The Pros And Cons Of A Zombie Apocalypse

There are a lot of zombie eating movies out there. Nothing but flesh eating and blood sucking zombies. But have you ever wondered what it will be like being in an actual apocalypse. I am a die hard fan of the television series on AMC called “The Walking Dead”. This show does not clearly focus on the blood and flesh eating zombies, but about survival, finding new territories, and also conflicts. But the pros to surviving a zombie apocalypse is determined by the tools you have and also the people behind you. The main four people to a less dangerous apocalypse would be to have a leader, doctor, hunter, and a chef.
The leader, of course, is like the oxygen of our body. The leaders are the one to make the important decisions about the group. They have to make sure they keep everybody safe and to also be ready to spring into action in case the unexpected arise. The leader is the meats of the foods, so therefore they are the most important. Meanwhile, the leader should be ready to put forth their life for the safety of their group. A leader makes sure his or her members, including children, are safe. Leaders have to make life changing decisions that benefit both them and the people around them. …show more content…
During the apocalypse, there are going to be non life threatening injuries. Even if a person has been bitten, they may need an amputation to avoid the infection from spreading to major organs to avoid transformation. With a certified doctor on board, anyone that encounters a non life threatening injury could be treated easily instead of losing their life because of non experienced people. Anything such as minor colds to a open wound could be treated because I would have a certified doctor on my team. The more people we have, the more we have to fight with. Also, to avoid funerals. Even though there are injuries that’s not treatable, some can be treated with just a snitch by a professional