Analysis Of Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

Improved Essays
All leaders, whether a king, prince, or president of a nation or kingdom should be beast-like to a certain extent. In a fantasy world, a prince would possess all the qualities deemed “good” by other men and women, but this expectation is unrealistic. In chapter 15 and 18 of The Prince by: Niccolo Machiavelli explains that there is a difference between how a prince should live and how he lives, but he (the prince) must learn not to be virtuous (also known as Christian virtues). However, at the same time he must put the state’s interest above anything else, but when it puts him at a disadvantage, he can break his word. Therefore, a prince puts on a mask before the citizens giving the appearance of trust, loyalty, and fairness which can fool people …show more content…
Furthermore, Machiavelli elaborates on the idea that a prince must learn from the fox and the lion. The qualities of the fox are that they are strategic, crafty, take the offense side when it comes to the wolves (which is the allegorical symbol of the aristocrats within Florence, Italy) and the prince can learn from the fox how to identify the traps. Though on the other hand the lion is brash, lazy, and defenseless against the traps but can learn from the lion to scare off the wolves. The prince should be equally beast like when it is necessary, but also remain humane towards the citizens because too much aggression can cause citizens to revolt and for citizens’ mentality to change. For example, the prominent character in the book The Iliad by: Homer is Achilles, a Greek hero who fought in the Trojan War, but was taught by two centaurs which were Phoenix and Chiron. This is an allegorical lesson of the balance between being humane towards citizens to a certain extent and beast-like when necessary for the …show more content…
This book also gives us the harsh, realistic, and broader picture of an effective leader that they are not pictured as “good” but that they only appeal good in front of the citizens. However, behind closed doors it’s a completely different story. Many aspects of the book can be related not only to the early fifteenth and late sixteenth century, when it was written (when Italy was broken to it’s own city states rather than as a whole country), but that it can be applied to our society in the twenty-first century that an effective leader is a leader that is build on their own virtu (which creates Fortuna: luck) and is idolized by all the citizens, but also bear in mind that there is a balance between being humane in front of the citizens, then beast like when it comes to protecting their state, and power from being taken from

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In Vincent Barnett's article that interprets Machiavelli's "The Prince" was intriguing. Many readers were shocked about Machiavelli's guide to be a leader, but he was only telling the truth. To be a successful leader, Machiavelli proposes that "the end justifies the means. " Machiavelli's critical manual was meant to appeal to leaders to reach their goal for the greater good.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Whether one is leading a real or imaginary domain, all leaders need some means of maintaining authority. Some of these leaders choose a path of virtue with the goals of the commoners in mind, while others act in a Machiavellian manner out of self-interest alone. In George Owrell’s satire Animal Farm, several different leadership philosophies are presented. The main ruling philosophies depicted in Animal Farm are Mr. Jones’ neglectful ruling, Old Major’s idealistic belief in equality and liberty, Snowball’s actions based on future benefits, and Napoleon’s totalitarian dominance. Although they are the most corrupt, Napoleon’s methods of maintaining leadership are by far the most effective.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a leader who will do anything imaginable to keep power over their subjects no matter how evil it might be? A few leaders probably came to mind, while it may seem like these leaders are ruthless to Niccolo Machiavelli these leaders are the perfect candidates for ruler ship. Machiavelli lies all the qualities he believes and effective leader should possess in his book The Prince. However, The Prince is not Machiavelli’s only piece of literature that describes the effective prince, this concept also comes up in his play La Mandragola which follows the story of Callimaco trying to conquer a beautiful married woman, Lucrezia. Controversy arises amongst readers over which character in the play is meant the be the true prince of the story.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli’s guidelines for being an efficient ruler differ from Petrarch's in that they emphasize fear over love; moreover, Machiavelli upends Petrarch’s arguments by insisting that generosity only leads to hatred. In the 17th chapter of Machiavelli’s iconic text, he emphasizes the importance of fear over love. He writes, “From this a dispute arises, whether it is better to be loved than feared, or the reverse...because it is difficult to put them together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one has to lack one of the two” (Machiavelli 66). Machiavelli argues a ruler should strive to be both feared and loved, but due to the difficultness of doing so, he concludes that being feared is safer than being loved -- that is, in terms of being a powerful ruler.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When is the rule by cruelty necessary, according to Machiavelli? According to Machiavelli, he claims that the prince needs to rule by cruelty, especially in terms of crime and justice. If the prince is generous at all times, including the period of disorder, people will lose trust. With courage and cruelty, the prince should abandon his personal qualities, rule by cruelty, and eliminate all possible crimes and misdeeds for the safety of the country.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote in chapter 15 of his famous work, The Prince that “it is necessary for a ruler, if he wants to hold on to power, to learn how not to be good, and to know when it is and when it is not necessary to use this knowledge” (Machiavelli, The Prince, 48). Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of being crafty and the necessity of being violent. He makes it clear that in order to be a successful ruler, one does not always have to be good; moreover, one should not be good all the time. A ruler can only succeed, Machiavelli notes, when he masters the art of administering cruelty when the circumstances deem necessary. The late nineteenth century and early twentieth century political scientist Max Weber, however,…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The way to have power is to take it.” These were the words of a man that was rated one of the top ten most corrupt US politicians of all time by Real Clear Politics. A corrupt leader could be considered a Machiavellian. Dictionary.com describes a Machiavellian as someone who follows the principles analyzed and described in The Prince. The Prince, is a book written in in 1513 by Niccolo Machiavelli that was dedicated to the Magnificent Lorenzo de' Medici.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Why should a Prince understand how to “use well both the man and the beast”? A Prince should understand how to use both the man and beast ways of interaction well in order to know which approach will be most effectual to obtain the desired outcome. Knowing how to keep the faith and live uprightly will win popularity votes while living craftily can get the job done. Knowing when to go from abiding by the law to applying force is the important balancing act that Machiavelli states that a Prince ought to know well.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In they context, the development initiate the understanding of the beast’s character trait from the beginning of the development of the story. Relative to the understanding in the modern times, the development of the personality shown by the beast would help in developing deeper understanding about the current society. The society is founded on different personalities. In the context of the different personalities, it is important to understand that people might not make decision because they want to. The difference in the personality trait is a contributing factor (Cummins, 28).…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics