The Prince Summary Chapter 12

Decent Essays
First I read chapter 5 of The Prince is all about how to govern states that are following their own rules. I disagree with how Machiavelli says to deal with them. One way that Machiavelli said was to devastate the states and I don't think that is the right way to go. If you devastate the state they might start listening and following you but they might also use the devastation you put on them to slowly start turning more and more states away from you causing you to lose your rein over the states. A better way would be to talk to the people and see how you can further help your people instead of hurt them. The second reason Machiavelli gives isn’t that bad to me and I am fine with it. The third one I am on the fence about it because having them keep their laws and providing protection to the state will help it and keep the citizens in the state safe. On the other hand the prince is making them pay a bunch of taxes which can help the prince rule …show more content…
This chapter is all about what it takes to have a good army and good laws. I disagree with the point that you cannot have good laws without a good army and that armies help with the laws. Armies help make sure people are following the laws and not breaking them, but armies aren’t the law so you don't need an army to have great laws. Just like how you don’t need all the best players to make a team because sometimes the craziest, weirdest groups come up with the best ideas and do the best. One thing I do agree with is that the prince should run his armies because an army with a powerful leader/commander will do the best not just fighting but following orders because they are disciplined and believe in their leaders choice. I also agree that princes/leaders should have a strong foundation/title for themselves. When you have a strong title or foundation other people will want to follow you because your name and other countries/states will be scared to go against you because of all the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Rulers are expected to protect the citizens (King George had…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli and Socrates Would Not Support the Same Prince While both Socrates and Niccolo Machiavelli grew up in times of political turmoil and economic instability, Socrates would not be supportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a good prince. Their concepts of an effective ruler are completely different – the extent of their similarities are their experiences with political fragmentation and war. Both aim to establish a long-lasting government, but Machiavelli believes a ruthless ruler without regard to morality is needed, while Socrates would suggest a virtuous ruler is vital to establishing a stable government. In The Prince And the Discourses, Machiavelli articulates what makes a good ruler and provides guidelines for how they should rule.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It is necessary, if you want to master her, to beat and strike her” (Machiavelli, The Prince). In this quote, Machiavelli is referring to fortuna, or luck, as a lady and the individual as the potential master. In order to achieve this status of mastery, becoming a virtuoso, one must deal roughly with luck. In essence, this means that one must be bold and strong in one’s decisions in order to succeed over fortuna. This ability is referred to as one’s virtù.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When is the rule by cruelty necessary, according to Machiavelli? According to Machiavelli, he claims that the prince needs to rule by cruelty, especially in terms of crime and justice. If the prince is generous at all times, including the period of disorder, people will lose trust. With courage and cruelty, the prince should abandon his personal qualities, rule by cruelty, and eliminate all possible crimes and misdeeds for the safety of the country.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prince’s strength is even important to neighboring nations. Machiavelli argues that the prince “should make himself the leader and defender of his less powerful neighbors” primarily to promote himself but also to please the citizens (The Prince, 9). Without this ideal prince, who would be there to stand up and protect the region? Socrates has a similar idea, “who could be pleased with a city without its laws” (Crito, 53a). While facing a death sentence, Socrates argues that breaking the law would do more harm than losing his life.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Republic and Machiavelli’s The Prince depict their views of both the duties and the ideal personas that rulers should strive towards. Socrates, in Republic, strives to discover truth in the creation of a hypothetical “perfect city,” in which all citizens are just and fair to each other. His Philosopher King was designed to rule this ideal city, and as such this is a perfect and ideal figure. Having been educated only in the just for his whole life, this Philosopher King is always virtuous, and relies purely on this virtue to be a good ruler for his people.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the subjects being ruled over thought that Lorenzo was using too many resources for personal spoils, eventually they will up rise and Machiavelli would get what he truly wanted: the removal of Lorenzo from power. Machiavelli explains how Lorenzo should appear to be generous: “I say that it would be good to be considered generous; nevertheless, generosity used in such a manner as to five you a reputation for it will harm you” (338). Even though Machiavelli presents many supporting examples of why being generous is a damning reputation to have, being a prude who is not generous at all will lead to the Prince’s demise more quickly than one who is considered to be generous. Machiavelli also instructs Lorenzo how to keep control of his advisers: “The prince should think of the adviser in order to keep him good-honouring him, making him wealthy, putting him in his debt, giving him a share of the honours and the responsibilities” (345). This bribery of his close advisers would prevent them from ever rising up against Lorenzo, but such should not be necessary.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the ruler leaves behind any amount of dissatisfaction through his means there will always be a certain level of dissatisfaction among the people, creating a rift amongst them. Hence, if the current leader follows through Machiavelli’s theories and practices duplicitous acts of dishonesty he is generating a volume of instability. For example, Muammar Gaddafi, the autocratic leader of Libya, ruled with an iron fist. He would swiftly take down any opposition to his dictatorship and ruled through kleptocracy and fear. While he was unopposed for a long time, eventually the dissent leftover from his ruling caught up to him and he was executed after a successful coup…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He must hurry back to the castle, to his rightful place as heir to the throne. In The Prince and the Pauper by Mark Twain, two identical boys from completely opposite families take on each other’s roles. One, a peasant named Tom Canty, assumes the role as prince. Tom wishes to see a real prince that he has heard about from stories. Whilst Prince Edward Tudor, the king’s son, becomes a pauper.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays