Characteristics Of Machiavelli's 'The Prince And In Discourses'

Decent Essays
Great political leaders have often been idealized as virtuous people, having desirable moral qualities that, in turn, make them strong leaders. Niccoló Machiavelli refutes that belief entirely, asserting that politics and morals are not connected in any way whatsoever, and develops a concept that encapsulates the true qualities that define a great leader. In The Prince, Machiavelli gives instructions on how a ruler should attain and maintain a principality, and introduces the concept of virtú as the measure of a leader’s ability to do whatever is necessary to succeed in governing a principality or republic, and the characteristics that comprise that ability, such as prudence and pragmatism. The idea of virtú is present both in The Prince and …show more content…
First, he addresses the natural phenomenon that is corruption and how, over time, a republic that was good in its inception will ultimately decay into this universal state. This leads to Machiavelli’s paradox of laws and customs: “For just as good customs require laws in order to be maintained, so laws require good customs in order for them to be observed.” (Discourses 225) This paradox causes the degeneration of a republic over time, as people become evil and exploit the institutions of their government. Machiavelli cites Rome as a prime example of this, discussing how the Roman institutions of electing people into the consulate and other main offices slowly turned from being determined by one’s ability into being determined by one’s power. “…for those who had the most power, not those who had the most ability, sought the magistracies; and although they were capable, the powerless refrained from asking for them out of fear.” (Discourses 226) Through this example, Machiavelli shows how even good institutions become corrupted over time. He then argues that in order to stop or prevent this corruption, not only must new laws be passed, but also new institutions. Machiavelli states that these new institutions must be established all at once, or gradually as the old ones begin to decay. He then points out how difficult it is to execute these reformations, saying, “both of these two approaches are almost impossible; for it takes a prudent man who can see defects from far off and in their initial stages in order to reform them gradually…” (Discourses 227) Machiavelli once again expresses the need for a man of virtú in order to maintain a republic, specifically a man with the prudence and foresight to anticipate potential problems with a republic’s present

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli advocates that the betterment of the state’s popularity should be the prince’s top priority over doing the right thing. However, he emphasizes that it is crucial…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 15th and 16th centuries AD, philosophers emerged in Europe who were more secular than their medieval counterparts. Three of these philosophers were Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and Pico della Mirandola, each of whom had unique ideas about human nature, and the source of people’s joy and sorrow. Machiavelli and Hobbes were both critical of human nature, each proposing their own solution to the flaws they saw in their society, while Mirandola praised humanity’s potential. Niccolò Machiavelli was a political philosopher who lived in Florence, Italy during the Rennaisance. While in exile, and hoping for political employment, he wrote The Prince, in which he claimed that humans, inherently corrupt, must be ruled by a prince who prioritizes effective government over morality and ethics.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He gives a couple of characteristic that any prince should follow which include being stingy, being cruel, being feared, break promises, and choosing wise advisors. Machiavelli argues that a prince or anyone in the path of becoming a prince should know that a good governance comes from prince that will be able to maintain his power above anyone else without running the risk of being hated by his citizens. One of Machiavelli's most important point is that if the prince had…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, Machiavelli gives an instructional guide on how to gain and keep political power. This instruction manual gives essential strategies on how to achieve political dominance; if one uses these strategies to their full capability, then one achieves complete political dominance over their citizens and any opposition that may rise. Using Machiavelli’s writing is essential for political domination. President Trump’s political and professional career can be framed with The Prince, specifically on his inherited principality, the strategies on keeping these principalities, and how he is not using Machiavelli’s teachings to their full potential.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccilò Machiavelli’s political philosophy writing, The Prince, is a piece of writing that intends to teach an upcoming prince an approach of ruling that can guarantee a lasting period of power. Machiavelli states that the number one characteristic that a prince must posse that of virtue. Machiavelli defined virtue as a way that a prince acquires power over a dominion, and later goes on to add to the define by stating that “it is necessary for a prince if he wishes to maintain himself, to learn to be able to be not good.” (Machiavelli 87), which highlights an aspect of cruelty that Machiavelli then contradicts with an example of the wicked Agathocles. Machiavelli’s inclusion of cruelty in his definition of virtue and his contradicting examples demonstrate his dispassionate analysis and overall apathetic perception on 16th century rulers.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli in The Prince is primarily a practical observer and diplomat analyst prescribing numerous ethical and political instructions to Cesar Borgia for pyramidical maintenance, sustenance and enhancement of political power at various stages of capturing, nurturing, preserving and augmenting power and absolute power for the prince. Hobbes’s aim in his Leviathan is similar to that of Machiavelli’s The Prince. Both are equally concerned for bringing about order out of chaotic civil war like situation in England and arbitrary ruler in Italy respectively. Hobbes is making an all-out effort to create an edifice and basis of scientific foundation for the need of a sovereign power through his so called scientific materialism. That is why he discusses at length human nature, psyche and need for sociological order in society.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This project entails an argument that Machiavelli’s writings did not convey irony in his discussions concerning God. He might have hated the Church, but that should not detract from his Christian faith. Machiavelli’s combination of ancient religion and Christianity fit somewhat into what ancient theologians such as Justin Martyr, Origen and many others did. These men mostly focused on bringing Platonism into Christianity, but Machiavelli considered Aristotle more important. Black argued that Machiavelli was not the next Aristotle, however, this paper would not argue that either.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Machiavelli writes on how a prince is to take power and how to maintain his position (Ryan, 2012, p.364). The concept of virtù is introduced, as an essential component that a prince must possess. It could be translated as the ability, quality or determination that secures political success (Ryan, 2012, p.375). Machiavelli finds an example of a virtuous prince in Cesare Borgia, described as a skillful leader who was only defeated by the negative effects of fortuna (Ryan, 2012, p.371). On the other hand, Agathocles is presented as a tyrant, whose form of ruling was dishonorable.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Machiavelli and Socrates both lived during times of uncertainty, political fragmentation and violence, their philosophies about how the state should conduct itself are in direct contrast with one another. Machiavelli’s the Prince is founded on the principal that if a ruler wishes to maintain power, he should embody the ideology of pragmatism, while Socrates believes the state should follow him in his commitment to moral purity and justice. The inherent dissonance between these philosophies would lead Socrates to be unsupportive of Machiavelli’s concept of a prince, and consequently the political system Machiavelli would recommend he install, despite his apparent change in rhetoric from the Apology to the Crito. Throughout Plato’s interpretation…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli believes that the ruler must take things into his hands and not depend on God to help him rule. The ruler has to work and be worthy of the…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in inducing the transition to a stable republic, the ruler becomes the founding father and will be recognized and glorified as an important figure. This will continue after his death . This goal remains self-interested because of the significant political capital that the leader would receive. Machiavelli operationalizes The Prince as a prerequisite to achieve the republic that he endorses in the Discourses. The Prince is the antidote for the restoration of order and the Discourses is the preservation of liberty.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up in such a tumultuous era allowed Niccolò Machiavelli to examine many cases of the rise and subsequent fall of short-lived governments as well as their causes, such as constantly changing alliances. These experiences led to a cynical view of human nature along with a clear understanding of the objectionable behavior necessary to retain power in politics. His career as a politician and diplomat cemented his very pragmatic stance on human nature and the nature of politics, both of which are described throughout The Prince. Unlike fellow philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle, who preferred to hypothesize based on ideals, Machiavelli held the contentious belief that a separation between politics and moral philosophy was the necessary…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays