Analysis Of Slaughterhouse Five By Kurt Vonnegut

Great Essays
People die in ways that can’t be stopped, like falling into a cold lake without knowing how to swim or choking on a piece of chicken that got stuck in their throat. But sometimes you wonder: What if they decided to stay home instead of going to the lake that day? What if they had cut that piece of chicken just a little bit smaller? Questions like that can also leave you wondering in what other ways death can be hampered, for example, in war. Of course, the climate of opinion is that war is not preventable; however, in his anti-war book, Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut uses rhetoric to show how society sanctions war to be cataclysmic and damaging to all those involved.
In the first chapter of the book, Vonnegut describes a visit he had with
…show more content…
Repeated four times throughout the book is the smell of “mustard gas and roses”. The first three times it was mentioned, the smell was the breath of someone drunk and the first two times it was mentioned was the author’s breath himself. The fourth time the smell is mentioned is in the Dresden corpse mines. “There were hundreds of corpse mines operating by and by. They didn’t smell bad at first, were wax museums. But then the bodies rotted and liquefied, and the stink was like roses and mustard gas” (273-274). People often drink to escape thinking about something. The tragedy of war and what was seen in the corpse mines of Dresden was so disturbing that even when he is drunk, he is still reminded of the terrible smell of the dead bodies the Americans were responsible …show more content…
When Billy discusses the end of the Universe with a Tralfamadorian and learns the Universe’s end will be because a Tralfamadorian test pilot presses a starter button. The Tralfamadorian says, “He always pressed it, and he always will. We always let him and we always will let him. The moment is structured that way” (149). Much like the end of the universe, the Tralfamadorians do not try to prevent war from happening, they simply accept that that is how the moment is structured and do nothing to stop it. This is exactly how Vonnegut believes people on Earth view war: inevitable. They believe that there is no way to stop it. Vonnegut uses the words of the movie-maker, Harrison Starr, to illustrate the popular opinion of society: “Why don’t you make an anti-glacier book instead?” meaning there would always be wars because they are as easy to stop as glaciers (4). But looking closer to the Tralfamadorian’s words, it did not say they couldn’t stop the end of the universe, simply that they don’t. They accept that is what is happening and that is the end without making a true effort to stop it, even though they are very capable of changing time. Society now is also the same way. We choose to believe war is inescapable even though it

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “World War Two in Europe was over” (274). This quote from Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five, is from last few pages of the book, which are particularly enlightening as to what Vonnegut’s opinion about war is, because of how he uses his experience from World War II. Using imagery and diction, Vonnegut shows that when explaining war, there is not much to say about it that’s intelligent and makes sense. Diction is used by the author in that his word choice shows why war is hard to describe. Vonnegut’s use of diction is evident in the last line of the book, “Poo-tee-weet?”(Vonnegut 275), because it’s something a bird said to Billy, the main character.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout history, man has shown a great tendency to gravitate towards decisions that end in destruction, especially if the destruction will not directly affect himself. Occurences such as war declarations do not necessarily have to be decided on by the masses, but only a single man’s will. By that man’s will, millions of innocent lives can be lost, his own usually not included. Kurt Vonnegut is a fantastic author that uses satire in order to draw attention and ridicule the flaws of mankind, most of which end in destruction and chaos of some sort. In two of his novels, Cat’s Cradle and Slaughterhouse-Five, damage and destruction of millions is determined by what can potentially be a single man’s decision.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout ? Slaughterhouse-Five?, Kurt Vonnegut uses the expression ? So it goes?. It usually follows a death no matter how it happened whether it be accidental, natural causes or the result of combat. ? So it goes?…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric Countering War

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rhetoric Countering War Throughout history, war has become the only solution to resolving conflicts between nations or groups. War is often something that is started off with tension, tension which is often caused or started due to conflicts or disagreements between different nations or different groups, and it is commonly characterized by violence, resistance, and mortality. A few examples in American history are the American-Indian Wars and the Revolutionary War. These various groups of people firmly believed that the only way they could advocate for what they were passionate in was to use violence to express it. However, in the first chapter of Everyone’s An Author, Wayne Booth takes another perspective into consideration and is quoted,…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After softening up his audience by describing fates worse than death and not finding any warranting death, Vonnegut further disproves the idea that honor is worth more than life by pointing out the fallacy of anthropocentric thinking that ignores the beauty of life around us. The power of nuclear bombs was fully realized in 1945 when the Americans dropped two bombs on Heroshima and Nagasaki killing more than 100,000 people. The awesome power of this weaponry created wide spread fear and the distrust that sparked what became known as the Cold War, and humans became particularly focused on the dangers these nuclear weapons posed to their lives. In this focus, humanity appeared to forget the fact that it would not be only human’s that would suffer…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In doing this, Vonnegut is suggesting that death has become an insignificant part of life, and that its occurrence is only the natural course of nature. By declaring death insignificant, war is even more likely, as death is assumed to be a natural part of war. Additionally, the senseless killing of others during the course of war demonstrates man’s inhumanity towards man. While the actions of an individual have the power to cause war, war also has the power to change the individual. Perhaps the most obvious example is in the way that war can drive once normal men to insanity.…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wars are cruel. No matter how many conflicts are presented in the society, it’s still better to not start a war. War has been always considered the worst solution for any problem, because it has many bad effects on individuals and the society without solving the problem itself. In the short story “Dangerland” by Oakland Ross, the cruelty of war causes the lack of morality.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    World War II was a horrific ordeal. Many people, innocent people, died during this war. There are many war survivors that believe that warfare is horrid and they share how the war affected them firsthand. Many of the survivors of the firebombing of Dresden lent their testimonies of what happened hoping that it would gain public awareness so people could see the tragedies of war. In Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is very true. In these sentences Vonnegut is revealing the truth about war and how nothing satisfactory comes out of war. No Matter how large or small the battle, if there is murder and death, the outcome is never going to bring goodness. Being that this is an anti war novel, the reader will see many examples of this throughout the…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After being captured by the Tralfamadorians, Billy is able to observe life on Earth from a completely different perspective. He realizes that the “Earthlings must be the terrors of the universe! If other planets aren’t now in danger from Earth, they soon will be. So tell me the secret so I can take it back to Earth and save us all: How can a planet live at peace” (116). While living on Earth, Billy fails to realize how foolish going to war is, especially considering the more logical solutions that achieve the same desire; however, with his newfound, unbiased view, he becomes aware of how destructive wars on Earth can be.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Irony and Satire In “Slaughterhouse Five” Before Kurt Vonnegut’s novel “Slaughterhouse five” even begins, Vonnegut is described as “America’s greatest satirist”. Considering this title, Vonnegut must be well suited within the realm of satirical literature. Along with this sense of commanding satire, Vonnegut demonstrates a affluent abundance of irony. Throughout this book,Vonnegut’s novel “Slaughterhouse Five”, satire and irony are masterfully used to create an emphatic and hilarious anti-war novel that which has the likes of one nobody has ever seen.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although he is accurate in saying so, since it is still possible for states to go to war with one another, I believe that society’s idea of war has been reshaped because of nuclear weapons and influences by non-state actors. I think that the question is not whether war is obsolete, but rather what does war mean in contemporary society? It clearly is not the “social practice that was once considered normal” (Mandelbaum 35) due to the irrationality of using nuclear weapons against one another. Also, terrorists and other non-state actors are increasingly reshaping what we believe conflicts on the global scale are illustrated as. It is quite possible that in a few decades, war will centrally be defined as these “unconventional conflicts,” hence initiating the discussion on what war means for the world; and what it will mean in the…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What if we can travel through time just to experience weird events? The novel that Kurt Vonnegut wrote, Slaughterhouse five, has some questionable logic. Based on the characters that appear, Vonnegut seems to have a whacky imagination. Especially when in Vonnegut’s novel, includes aliens and a pornstars. This novel is a postmodern because of the Awareness of Intertextuality, Time Concept, and Magic Realism.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is War Bad

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is no doubt that war is bad. but they are part of our reality. They exist because humans have not been able, after thousands of years of supposed civilization, to agree on basic issues of coexistence. It is the greatest catastrophe that can occur to humans. It brings death and destruction, the slaughter without mercy and carnage, disease and hunger, poverty and ruin in its wake.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dell Theory

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    War is unavoidable when people are interacting with so many different…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays