The Policy Of Appeasement During The Interwar Appeasement

Improved Essays
The devastation in Europe caused by World War I led many countries to be left with little options, and British leaders came to the conclusion that the policy of appeasement would be the best for the country in order to avoid another war. According to Overy, the policy of appeasement was British and French attempts to satisfy the demands of the aggressive nations during the 1930’s, specifically Germany, Japan, and Italy. The interwar years is the time period between each world war, from 1919 to 1939. Appeasement was based on the idea that, eventually, Hitler would become satisfied with his demands; however, this did not happen because Hitler constantly wanted more. The policy of appeasement can be determined as ineffective during the interwar …show more content…
The Munich Agreement was derived from a conference that occurred in Munich, Germany and signed on September 30, 1938 by Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Édouard Daladier, and Neville Chamberlain. This agreement ensured that Hitler would be able to collect the Sudetenland he believed belonged to Germany without the use of violence. The Munich Agreement is an example of British and French attempts at appeasement because according to Overy’s definition of appeasement, this agreement gave Germany (the aggressive nation) its demands without the use of violence. Hitler making this agreement with Chamberlain and other political leaders is an example of his public promotion of peace because this agreement gave Hitler what he wanted and avoided war for the time being without the use of violence. While this agreement did appease Hitler for the time being, it did not adequately fulfilled the policy of appeasement in the end. After the Munich Conference, Hitler felt cheated out of war because the agreement ensured peace and did not give him the war Hitler wanted. To ensure war would occur, Hitler secretly installed military official Konrad Henlein as a leader in obtaining Sudetenland and all of Czechoslovakia for Germany. This is clear evidence of Hitler privately initiating war with his inner circle and violating appeasement policies because the demands he gave Henlein to enforce in Czechoslovakia were kept out of the public image and these demands were to eventually overrule all of Czechoslovakia. These plans inadequately follow the policy of appeasement because they prove that Hitler did not have the intentions of following through with the plans he made in the Munich Agreement. While Hitler did agree to follow the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People felt that giving into Hitler 's demands were the best way to avoid war, which obviously didn’t work. Thinking that the actions against Germany after the first world war were unfair was where the people went wrong, as Germany was able to start a second war after this. This was a perfect example of…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sooner or later, Hitler invades the rest of Czechoslovakia, breaking the terms of the Munich Agreement much like the Treaty of Versailles and that the appeasement had failed. With this is mind, The League of Nations was a good idea and did have some early success but it was a failure as well. The main reason for the great downfall of the League of Nations is not all countries joined, had no power, had no army and unable to act quickly. Then again, collective security was a plan used to maintaining peace through an organization of states, whose members pledge themselves to defend each other in battle. Which had led to the conclusion of why World War II was plunged into war by Hitler’s violent actions and to get through to him is by collective…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since the Treaty was enforced by nuclear powers in our scenario, and rational leaders would be deterred by this fact before violating the Treaty. However, due to Hitler’s ambition for empire, he can be categorized as an irrational leader, so I don’t believe he would be deterred by nuclear weapons. For Hitler, undoing the Treaty was the first step in accomplishing his desire for empire. Besides, at a times when Germany started violating the Treaty, countries worldwide were suffering from Great Depression, France and Britain were still recovering from WWI. From Hitler’s point of view, the French and British were too weak to enforce the Treaty.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The USA hadn’t suffered as much as France during the war and France resented Wilson’s generous attitudes towards Germany. The leaders disagreed over what to do about Germany’s Rhineland and coalfields in the Saar. Wilson had to give up on these issues. But in turn France and Britain did give Wilson what he wanted in Eastern Europe, which was to let them rule themselves. Wilson was forced to give up on many of his 14 points.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This all ended when Hitler felt that it was safe to withdraw from all agreements with the allied powers and to exercise very calculated acts of war. Hitler made this decision on a very thought out principle, that the other European nations would become angry, but wouldn 't go to war in order to preserve the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. He was right, in a major act of appeasement Britain, France, Italy, and the League of Nations condemned Germany 's rearmament, but did nothing in terms of addressing the issue. This tepid reaction only emboldened Hitler as he believed that he could continue to test the waters. A year later, he violated another provision of the Treaty of Versailles and remilitarized the Rhineland.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both had a good argument for each stance. Churchill wanted to keep Germany from thinking they could do whatever they wanted, he felt it would have been better to show Germany that they couldn’t just do whatever they wanted. Chamberlain believed that to start another war was not in the best intentions of Europe. Many nations were still rebuilding from the last war and no one was ready for another devastating conflict like the last one. I believe that these arguments of both men can be related to today’s time.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Isolationism

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When congress passed the Neutrality acts, Hitler’s forces benefited due to the fact that his enemies no longer has access to american made weapons. Political cartoons, such as “Ho hum! No chance of contagion,” exploited isolationist ideals as being naive, senseless, and even childish. Although the dangers of war seem far away geographically, technology provides German military with the ability to travel overseas, making distance an irrelevant factor. Not only does isolationism affect nations in the heart of war, but it also influences average american citizens by preventing possible job opportunities and impacting the economy by altering foreign trade.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Munich Agreement

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The European powers were devastated by the first World War and did not want another war to occur. Therefore, instead of intervention, they decided to appease. Appeasement can be defined in this situation as giving Hitler what he demanded, so that he would not start a war. The Sudetenland Crisis and the Munich Agreement are perfect examples of appeasement. They believed the loss of the Sudetenland would be very minimal in comparison to a war between the whole continent.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This signaled a lack of intent to enforce the treaty or punish Germany – additionally reflecting how the Treaty of Versailles required complicity on the party of Germany to be effective. By allowing Germany to take Austria, Britain and France hoped to prevent…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At this time America was allied with Great Britain and France. They didn’t agree with the bill. He didn’t want to anger his allies so the idea was disbanded but not forgotten. The Treaty of Versailles said Germany was responsible for the war as…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays