Argumentative Essay On Privacy Vs Security

Superior Essays
Benjamin Franklin wrote, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety”. Three years ago, after the Edward Snowden revealed the massive surveillance program conducted by the U.S. Government, made it clear that we are living in an age where our information is being stored digitally. This had resulted in an ongoing debate between on balancing of national security and civil liberties. The government, however, argues that it is necessary to give up some privacy in order to obtain security which would allow them to combat terrorism.

In this privacy vs security dispute, a division exists between exists between generations, income, and race. Millennials were born into an age of technology. For Millennials modern technology is personal computers, smart phones and the Internet. A study found that “More than 74 percent feel that new technology makes their lives easier, and 54 percent feel new technology helps them be closer to their friends and family. Millenials are embracing technology and it is playing an integral role in their daily lives. Beyond connecting with friends, Millennials are using technology to handle their finances, and trade online. Since all the surveillance takes place on the Internet, Millennials are opposed to
…show more content…
They believe that these surveillance programs increase invasive government outreach. The studies conducted demonstrate that the more security that is implemented, the fewer Americans begin to feel comfortable with it. The reason people are worried about these activities is because they are unaware of what can be collected and used against them in the future. Those who support increased surveillance believe that it is necessary to give up civil liberties in order to prevent potential terrorist

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: Why Privacy Matters While listening to and reading the lecture, Why Privacy Matters, given by Glenn Greenwald at the TedGlobal event in 2014, it because clear to me that this speech presented information that was methodically and strategically conceived to make an argument that would try to change the perception of its targeted audience. The main argument in this lecture is about our privacy when it comes to the internet and its various forms such as services like, Google, or Facebook. The author argues that in an era where more and more intrusion is occurring into our digital lives, people are conforming their actions around the notion that they may be under the watchful eyes of various entities. That’s where the importance…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Executive Summary Today, the millennial generation is surpassing the Baby Boomers and becoming the most prominent generation in America. “The demographic shift is undeniably producing extensive implications regarding social, economic and cultural factors globally. Essentially, the labor market is vastly confronting with the massive influx of digitally perceptive, determined and social job seekers.” (Taylor & Scott, 2010)…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Post 9/11 Privacy Rights: The Case Against Electronic Surveillance In response to concerns about terrorism after the attacks on September 11,2001, the government of the United States enacted new guidelines for conducting surveillance on the public. This paper will discuss the implementation of electronic surveillance as a tool to combat terrorism and will make the case against sweeping electronic surveillance of American citizens and others in this country. Various examples of increased surveillance along with decreasing privacy right will help the reader to conclude that these tactics have not reduced incidents of any type of crime, including terrorism. This paper will also discuss several types of electronic surveillance, including the collection of metadata from telephone records, which intruded on the private lives of citizens and did not increase their safety in any meaningful way.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The United States of America the National Security Agency has been working for ages to assure that the country is safe, but recently it has become a rising concern that they have overstepped their boundaries of American citizen’s privacy by operating surveillance technology all around the country and storing data form every phone call of citizens. With the American Citizens’ privacy at stake, each branch of government took its stand against the matter. The Judicial Branch has to come up with a legal compromise; the Legislative Branch and Congress are working to make surveillance laws that would better please its citizens, and the Executive Branch and the president have agreed to come up with an alternative to Section 215 of The Patriot Act. The Supreme Court has to establish a legal compromise to the surveillance of the American citizens considering it was said that what the National Security Agency/Central Security was doing went against Section 215 of the Patriot Act.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 11, 2001, one of the most horrific terrorist attacks in United States history took place. After the planes had collided with the Twin Towers, the masses of the United States of America suddenly was hit with anxiety and concern. America was prepared to lose their confidentiality in exchange for refuge from whatever dangers may follow in the future. When the Homeland Security Act, was passed in 2002 by President Bush, It showed how much the American people favored the constant surveillance by the government than the danger of being in harm's way. H.L. Mencken, an American essayist, and social critic wrote, “The average man does not want to be free.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the incident on September 11, 2001 we had an act that was passed in haste only 45 days after the attack. We had an act that was passed by George W Bush in a time of fear and unease . Even though we 're trying to protect American liberties from enemies, it is wrong to take away individual rights. One act before the patriot act was Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1968 Also called “Wiretap Statute” which restricted the government 's ability to listen to private conversation, both was controversial because it was signed in 1968 and we did not have the technology we had back then like laptops and cell phones which could be used in very bad ways to hurt or even worse kill people (Patriot)But it also could be a burden for the innocent people who have the government listen on to their private conversations which would take away their constitutional right to privacy. So too little of not listing and to much of listening in on peoples conversations is a bad thing, that 's why we should find a balance between the two so we don 't change the principles we have as a country .…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He creates a persona that society isn’t bothered by it so the reader shouldn’t be either. He attempts to persuade readers that these tools are needed to keep society safe and wholesome. If society were real “okay” with this surveillance one would think that no legislation or laws would be passed to peel back and limit the reach of the surveillance. That would not be the case, though; on June 2, 2015, the USA Freedom Act was signed into law. This act is aimed at protected the rights of citizens and limiting the government ‘s ability to track, store, and monitor us.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some say domestic surveillance has interrupted civil liberties or rights of the people. Many officials like law enforcement, believe this is a great use of National Security for protection. Either way, people will share their opinions amongst each other. Improvements in the future are reducing terrorism, nuclear actions, and criminal affairs in the country. Negative improvements include the rights of people, their disagreement with the surveillance situation, and more laws or acts that will be…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nelson And Rubio Essay

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dear Senators Bill Nelson and Marco Rubio, It has been brought to my attention that the Government has access to surveillance systems that can monitor our phone calls, text messages, emails and etc if needed. I agree that the government should have this right, but I believe there must be some strict guidelines placed in order to ensure the personal privacy of citizens. While discussing this topic, it may seem scary to think as a citizen, that everything in our personal lives isn’t as private as we imagined it to be. But, the questions we all seem to ask ourselves about this issue is, “Why is all of our information so important to the government anyways?” or, “I haven’t done anything wrong, so why would they need to look at my texts or listen to my phone calls?”, and last but not least, “How is this legal?…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Citizenfour Throughout the world, the government scrutinizes citizens without them knowing about it. Devices such as computers and cellphones are being hacked by the NSA and used to monitor everyone’s actions. The documentary, Citizenfour, reveals how the government has expanded its surveillance methods. The government’s secrecy of spying on peoples lives not only declines individual’s privacy, but their freedom as well.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On June 6th, 2013 The Guardian and the Washington Post revealed the fact that the NSA had access to customer information on Apple, Microsoft, and Google computer products. The information obtained by the NSA was allegedly used to prevent any terrorist actions. However, the NSA has “[built] up a store of information on millions of US citizens, regardless of whether or not they are ‘persons of interest’ to the agency” (Brown). Although terrorist plots are a legitimate threat to America, the U.S government has overstepped its boundaries by violating the citizen’s of America’s fourth amendment right to privacy.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the article, “The New Greatest Generation,” Joel Stein talks about the millennial generation and the labels that are put on their generation. Stein tells that over the years, millennials have been labeled narcissistic, lazy, and self-absorbed. Stein proclaims that the millennial generation only cares about themselves and everything they do, say, or think revolves around them. Stein informs that many people, including older generations, believe that the generation is selfish. They are said to not respect authority and worry too much about their self-appearance.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    National security vs personal privacy has been a hot topic post-9/11. President Obama gave a speech on January 17, 2014 where he stated “in our rush to respond …. , the risk of government overreach – the possibility that we lose some of our core liberties in pursuit of security – also became more pronounced.” (Office of the Press Secretary) Due to the tragic event on September 11th, 2001, our government was placed under extraordinary pressures to find the terrorists and bring them to justice using whatever means possible. This brings around questions regarding ethical dilemmas as they relate to security and our right to privacy.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why are we so worried about being watch? It’s not like you’re doing anything wrong, right? Surveillance is a very talked about topic as of the present day. Should the government or any funded entity have the ability to watch us? Ask yourself this, are you doing anything wrong.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Why Privacy Matters

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Privacy is not frequently undermined by a solitary great act, yet rather by a moderate aggregation of little unobtrusive acts. Every act may appear to be innocuous, yet in time the government will be watching and knowing every little thing about us. Solove states that even if you don't have anything to hide, the government can hurt coincidentally, because of mistakes or carelessness. All in all, he fights that when you comprehend the immeasurable measure of privacy concerns connected with government data gathering and observation, the nothing-to-hide argument is less powerful. This essay addresses the ramifications of proceeded with government data accumulation and reconnaissance, before these practices get to be marked into perpetual law as a major aspect of the USA Patriot Act.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays