The Positives And Cons Of Freedom Of Speech

Improved Essays
Being able to say what I want rocks! In this country the one thing that is truly guaranteed is freedom of speech. With this freedom some may use it to spread one’s opinion, whether that may be for the up lifting or for the tarring down of something. In this paper it will be mentioning on why we have this ruling in place. Also, what people views on freedom of speech whether they are for or against it. Also, how hate speech gets such a bad reputation in a country that allows a person the right to freedom of speech? As well, the positives and the negatives of having freedom of speech. Moreover, how some people view feels that their basic fundamental right is always being threaten? Additionally, what some bans intuitions have against hate speech in this country. That being stated, does this amendment give people the right to use hate inside their speech. …show more content…
According to thefirstadmenmentcenter.org it stated the first amendment became at America’s ideal concept for citizens to have their elementary freedoms. Our design for personal freedom and the trademark of an open culture, the first amendment safeguards freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly and petition. Without the first amendment, the press could not criticize government, and citizens could not assemble for collective change. spiritual factions could be persecuted, the government might well establish a national religion, protesters could be silenced, the press could not criticize government, and citizens could not assemble for collective change (Paulson). With this country being in the state that it is in, some people might view freedom of speech as a sign to express their true feelings about certain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As long as speech does not threaten harm or danger, Americans cannot be deprived of free speech merely because the viewpoint being expressed is undesirable. Those who oppose peoples’ right to speak hatefully contend that hate speech is an infringement of their fourteenth amendment right to equal protection under the laws, however, this amendment is most often used to argue equality for minorities. Hate speech can be directed at anyone, of any color, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, disability or any other characteristic. In fact, hate speech could be directed at someone who is wealthy or privileged, not belonging to any minority…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And, putting into effect an excessive amount of media censorship can infringe on this on this basic right of the people. Also, censorship is believed to negate the First Amendment. What would be the point of your right to speak when there is nobody listening to what you are talking about? The very concept of censorship is believed to clash with the idea of democracy. By covering the ears of listeners, then democracy and dictatorship would be no…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When you examine the speech in the United States you can begin to see that the country is a very politically correct society. Words that suppress, oppress, belittle, arouse, and discourage others are seen by many in a negative light and are censored out of our speech and ultimately eliminated. In fact, the definition of political correctness found in the Merriam-Webster dictionary is “conforming to a belief that language and practices which could offend political sensibilities (as in matters of sex or race) should be eliminated” (Merriam-Webster). This belief that the world should conform to eliminating offensive language not only oppresses people’s ideas, but infringes on their 1st Amendment right to the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hate speech can lead to direct harm; it is important to restrict it. Although freedom of speech is important to the way our society is run, limitations need to be set. Without this, repeated hate speech directed towards a targeted group will cause harm. Often times we are influenced by other people’s words and actions. Because hate…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case exposes the true paradox of free speech, that, to protect free speech, some of it must be censored. This censorship, however, is, in itself, a violation of the…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Freedom of Speech? The Merriam-Webster dictionary define freedom of speech as “the right to express facts and opinions subject only to reasonable limitations (as the power of the government to protect itself from a clear and present danger) guaranteed by the 1st and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and similar provisions of some state constitutions”. Freedom of speech is ones right to say what you please without fear of being punished, is among one of the most treasured freedoms throughout America. The founders of the United States government tried to protect our liberty by assuring a free press, to gather and publish information without being under control or power of another, in the First Amendment to the Constitution. As we know, the Supreme Court plays an important role in the subject of free speech and expression, and we need to understand that the…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the freedom of speech concepts that this controversy involves is hate speech. The definition of hate speech is that it is a type of speech that insults groups of people based on their race. In the constitution, hate speech is any speech, action or attitude, writing, or advertising which is banned because it may encourage violence or discriminatory action against or by a shielded individual or group, or because it belittles or threatens a preserved individual or group. Hate speech comes in all types and forms of intolerance. Free speech covers the right to convey ourselves.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They temporarily render people unable to focus. Trigger warnings work to prevent or counteract this. Common sense tells us that material that is merely offensive to certain people’s political or religious sensibilities wouldn’t merit a warning. Politics and religion can make people angry. Much of the push against speech codes is from organizations and individuals who also deride multicultural education and oppose affirmative action.…

    • 2267 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The freedom to speech is very important to many Americans. However, many wonder if some speech should be prohibited especially while online. This is because it is harming, slandering, or hateful. The best way to evaluate this issue is through Deontology. This is because every American has a right to free speech, according to the constitution, they also have duties and consequences that come with being able to say whatever they want.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human Rights Are Universal

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This does question as to which rights should be universalised. I can also see that rights are flawed. Even if rights are made universal, people have the freedom to deny them and act according to how they wish; how can you impose rights (which are supposed to be for human benefit) on someone who does not wish to follow it? Rights are flawed because it it dependent on humans- if they are not respected then it 's meaning and point of existence is lost. For example, terrorist groups in a country with universal rights, can either deny why they need rights when they don’t follow the system; or they can use these rights for their own gain.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays