Access to affordable birth control has many benefits for the individual in question. …show more content…
Adam Sonfield et al. found that the advent of the birth control pill ushered in a dramatic increase in the amount of women in the workforce and that a large portion of those female workers went into skilled and professional positions. He goes on to confirm that effective use of birth control allows the woman to schedule her pregnancy to coincide in a conducive manner with her education and/or early career goals (Sonfield et al., 2013). Access to affordable birth control allows the individual to focus on her workplace participation without having to take any extended absences for maternity leave and subsequent health issues thereafter. A required extended leave often causes women to miss vital experiences that would be beneficial or even necessary in order to be considered for a raise or promotion. Extrapolating on this concept, affordable, accessible birth control also has positive benefits on all women’s equality in the workplace. Birth control is not just deciding when or whether to have a child; birth control empowers womankind in a way that men have never had to overcome. In an article for Forbes Magazine, Gloria Feldt, former CEO of Planned Parenthood, has said, “If women are going to have control and power in society, they have to be able to control when they have children…” (Seligson 2010). Birth control represents control over one’s own body. Being seen as an equal would be …show more content…
In a study conducted in 2006, Adam Sonfield, K. Kost, R.B. Gold, and L. Finer found that 1.6 million births in the U.S. were unintentional and that 64% of those—which equates to slightly more than 1 million—were paid for out of publicly funded programs. Conversely, the same study found that only 35% of intended births required public funding (2011). The average cost associated with a publicly funded birth was found to be $11,647, which means that $11.1 billion of taxpayers’ money was spent on unintended births that year alone (Sonfield et al., 2011). After analyzing the numbers, Emily Monea and Adam Thomas purport that if current policies to prevent pregnancy were expanded in a cost-effective way, it could save the government and taxpayers $5.6 billion annually (2011). Monea and Thomas go on to point out that this is a savings that equates to more than three-quarters of the budget for several other underfunded federal assistance programs, such as WIC and Head Start