Capital Punishment Affirms Life By Edward Koch Analysis

Improved Essays
We all seen stories about killers committing horrific murders and being sentenced to the death penalty. Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life by Edward I. Koch is an outstanding article published in the New Republic in 1985. Edward Koch was a mayor of New York City for twelve years. Which it gives him the experience to write about crime, and he has also written three books which give him the ability to write an excellent argument about the death penalty. The author gives several points and examples of why we should have capital punishment. Koch says this as his thesis statement, “Because I support the death penalty for heinous crimes of murder, I have sometimes been the subject of emotional and outraged attacks by voters who find my position reprehensible or worse. I have listened to their ideas. I have weighed their objections carefully. I still support the death penalty. The reasons I maintained my position can be best understood by examining the arguments most frequently heard in opposition” (Koch, para.4). The author throughout the article makes strong arguments in favor of capital punishment. Koch wants the …show more content…
There are people who support it but there are people who are against it. But most of the world doesn’t support or need the capital punishment because they don’t suffer the same murder rate as the United States. 10 Reasons the Death Penalty Should Be Legal in all States is an article written by Dave Anderson. It supports the death penalty too. For example, Dave states, “We believe that the death penalty should continue to be legal, and that it plays an important role in our fight against crime and punishment of the perpetrators of those crimes” (Dave, p.1). He also supports how executions save lives, “Yet more research has shown that when the state of Illinois suspended executions in 2000 there were an extra 150 homicides over the following 4 years” (Dave,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He closes his article with this statement “ while capital punishment has negligible benefits to American criminal justice, it has imposed enormous, ever- increasing, and terrible…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reading that quote, I recognized that capital punishment did not align with pro-life principles and that capital punishment was the equivalent of playing the role of God: it is the equivalent of murder. Since the criminal justice system is obviously corrupt, I can’t fathom how many innocent people were sent to death row and wrongly executed. Even if they were guilty, they shouldn’t be sent to die. From reading the book, I also learned that capital punishment is very costly and botched executions happen more frequently than one would believe. Based off these facts, my belief on capital punishment has completely…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The implementation of the death penalty is a tricky and controversial subject. When writing for the New Republic in 1985, Edward I. Koch and David Bruck shared their judgement on capital punishment. They addressed the topic from two opposing viewpoints and challenged the death penalty’s effectiveness and place in American society today. Edward I. Koch served as mayor of the state of New York for eleven years and was involved in public service for a total of twenty years. In his essay titled, “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life,” Koch was adamant that the death penalty affirmed the highest value for human life by being the highest penalty (Koch 486).…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "Capital punishment’s slow death," George F. Will claims capital punishment is unjust. The death penalty is becoming used less over time, but Americans are still divided over whether it should be abolished or not. The movement created about capital punishment has split into liberals being against it and conservatives for it. This article is able to give insight into both sides, as George Will is a conservative who is against the death penalty.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, these two opposing articles on the death penalty, The Conservative Case for Capital Punishment and Why the Death Penalty Needs to Die, both incorporate persuasion techniques…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Arguments against the death penalty can be simplified and classified into the categories of the brutality of the process, along with its morality, and the basic reason of why it is apart of the United States Judicial system. The argument in support of the death penalty has been prevalent throughout the decades and although the times have changed the reasons of why it is obligatory to the safety of this nation's citizens. When presented with the question concerning the necessity of the death penalty, an essay by Edward I. Koch titled "Death and Justice" comes to mind in support of capital punishment. Koch starts with two short examples of murderers who were on death row and executed in 1984.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As an anti-death penalty advocator and capital punishment abolitionist, David Von Drehle holds a completely opposite against Ernest van den Haag’s perspective. He claims that after 30 years of studying and writing about the death penalty, “the end of this troubled system is creeping into view” (Drehle, 2015). David Von Drehle is an American editor-at-large for TIME (http://time.com/author/david-von-drehle/). His publics cover politics, breaking news and the Supreme Court since 2007. Drehle received his B.A from the University of Denver in 1983, and earned a Masters in Literature as a Marshall Scholar from Oxford University (Achenbach, 2012).…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On July 6, 2003, a man, known as the Vincent E. Brothers killed his entire family after church one Sunday morning. At church, he heard a rumor that his wife Joanie Harper wanted a divorce when he received this news he became furious. When they came home from he was nowhere to be found by his family. His family then went on to do what they did every Sunday and that was to take a nap. After they fell asleep an armed man with a .22 caliber pistol intruded the house and went to the back room, then shot the grandmother at point blank range.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stroud III in his entry from the Arkansas law review “Capital Punishment: The Great American Paradox.” In the source material the author goes through actual court cases where the option of capital punishment was a very real chosen possibility. Stroud goes over the factors that go into the imposition of the death penalty, its history of reintroduction into the public mind and issues surrounding the country that leads in modern day executions, The United States of America. Stroud utilizes all these points to his advantage to get the point that the capital punishments continuation should be diminished across. Like myself, the author of the academic journal “Capital Punishment: The Great American Paradox”, A.M. Stroud III, both agree that the concept of capital punishment is not one to be seen as something to be pushed for onward towards the future but instead act as a memory of our nation’s past effectively leaving it behind where it truly belongs.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To kill or not to kill. The legalization of the death penalty in certain states of America indubitably causes an issue cluttered with controversy, yet one worth analyzing. Although I am relatively informed on the topic because of my strong interest in real crime shows and documentaries, I would not say I am biased, for I do not possess a strong conviction on either side. On the contrary, David Bruck, a successful lawyer devoted to the defense of persons charged with a capital crime, offers a worthwhile insight into the discussion. His essay "The Death Penalty" responds to an essay by the Democratic mayor of New York City at the time, Edward I. Koch.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For those whom like to act as if they were God and take a life intentionally deserves to be punished. In fact, other than God whom can punish someone are the jails and prison that house these types of individuals. There are some cold blooded killers out in the world, along with some individuals whom are not mentally able to make conscious delinquent actions. In fact these types of people become inmates inside of correctional institutions that are housed in supermax sanctions have prompted arguments regarding people are for or against the death penalty, the bans on executions on the mentally retarded and juveniles are also addressed. Giving that this world is filled with a very mixed cultural background of all kinds of human beings.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He becomes a big supporter of the death penalty which is dominant in his paper where he list different objections to the death penalty than counteracts them. Koch starts off by saying that the death penalty is simply barbaric. The action itself is not barbaric due to its purpose of killing without suffering. A down side of killing people is you cannot take the death penalty back. Once they are dead its over no mulligans, so it should be difficult to make this decision.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is mainly used in criminal cases when a criminal kills multiple people, he or she is a fugitive of the law, or when someone else has over sixty offenses. There are restrictions on who the penalty can be used against and the reason, for the penalty being put on a person. It is known that there are exceptions to all the rules and for this reason the death penalty should not be allowed in the United States. Imagine being a grieving mother whose child made a mistake because no one saw the warning signs, and no one got him help. It is realized that what they did was wrong but no matter how bad the crime committed was, you cannot force yourself to love your family any less and seeing someone you love punished by death is hard for…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1985, The New Republic released Edward I. Koch ’s essay entitled “Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life” to the public. This essay 's purpose was to sway readers towards a new perspective that affirms the morality and validity of capital punishment. While the article seems effective at first glance, upon further inspection the holes in its message start to become clear. For this very reason, Koch’s essay is a convincing article, yet riddled with logical fallacies and self-contradictions.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He uses the argument to strengthen his own claim, by saying that instead of it being a valid reason for ending the death penalty, if seen from a different perspective, it is even more justification for extending it. He expresses that “The appeals process for a condemned prisoner is lengthy and painstaking. Every effort is made to see that the verdict and sentence were fairly arrived at” (323). This goes to show that the discrimination factor of the death penalty is no longer the main problem, as the state maintains standards as to how the decision is made and why. Koch explains the unrighteousness of those who may be accused not being held accountable simply because of a few who are speculated to be “favored”, as justice also falls under equality, no matter the circumstance.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays