The Principle Of Moral Philosophy Is Essential For Humans

Superior Essays
Moral philosophy is absolutely essential for human beings because one of the things that makes us human is that we are moral beings, we make moral choices. To make good moral choices we need to think seriously about the kind of people we ought to be and about what the right thing to do is in any given situation. That what is right and what is wrong does not depend on the whim of human desires and delights. Right and wrong, morality and immorality, grow out of what it is to be a human being. Since being a human being is a real, concrete reality, morality is also a real concrete reality. To have a moral theory is necessary to live and thrive, my moral theory is based off of the Principle of Essential Humanness with the addition of Critical Ethical …show more content…
Morality in a typical dictionary is normally defined as, “conformity to the rules of right conduct; moral or virtuous conduct...” Ok, a generic definition, not a lot of help if you are in a moral dilemma. A dictionary of philosophy might go into more detail, but is still quite similar to the beginning definition, stating, “Morality has to do with what is right or wrong, good or bad.” Maybe one way to understand morality is to grow intuition into the kinds of things that make an act moral or immoral, is to realize that we are just beings. We are human beings specifically. What does that mean? Humans are rational, we are capable of logical analysis and abstract conceptualization. This mental capacity is what separates us from other organisms. Humans are also self-determined beings, we are free and capable of making choices, we determine what we want to be, who we want to be friends with, and can freely choose to do good, or bad. Morality is another feature that is distinctly human, because we are rational beings we are moral beings, we can think about what is right and what is wrong. Because of these three features: rationality, self-determination, and morality, we as humans are a very unique. These traits also require us to use them, a moral can implies a moral ought, they obligate us think, choose, and be moral when possible because we are capable of such things! Lastly, humans …show more content…
Being the person one ought to be has a great deal to do with what the right thing is, or the moral thing to do. With some other theories one isn’t sure, or is left without a complete guide on what to do, and this can be frustrating. The structure that CEE uses is simply morality involves recognizing the intrinsic value of humanness, one’s own and that of others, along with actions, reactions, and interactions that reflect an appreciation of human value. Immorality involves a failure to recognize the intrinsic value of humanness, one’s own and that of others, along with a failure to act, react, and interact in ways that reflect an appreciation of human value. With this principle humans can use the rational, cognitive processes that we are capable of to determine and discover what is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The idea of each person ought to pursue his or her own self -interest exclusively to do in his life time for others is known as Ethical Egoism. In other words, ethical egoism states that (i) There are objective moral facts and (ii) An action is morally good if and only if it promotes my personal happiness and it is morally wrong if and only if that action hinders…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Is it the golden rule of treating others the way you would want to be treated? Acting on impulse because it feels good? Or doing your duty because it is your “job” to do so? One cannot determine what is "right" and what is "wrong"; it must be taught or shown to us by means of common sense and unified agreement. At the same time, influence of the self- its own interests, wants and needs- play a bigger role in what creates ones ' moral standpoint.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    134); this stems from the constant pursuit of a morally valuable and just life, basing decisions on this ideal can rule out the best possible outcome for others. Kantian ethics are grounded on the dignity of rationality within nature; the nature of society is such that all moral agents should act in accordance with their duties and obligations (Wood, 1999, p. 3); one must obey the commands of the law even if the authority that dictates the law is unjust as it isn’t the agent’s job to dictate when to act and when to omit to act. Conclusion While Immanuel Kant condones actions committed out of sympathy and actions committed out of duty, he is found to prefer that all actions are committed out of a duty or obedience for a rule or law. Moral agents are motivated by pre-existing factors that have formed through previous experiences, this affects how they decide to or decide not to act in any given situation. There are however, actions that a moral agent is expected to do regardless of their desires.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It ask question like what is morality or why should I have morals. With the meaning of life, it come down to having the right thoughts on what you’re doing in such way to have you think it’s the correct way. The meaning of life is finding the god with in you to make it possible to have the right idea of selecting your right or wrong doings. The good that I believe is proper is what as a human we hold inside ourselves. Our actions and functions as human make us unique.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In philosophy, there are ethical systems in place to help identify what would ideally be considered a universally accepted basis for morality. These systems follow ethical beliefs which philosophers categorize under different sets of moral rules. Two very important examples of these moral systems are Consequentialism and Deontology. They are two different strategies which attempt to identify what morality is really about by outlining the different values of what makes a good and ethical person. Deontology determines morality based on laws which are followed with the intent of being a good person not to be overly concerned with consequences, whereas Consequentialism focusses more on the results, because the belief is that the end will justify…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy. There is, however, a defining difference between morality and ethics. An individual that recognizes the difference between right and wrong and still chooses to do right is moral. Ethics are moral values in action, and this means that morality is apparent in those who do the right thing despite it being hard or dangerous. Utilitarians are of the mindset that one should do that which will produce the most happiness.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They acknowledge that there rules of thumbs, but sometimes absolute obedience to the rules don’t apply all the time. In addition, there can be conflict at times. Moral understanding and moral wisdom are needed to deal with particular situations. According to virtue ethics, this can only be gained through training, experience, and practice. This account of moral knowledge differs from other accounts given because of the way it views morality and what it deems as morally right.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Duty of Self-Knowledge Moral self-knowledge is a key to understanding the self. More importantly, the moral self is what benefits from moral self-knowledge. The benefits stem fromIt benefits due to knowledge which contributes to understanding one’s current mental state. This knowledge is not for evaluating ourselves but rather to decide what actions are right. “The value of self-knowledge does not lie in a determination of why I did what I did—whether or not the motive I ultimately acted on was pure” (O’Hagen #?).…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The formula of humanity is treating people with dignity and autonomy and not as a mere means, which devalues them to the status of a thing. This formula 's main duty is a negative one, to not interfere in situations where an agent can exercise agency. In addition, a person requires positive rights – education, security, healthcare, etc; the ability to be autonomous. The formula of universal law basically states that we can evaluate the correctness of a person 's actions by what other rational agents would do in the same situation. At this stage of the moral theory a maxim is determined; it puts into focus what a person seeks, how they plan to achieve it, and the realization of an end.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For me, morality and ethics are different but relevant to each other. Morality is the proper behaviour of a person in doing right or wrong things while ethics is the human standards to do good and bad actions. When we are doing morality and ethics we will feel happy because we are doing good things that people around us will not be hurt and it is for us to become happy in the future and to do these is our nature. For example, you want to be a successful person so in order to achieve the goal you want, you have to be patient and do good things simultaneously. According to Aristotle, “the purpose of ethics is to simply find the ultimate purpose of life of human person” It means that we act ethically to have the ultimate happiness and to know the purpose of our lives.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics