannot hold any moral standing, while others believe that the simple fact that animals can and do experience pain is as good a reason as any that they have a right to not suffer.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the 1900’s people around the globe started testing their drugs and other such tests on animals. These tests would be done on animals to test if their product would be dangerous to humans and to see the results. The test resulted in millions of rats, mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits dying just to see if a product would be successful. Testing animals is inhumane and endangers the animals being tested on and should be stopped because testing on animals endangers the animals, Animals can’t speak for themselves and so we don’t know what it is that they want. and By testing animals we are endangering their safety and all other animals that are born from the tested parent and could have bad effects from the test.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    For consequentialist the ends can justify the means but for me they may be vindicated under certain circumstances, but otherwise they do not. In the following discussion I shall use the two moral dilemmas, Euthanasia and Animal Testing, to support my claim. Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide (dying), doctor-assisted dying (suicide), and more loosely termed mercy killing, means to take a deliberate action with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable suffering .In this section, I shall examine euthanasia and I will discuss if I believe this topic to be justified. The procedures writers take to defining euthanasia are different methods; this is because there are two sides to this argument,…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is one of most recently debated and published act. Many books, articles, and countless research case studies have described animal experiments as one of the most barbaric, terrifying, and painful procedures. The link "What is Animal Testing?" from a website maintained by the Cruelty-Free International, defines animal testing as a " scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that is expected to cause pain, suffering, distress or lasting harm.” Additionally, the article provides us with exuberating numbers and states that every year millions of animals are being used in harmful chemical, drug, food, cosmetic tests, and in medical training exercises and die in terrible pain.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    considering they were “God’s creation” as some will say (Monamy 10). On the contrary, British Lord Chancellor Francis Bacon thought that animal testing is an excellent way to learn more about our bodies and how it works (Monamy 10). However, this controversy made animal testing rise. An additional amount of scientists started using different types of animals such as monkeys, rats, birds, dogs, cats, and the list goes on and on. With animal testing in use, scientist found out how the digestive, respiratory, nervous, muscular, etc.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    An easy solution to animal testing are the numerous alternatives that are already available: • Organs on a chip: This was created by Harvard’s Wyss Institute. The idea is to contain human cells grown in a high-tech system to imitate the structures and functions of the body systems and organs (“Alternatives to Animal Testing” Cruelty 1). The chips can be used to replace animal testing in areas of disease research and drug testing, it has also been shown to duplicate human anatomy, infections, and drug responses more accurately than animal experiments do (“Alternatives to Animal Testing” Cruelty 1).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some also agree that there is no other form of testing other than on a living organism. Without testing on animals they wouldn’t have found new medications but in reality no matter how many medicines there are, people need to die because of the process of natural selection. No matter what they found in the past that can change because of the better more accurate ways of testing, so they need to end this form on animal cruelty. Companies don’t want to take the risks, what kind of risks are they talking about when testing on animals for human use can lead to inaccurate information. It’s illogical to keep using these innocent ansinal when there are human cells that can be used and give better results.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (About Cosmetics, HSI) Additionally, animal testing projects overwhelmingly high costs which take part in our government spending, for instance, USA spends $16 billion dollars annually for animal testing at taxpayers expense and is subject to massive waste and mismanagement of…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays