The Plains Indian Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
We see from the beginning that the Indians did not approve of “the whites” around them but in order to save themselves and what they had left they were forced to adapt to un-natural customs and traditions from the mass migration of European immigrants. A God given right to expand American democracy and populate the western frontier is how they explained virtually terrorizing and dishonoring many treaties and policies between the Native Americans. One of the major issues faced between the Native American tribes and the U.S government was the fight over natural resources. This lead to bureaucratic policies between all Natives in the Great Plains such as from congressional laws; executive orders; and the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the U.S. War …show more content…
Also, In contrast to the whites, the Plains Indians held a different view of the land. They believed that the idea of owning land was not in their jurisdiction to control, and should be used for common use and did not entrust in individual property ownership. From that, we can see it would only be a matter of time until the government and land hungry settlers would eventually intrude on the “promised Indian land.” Strategies such as Grant’s peace policy, Small Reservation policy were established to act as a more humane way of dealing with the Native Americans on the Great Plains. For the Grant’s Peace policy some of the rational goals were to implement and engage in more humanitarian measures and to be less reliant on the military and have strategies to assimilate Indians into mainstream American culture. This aspect of Grant’s Peace policy was designed to concentrate all Indians on small well-defined reservations therefore Red Cloud agreed to keep his followers out of …show more content…
To overcome tribalism and traditional Indian cultural practices, which many officials believed to be an impediment to Native Americans, federal agents created a set of strategies to carry out. With warfare still raging on the Great Plains, the U.S. Indian policies shifted again as treaty making with Indian tribes effectively ended with the Appropriations Act of March 3, 1871. A clause in this bill provided that “henceforth, no Indian nation or tribe within U.S. territory shall be acknowledge or recognized as an independent nation or power with whom the United may contract by treaty.” Thus, no longer acknowledging the Native American tribes as independent nations, Indian affairs were now handled with statues, and to top it off the consent of the Natives were no longer important. The Government established its dominance over the Natives and once again demonstrated the immoral choices at the time. The U.S. government ceased its practice of involving Christian groups in Indian matters and the administration of Indian affairs was centralized in the Department of Interior. Although Indian affairs were no longer important they obliged to appoint an Indian agent to each reservation. Special Indian Courts: The government also established special courts on the reservations to prosecute crimes by

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Treaty Of Paris Dbq

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This was achieved by controlling Native Americans and establishing white settlements after the ratification of the Constitution. Most Indian land was obtained by the US Government through purchase or Treaty. Treaties were used to draw a legal boundary between Indian communities and white settlers. These agreements were achieved through military victories where chiefs were persuaded to give land cessions for riverfront land and easements that the government used to develop settlements for white Americans. Even though Indian men fought in the War of 1812 for the America, frontier settlers’ views were reinforced and Indians were perceived as a security threat.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitution empowers Congress to regulate commerce with forging nations, and several States, and Indians tribes. In the negotiation between the Indians and the government, the Indians acknowledge themselves sovereign nation.as under the protection of the United States government and no other Jackson recommended Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. That act gave the President the authority to give up land in west Mississippi River to Indians that would give up their land to the government. The Law allowed the Indians material and financial assistance to get to their new location. Jackson's government succeeded in general terms.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Articles Of Confederation vs. Constitution Before the Constitution of the United States was incorporated as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Founding Fathers drafted the “Articles of Confederation”, which can be deemed as a “mini constitution” which contained many flaws and inaccuracies which the Fathers attempted to rectify and improve upon. Initially, the U.S. was not actually united in the legal sense – rather, they were a loose confederation of states (hence the Articles of Confederation) independent of national authority and supremacy. For example, the States coined their own money, taxed their own citizens, controlled their own trade and commerce – and there was no President who would oversee the States to execute the law. With these few examples demonstrating the fallacies of the Aricles, we have already grasped a few problems. Firstly, how are the States capable of conducting trade and business with each other if they individually coin different currencies?…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cherokee Indian Dbq Essay

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Besides that, in the excerpt from “Cherokee General …. American People”(1830) explains how treaties never benefited Cherokee it only benefited whites. There are now hundreds of thousands of citizens living the land own by Cherokee. We trust United States Gov., but now where do we go for our protection. (Doc.4) Beyond that, political actions coincided with increasing economic pressures to give these land to white settlement for development of the area.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, the Indian Removal Act signified the violation of treaties set by the First Nations. Secondly, the Treaty of New Etocha allowed for the forcible removal of First Nations while reflecting the deceiving law. Lastly, the Trail of Tears represented the extent of the inhumane treatment all for exploiting their valuable resources. During the 1860s, the First Nations began re-building their lands and lives. However, First Nations lands continue to be taken advantage of by the government.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can hospitality be expected by a guest who barges in and demands to take control? If hospitality is present in such situations, it will prove to be destructive. Similarly, when European explorers entered the New World, they discovered Native Americans, who had already been living in the Americas for several centuries. Undoubtedly, these indigenous people’s lifestyles were influenced by the climate, resources, and geography of this land. As the European explorers began to settle in the New World, the Federal Government played a major role in not only the Europeans’ lives but also the Native Americans’ lives.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    79). The United States were growing more and more every year and they needed more land to settle down and farm. According to Mark (2007) on December 7th 1829, congress listened as a clerk read Jacksons official plea to develop a policy of Indian Removal (pg. 52). For the American’s who were moving out west they were able to move west and settle down and start a family, and according to Stewart (2007) to the settlers the Native Americans were simply in the way, they no longer wanted them to remain there (pg. 80). Even though the settlers that were already out there were sharing land and helping each other out.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1830, Jackson put forth The Indian Removal Act, which proposed that all of the Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west, into Indian Territory. Through this, Jackson believed that he was helping the Indians because in his opinion, having settlers and Indians living in close proximity was not beneficial to either group (“Indian Removal Act” 1). This Act was controversial because many Native American tribes were already promised land, which they were now being forced to leave (“Indian Removal Act” 2). The Cherokee Indian tribes living in Georgia were strongly against the Indian Removal Act due to a treaty with the state claiming that they could keep their land as long as they wanted if they assimilated into American culture (O’Brien 3). The Cherokee tribes had kept their end of the treaty by speaking English and sending their children to schools, but the state of Georgia wanted the land because they had found gold there and the land was fertile for growing cotton.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    White Americans desperately wanted Native American land. George Washington called this an “Indian Problem” and tried to “civilize” the Native Americans by forcing them to convert to Christianity and follow European practices. This did not deter White Americans from forcing the Native Americans out of the land they thought was rightfully theirs. In order to get them to leave, the abuse of Native Americans increased drastically. From stealing livestock and burning houses to the government passing laws that made them leave, White Americans were doing everything they could to steal their land (History.com “Trail of Tears”).…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chief Standing Bear

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Background Information and Thesis When America was still in its early years, Indians had a socioeconomic status less than that of a black person -- that is unless they became assimilated tax payers. The U.S. government toyed with them like puppets for years as America expanded west, forcibly securing them in federally controlled reservations under the guise of protecting them. By the mid 1800’s, all Native American tribes resided west of the Mississippi River on reservations due to the Indian Removal Act signed in 1830. Relationships between Indians and the government had been strained at best for decades. The government didn’t view Indians as human, which, in turn, made them think they could simply relocate the tribes whenever they pleased…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America was slowly signing treaties with the Natives, but people wanted a faster answer to the removal of the tribes. The Indian Removal Act was passed to hasten the process of removal, and many nations ceded their lands . (Indian Removal Act) Mr. Jackson claimed that separating the Natives and putting them on reservations actually helped them from the whites. The Cherokees tried stopping the removal process by pointing at Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia, but Jackson remarked “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.” (Kurtz)…

    • 1981 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    White settlers wanted to expand into areas that were claimed by Indian tribes. Native Americans fought to keep their livelihood and traditions alive, yet were overwhelmed by the brute strength of the whites’ military tactics, greed, assimilation, and disease. After countless slaughtering of their food source and and people, the indian people had no choice but to give in to “broken promises and acts of injustice” (Baker and Hutchins 36). I feel as if none of the actions made by the settlers were justifiable. They came and took land that was never rightfully theirs and told the ones who occupying it first to move when and where.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did you know that the indians had massacred men, women, and children during 1812? The cherokee Indians were given the option to move to the indian territory in Louisiana. So the americans can have the georgia state and that they didn’t like the fact that the indians had killed people. So the americans wanted them to move to an indian territory so they wouldn’t have to kill the americans. They were also given money and a large land but if they didn’t move then they would have to follow the laws of Georgia.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Europeans expanded across the nation the status of Native Americans “changed from a majority culture of peoples living in sovereign nations to a disadvantaged minority living apart from mainstream U.S culture and subordinate to U.S law” (Shaw et.al.2015:31). The model of economic/political disempowerment applies to the Native Americans as seen through the Indian nations loss of land, power, and independence, all of which has had lasting consequences. An example of such model is the decline of sovereignty, in the beginning period of Sovereignty (1700s-1830s) native nations and the British/U. S government entered treaties as co-equals when exchanging demands, doing such over 400 treaties were signed between the groups which suggest that there was a respect for the native communities as being independent nations (Wk:3, Lecture 2). The period of sovereignty declined steadily as Europeans expanded westward which put white settlers into frequent contact with the native population. The white settlers greedily craved the natives land and resources which created conflict that they thought they could resolve with treaties but the growing U.S population proved to be too much to peacefully resolve with treaties.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays