Essay On Animal Population Control

Improved Essays
In recent years, hunting has become an up and coming trend among Americans as a way to control the population of animals, but the practice of hunting is morally inhumane and is denying animals their rights to life. Humans need to strive for a more “hands off” policy when dealing with the animal overpopulation (“Animal Population Control”). Hunting should not be used as a means of animal population control. Controlling the animal population should be done in a nonlethal manner, whether by natural causes, birth control, relocation, or sterilization. The expansion of human settlements around the U.S. is one of the leading causes why human-wildlife encounters have increased in the last few years. Because America’s population continues to …show more content…
Hunters often argue that they are “saving” the animal populations, but these attitudes tend to be hypocritical. It is often asked how it can be said that by killing what we have left is saving it. A quote by an animal conservationist says it best with the words, “Hunters kill any animal they would like to hang over the fireplace, including healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong (“Animal Population Control”).” If nature were to be left alone, the exquisite balance of nature’s ecosystems would ensure the survival and regulation of most species, but when humans get involved, everything changes. However, if humans must intervene to keep the animal population under control, then there are several methods that could be practiced that are not only effective and efficient, but also morally sound. While animal overpopulation is undeniably happening, ways to solve the problematic animal populations can be regulated without the use of guns. Some of the ways that the animal population could be monitored is through birth control or sterilization. By systematizing the number of animals that are able to get pregnant or the time when the animals can get pregnant, it will help to keep the population in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Why Trophy hunting can be good for animal conservation efforts This is an interesting argument and most people, (me included) find it hard to accept. I don’t like trophy hunting I cannot see why anyone would enjoy paying a large sum of money to kill an animal that has done nothing to deserve death. Frankly, the argument is counterintuitive. How can killing animals save animals from being killed? Keep an open mind.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you really believe that animals should have the same rights as us humans? If you think about this, passing a Bill of Rights for animals could go against centuries of human culture, increase the cost of food, hinder medical research, and may cause other problems. I believe that animals should not have a Bill of Rights. My first reason is that such a law would go against human culture because we as people run the world. Can animals even work, cook, clean, or even talk, think about it.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, killing animal have both advantages and disadvantages. Advantages of killing animals are used for food, out of suffering, and dangerous animals. These reasons are the important point that we can kill animals for surviving and helping them. In contrast, we should not kill animals for these following reasons: the cruel thing, the animal extinction, and contrast to religion. In my opinion, killing animals is not appropriate.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, it is considered a social norm to eat animals, but extremely wrong to eat another human. Although this is a norm, this belief technically makes people Speciests because they are favoring saving their own species over other species. By killing animals simply to pleasure our taste buds and considering animals to be acceptable to eat, humans prove themselves to be Speciests. Not only do humans eat animals, but they also use them as test subjects. It is considered very unethical to use a human as a test subject in an experiment even for biomedical research, so animals are used.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been long believed that humans have had a negative impact on wildlife. Conservation is meant to protect the wildlife for future generations. For example, if a builder choses to maintain an area of wooded land for the natural wildlife instead of clearing away all of the trees for new construction. In conclusion, many atrocities occur daily, weekly, and annually to the world’s population of animals. While progress has been made on the medical research front with the use of animals, the abuse of animals needs to stop.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Eating Animals Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In nature, it is kill or be killed. Although humans have evolved to the point where we can devote some attention to honoring the animals that help us build our society, we should not degenerate our society to account for their feelings. One such story of degeneration is of Kevin Martin, a man whose research of AIDS medication was halted by the Swiss Health Department on account of an ethic review that had already been approved by other organizations. (Yong 39) Another example are animals farmed for meat consumption. Although ultimately, they are born just to die, they aren't killed for the sake of killing; They are killed to aid human society.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the reading he mentions that we kill animals for food, clothing, and shelter but when it comes to testing in animals we think it isn 't right. To him one can 't be more justifiable then the other, which is why says we have an obligation to increase the total amount of animal research to protect human subjects and benefit future human patients.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hunters want there to be more land; more land means more animals, and more food sources for the animals to be strong and healthy. Chau also says that populations are “self-regulating” and shelters, food sources, and diseases will kill the animals, therefore he is saying it is better that the animals suffer from starvation and sickness, and a lack of shelter, rather than being harvested by a hunter. It is not like hunters waste them away, they use them as a food source as well.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Ranim Habbal “I am in favor of animal rights as well as human rights. That’s is the way of a whole human being.” Abraham Lincoln. Animal testing is a very controversial issue. Fellenz (2005) said that using animals is not a new activity that humans invented lately, but it is an old method ancient people used to do to learn about nature. Further, people used to kill animals for food; therefore, they learned anatomy and physiology.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays