Machiavelli Modern Politics

Improved Essays
The Prince is most relevant to modern western politics if the sections about military strength are changed to economic influence. The political sphere has changed from a game of Battleship to a game of Monopoly. Rising to power is an arduous task, and in our current system, the key to securing power is financial influence. Modern leaders utilize economic warfare to secure global status. To make The Prince relative in modern politics, replace financial strength for military might, for in the battle between the almighty dollar and the a-bomb, money talks and everything else walks. Advice from Machiavelli relating to foreign aggressive measures is valuable information for anyone trying to run a nation in the modern world, but only if it is …show more content…
To be recognized as a world power, a country must wield economic authority. America’s robust economy contributes significantly to its democracy and world standing ; officials do not have to worry about domestic unrest stemming from poorly managed economics. In Machiavelli’s time,“... there cannot exist good laws where there are no good armies, and where there are good armies there must be good laws” (Machiavelli). This still reigns true, if the words “good armies” are changed out for a secure economy. To Machiavelli’s point, a strong economy is a direct path to a thriving democracy. The Greek debt crisis provides a timely example. The lack of stability in their economy made it very difficult for the Greek government to keep their other affairs under control, resulting in recent electoral crisis that saw the Golden Dawn fascist party rise to national prominence. The economy is the backbone for maintaining a resolute democracy. Modern democracies have to be run by rulers whom have a strong handle on the economy they …show more content…
The importance of economic security to American citizens eclipses any other issue. Bill Clinton iconically discredited all the work George H. W. Bush did in the Middle East by simply saying, “it’s the economy, stupid” (Clinton). The American public immediately followed Clinton in his fight to reboot the American economy. Machiavelli argues, “A prince must have no other objective, no other thought, nor take up any profession but that of war, its methods and its discipline, for that is the only art expected of a ruler”(Machiavelli). To make this point relevant, one must replace the art of war with the understanding of global economics. Clinton utilized Machiavelli’s principle artfully and used it to become the world’s most powerful man. Economic policy was his main focus for, “it is of such great value that it not only keeps hereditary princes in power, but often raises men of lowly condition to that rank”(Machiavelli). A solid economic plan and understanding is the key to securing or rising to power in a western democracy. The people are well aware of what can go wrong in the economy and will use all influence they have to put a leader in power who has an understanding of economics so that they feel safe putting their precious money in his or her

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, both becoming presidents in an era dominated by private trusts and powerful businessmen, sought to revive American Democracy from its ashes. Theodore Roosevelt, having a semi-conservative perception of monopolies, believed strong American Capitalism could let America compete with the other great world powers. Roosevelt also believed that small businesses should be able to compete with the large trusts, as long as they are aware of the sheer power of the trusts. Above all, however, Roosevelt stressed the importance of government intervention in America’s economics. Redefining the power of the president, Roosevelt established many government agencies and commissions to combat the power of the large conglomerates.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These ideas formed the Federalist Party, originating in the early 1790s. Hamilton 's views for America were ambitious and power-hungry, and from his fears and hopes, for his country, the Federalist Party was born. One fear of Hamilton 's was the people. He believed that the masses were “turbulent and changing.” (MP 163) In saying this, he is implying that he doesn’t trust the people and instead power should be entrusted to the wealthy elite, not only because they were more educated but above all because they were the ones most able to handle national debt. To explain, America had foreign debt as well as national debt to pay off.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He has stated, “How often does material advancement or social innovation blind us to this truth? How easily we learn to justify violence in the name of some higher cause” (Obama 2016). At this point, Obama is questioning a moral dilemma regarding how individuals or states are able to rationalize the terror and destruction of war, merely at the expense of economic gain. In a capitalist society, many states would justify war based on economic gain, and simply attempt to mitigate the effects of waging this war. This is due to the fact that to many elites, war was a large source of income, and it propelled certain businesses and industries.…

    • 2162 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Bates explores the connection between politics and economic ways of transformation in his book “Prosperity and Violence: The Political Economy of Development”. According to Bates political structure and economics of transformation is equal to the study of prosperity and violence, hence the name. Bates claims that for states to advance from a poor agrarian state to a wealthy industrialized society, they must go through what is called the “great transformation”. While all wealthy states had to go through the great transformation in the past to achieve the success they currently obtain today, many states still struggle to break out of an agrarian state in today’s society despite various attempts to do so. The great transformation process…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is important because this is a huge difference between the two with the interference of the government. Roosevelt believes that the government must intervene in this economic crisis because if they do not, then it will continue to go down. On the other hand, Hoover believes that the government is the problem. The government is the ones causing all the issues for the American people and if they were to be out of it, then it would run more smoothly. This all goes back to President Ronald Reagan, who had his own strong…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Politicians were bought in order for big companies to gain an edge over their competitors and start monopolizing an industry. The free market soon became filled with suffering and government intervention, which is exactly from what it was intended to defend…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hacker and Pierson place the government and American politics as the primary suspect for this transition to a “winner-take-all economy”. They assert that the way the government treated unions, the excessive salaries and perks of company executives, and lack of government regulation and taxation as the primary causes of the dramatic shift to the winners having it all in America (Hacker and…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So, what must the powerful citizens of America do to secure their overwhelming control of money and the government? Shut-it-down. Take prejudices against the minority, the poor and paint them as threats to the republic. Granted communism often leads to turmoil and is the very opposite of the American competitive market, but it alone wasn 't what the red scare of the 1920s was…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    However Roosevelt did disagree with the free market people, he believed that there needed to be more intervention on the state level. Roosevelt was a man who believed that the government could make reasonable decisions because he was the one who said “reason over passion”, by this I believe that he means that he thinks that the government can make decisions for the public whereas from a capitalistic point of view they think the economy should run itself without the help of the government. Roosevelt thinks that the government can make the biggest impact on the economy. Roosevelt during the Great Depression provided jobs to the country by making jobs by building bridges, dams, highways, and schools, this is an act of reason over passion because Roosevelt uses reason to create jobs for the people of…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rising Inequality Essay

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kitan Irukera DSOC Essay 2 The paramount cause of the rising inequality in the United States is the increasing importance and power of money in politics. I subscribes to Stiglitz beliefs concerning the purpose of a democratic government; to protect consumers, sustain favorable market conditions and provide common defense. The average citizen determines what should be considered “favorable market conditions “-not the elites. Income distribution is a product of market conditions, and since government regulates the market, I “politics is the battleground for fights over how to divide the nation’s economic pie.” The growing role of money in politics has allowed wealthy citizens to acquire power than modern political theory teaches they should have.…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays