The Pros And Cons Of Adolescents In Prisons

Improved Essays
There is a debate between the verdict of whether or not juvenile convicts should have a life with or without parole. A child is not an adult therefore their actions should not justify the way they are tried in a court. If a jury is reluctant to give minors the same rights as adults, it would be inequitable to try them as an adult. In lieu of spending millions of dollars to keep an adolescent incarcerated, the parole board can assess one after they have matured into adulthood and decide whether it is appropriate to return to society. Many cases have been accidental, therefore if one did not deliberately commit a crime they deserve another chance. One must consider the distinct circumstances of each offender that should lead to the banning of …show more content…
I do agree with the majority of Supreme Court justices who argue to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles because the human brain development continues well our 20’s pertinent throughout one’s adolescence. According to Thompson “ The biggest surprise in recent teen brain research is the finding that a massive loss of brain tissue occurs in the teen years”(Thompson). explaining that the lost brain tissue comes from areas that control impulses, self control, and risk taking. The frontal lobe plays a vital role in the ability to project future consequences and decide right from wrong. The teenage brain undergoes eccentric behavior that impairs the ability to reason. The loss of brain tissue can be used as evidence that teenagers are not fully developed and should not be tried as an adult in the legal system due to cognitive development. While youths should be punished for their crimes it should be done in a development totally appropriate way according to their age not their crime. It would be reasonable to keep young teens in the juvenile system where the public safety concerns and fellow offenders can be held accountable and …show more content…
Teenagers do not have the ability to watch R-rated movies alone, vote, smoke, gamble, etc compared to an adult subsequently if they are not allowed to make adult decisions or partake in adult activities they should not be convicted as adults. Additionally, children cannot finish their education in jail, nor can they continue to grow like their peers. In jail, children will be isolated from the rest of the world and not be given the opportunity to start over and become something more than their crime or mistake. People should not expect the same outcomes from two different age brackets especially when comparing adolescents to adults. Juveniles are less mature than adults, more susceptible to peer pressure, and cannot choose which environment molds them into a certain way. They still have a future ahead of them and could possibly learn from this experience and help others in the future. According to Gail Garinger “ as a former juvenile court judge, I have seen firsthand the enormous capacity of children to change and turn themselves around. The same malleability that makes them vulnerable to peer pressure also makes them promising candidates for rehabilitation (Garinger)” explaining that with an opportunity a child can grow from their past and have a positive effect on society. Adolescents and children should be given life with parole because of the positive effects it has on

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Sentencing Hypocritical

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This point he makes shows how people see kids as kids only until they commit a heinous crime. There has been much research on teenage brains to see if it has any effect on the teen’s decision making. Paul Thompson, in “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” summarizes research done on teenage brains and found out that during this age, there is a large amount of brain tissue missing, and this missing area affects thinking and emotion which may explain impulsive behavior. Thompson knows such changes in the brain do not account for the teen’s violent behavior, but they should not be tried as adults in the criminal justice…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a juvenile assumes they can take someone’s life and makes the decision to do something they know is wrong then there is no reason to take it easy on them when being given their time to serve. There are always individuals whom do not believe that juveniles should be tried as adults. In an experiment with mock jurors, “younger defendants were perceived as less accountable and less competent” (Semple and Woody 302). Also in the experiment of Semple and Woody, the defendant’s age did not affect conviction judgements; younger defendants’ were given a shorter sentence than the older defendants’ (302). Even though they see that the person committed the crime they do not want to give the same long term consequences’.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They’re young and have life ahead of them, and they should not have to face a sentence as an adult. They make mistakes, sometimes from pressure from peers or sometimes out of anger, and trying them as an adult is unjustified and morally wrong. Making mistakes is the only way for someone to learn; if the young person is sentenced to years of community service or a jail sentence where the minor is not set to be released until they are in their forties, then the life of a young person has been wasted when they could have been learning from their mistakes and possibly making up for it. Sometimes they might deserve to be locked away in jail for life, but in all reality putting them in jail with a bunch of adults is morally…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prefrontal cortex, which regulates aggression, long-term planning, moral judgements and more, is not yet developed in kids. So as a result, children act out in immature ways. In the article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences,” Gail Garinger brought up the idea that he has seen kids change their lives after getting the help they need. Thus, juveniles should be rehabilitated, instead of given life without parole, in order to change and become responsible adults. Another reason why juveniles should not face the same consequences as adults is because it is dangerous for kids to be placed in adult prisons.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juvenile Court System

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Should Juveniles be tried as Adults? Draft #1 Juvenile court systems are the first line of defence against youth crimes. This system is quickly failing to produce the appropriate punishments for major youth crimes passing the responsibility to the guardians and off of the child. Supporting the trial of juveniles as adults is imperative in creating a safe and secure society. The Juvenile system is often criticised for being highly flawed, the system based off of rehabilitation minimalizes the seriousness of the crime committed.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguers say that people only learn from actually experiencing jail as an adult would. In addition, some also argue that a young criminal should not be treated with lenieny at all, no matter the age or any mental conditions they…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brain imaging studies reveal that the regions of the adolescent brain responsible for controlling thoughts, actions and emotions are not fully developed”. And even they shouldn’t be held to the same standards when they make mistakes. Because of these reasons Garinger informs that “the court has previously recognized that children should not be condemned to die in prison without being given a “meaningful opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation.” So they can prove that they can might be a better person, the only problem is that their brain is not developed properly just yet.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teenagers are extremely susceptible, the people and environment they are around greatly influence their decisions. Many people make the argument that because research has proven that the brain is not fully developed until age 25 that is why juveniles should be given a second chance. In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins, she states, “Both sides in the debate about JLWOP agree teens are being tried as adults and sentenced to prison for murder at alarming rates in the United States. But this actually disproved juvenile advocates’ reliance on the “underdeveloped brain” arguement. If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rate all over the world.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Children committing heinous crimes are not a rare occurrence anymore; the upsetting reality requires new tactics for dealing with young juveniles. Some Americans believe children should be tried as adults, yet others feel that they are too young to understand their wrong doings. In most conditions minors are quickly told they are too young or too old for something, however before being sent to an adult facility we need to contemplate all aspects of the case in order to decided whether or not being tried as an adult is necessary. Regardless of the crime, some people feel that an adult facility is not a suitable environment for children to serve their sentences. Philip Holloway wrote the article “Should 11-year-olds be charged with adult crimes?” for the Cable News Network on October 14, 2015.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Young people who commit violent crimes should not be sentenced as adults because they do not have the same rights as an adult, they do not have a fully developed brain, and giving them a prison sentence, or a death…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays