Case Study: Defendant V. US

Improved Essays
27. The Plaintiff 's actions are detrimental to the Defendant 's daughter due to the fact that the Plaintiff is teaching her daughter like she has taught her son that the laws of the government can be ignored along with valid Court orders.
28. Both the Defendant’s children’s records demonstrate the detrimental harm that the Plaintiff has continuously brought to the Defendant’s children in her efforts to alienate them from their father. Additionally, as noted, the Defendant’s son who has not had visitation with him for several years now has a criminal record and has demonstrated a total disregard for the law and for law enforcement officers.

COUNT ONE
CONTEMPT OF COURT

29. On Friday, February 12, 2016, the Defendant 's daughter came to the Defendant 's home by riding the school bus that evening she was supposed to stay
…show more content…
On February 17, 2016 the Defendant 's daughter contacted him at work, where she informed him because he was trying to modify custody that she was not going to come to his house on Friday as scheduled and that if he should come to the Plaintiff 's house to pick her up that she would call the police.
38. The Defendant on the following day emailed his daughter 's school with a copy of the order awarding him visitation on every Friday, which also ordered that he was to pick her up at school at the end of the school day. (Docket 444). The school then emailed the Defendant that they would make sure that she did not get on the bus and would be available for him to pick her up.
39. It should be noted, that the Defendant’ was incorrect in that the order did not permit him to pick up his daughter at the school, but at the Plaintiff’s residence. However, it was the practice that when the Defendant was living in Columbia, that he picked up his daughter at the school because the Plaintiff was hostile towards him and did not want him to come to the door of her residence for the Defendant to pick up his

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Husband admits the allegations contained in paragraph 6(a) of the Wife’s Amended Counter-Petition insofar as the parties should be awarded shared parental responsibility; that the parties should endeavor to agree upon a parenting plan and that, if the parties cannot agree, that the Court should determine issues regarding the children; however, the Husband denies all remaining allegations contained in this paragraph. The Husband affirmatively avers that no special circumstances exist that would substantiate an award of ultimate decision-making authority to the Wife. It is public policy in state of Florida for parents to share the rights, responsibilities and obligations of child-rearing; however, in the case sub judice, the Wife seems to believe that she is the sole parent of the children and should be entitled to make all decisions with regard to the children as evidenced by her failed attempt to unilaterally relocate the children to Texas without even obtaining proper consent of the Husband or this Court. It is important to note that the Wife also believes that she should determine when and how the Husband should exercise time-sharing with the children. For instance, the Wife has kept the children from the Husband on two different occasions for approximately one month each time.…

    • 4573 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Plaintiff in this case has failed to form a prima facie case that either general or specific jurisdiction exists over the Defendant. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) was granted and the Defendant was given leave to amend. In order for a District Court to hear a case it must have jurisdiction.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Citation: Croft vs. Governor of Texas, 562 F.3d 735 (5th Cir. 2009). Parties: David W. and Shannon K. Croft: Parents of minor Children - Plaintiffs / Appellants Governor of the State of Texas, Rick Perry - Defendant / Appellee Facts: In 2006, David and Shannon Croft, parents and friends of three minor children, filed a suit alleging the Texas Pledge and Minute of Silence Statute was unconstitutional. Each morning, Texas public school students are mandated to pledge allegiance to the United States and Texas state flag and observe a minute of silence. The Crofts sued Governor Rick Perry on behalf of their children who attended the Carrolton-Farmers Branch Independent School District. The Crofts argue the 2003 amended statute…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name of the Case: Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748, 2005. 2. Facts: After her divorce, Jessica Gonzales was granted a restraining order against her ex-husband by a state trial court in Colorado. The restraining order prohibited the ex-husband from disturbing Ms. Gonzales and her three daughters and ordered him to stay at least 100 yards away from the family home. The ex-husband / father was granted visits with his children on alternating weekends, for two weeks in the summer and for occasional mid-week visits if prearranged between the parents.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I'm requesting that the following multiple issues be addressed,for the said minor chid Mckenzie Jade Bazan. I Jesse Bazan for the record have been unable to come to an agreement concerning Mckenzie Bazan's Day care placement while not in my custody. The existing court order is being violated by Alisha Kovach on multiple accounts as ordered by the Tuscola County Friend of the Court. Currently Mckenzie is enrolled into Child Time which is considered a school. In the last court date that we had Alisha had brought paperwork from Child Time specifically stating that she was to pay tuition for Mckenzie Bazan.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tsimhoni Case Summary

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the United Supreme Court case Michigan judge Gorcyca abused her power on the bench in Tsimhoni Case. The three children repeatedly stated that her father, Omer Tsimhoni, was an abuser. While on the other hand he claimed his ex-wife was alienating him from his children. After Judge Daniel Ryan heard the case, a retired judge, in June 2016 he found that Judge Gorcya had violated judicial code of conduct by inappropriate conduct in the court room. He also found that she has violated all three children’s due process because even though there was no order for them to spend time with their father she still found them guilty of contempt of court.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument 1. The judgement for Appellee should be affirmed because the Appellant’s mother had apparent authority to consent to the search of the shoebox. Appellant’s mother, Ms. Fallsbauer, demonstrated apparent authority to consent to the search of the shoebox when she stated her prior ownership of the shoebox. (R. at 5.)…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enumerated Exceptions

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (F.T.C. v. Nat’l Bus. Consultants, Inc., 376 F.3d 317 (5th Cir. 2004).) Regarding the exceptions, the burden is shifted to Petitioner to establish that the exceptions to the statute of limitations are met and the Court must undertake a “highly factual inquiry” to determine if application of either exception is warranted J.L. ex rel. J.L. v. Ambridge Area Sch. Dist.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On My case was heard in Tulare County Superior Court,Visalia regarding custody of my minor child Ava Phillips-Edwards dob: 02-19-14. My attorney Eric Hamilton represented me and we covered child custody and visitation of my child. I Valori Phillips am the child’s biological mother and have both physical/legal custody of Ava.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The non-custodial parent (NCP), Mr. Robinson’s testimony revealed that he disagrees with the arrears set by Jefferson County; want clarification of all the payments for child support since 2013 to the present day. He stated that he is current and has made payment for each reporting month. The NCP’s legal representative stated that they wanted to focus on all the information that was provided by the NCP. The information clearly lay out everything the NCP is trying to get across; mainly there needs to be a correct accounting of all the payments that has been made and receiving credit for those payments; the NCP provided all the information.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Savitri Bhama

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Which was then appealed and reversed and sent back for an evidentiary hearing. After the hearing, the plaintiff had custody of one child and the defendant had custody of the other. When appealed the court gave custody of both children to the defendant. Procedural History…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Can Montgomery Enterprises be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior if employee Sean Fleming got hungry at work, proceeded to get into a car accident on the way to a cookie store, during an on-the-clock fifteen minute break from his duties as a cashier, that do not require him to drive, and Montgomery Enterprises had an on-site break room with a fridge but without food? BRIEF ANSWER FACTUAL BACKGROUND Sean Fleming (“Fleming”) is an employee of Montgomery Enterprises (“Montgomery”). Fleming works as a cashier and his duties include ringing up merchandise, selling small appliance and renting videos. During Fleming’s work day he receives a forty-five minute unpaid lunch break.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Hassenstab, the father petitioned for the custody of his daughter, alleging that his ex-wife is a lesbian and openly dating other woman. Further, the father argued that the mother committed suicide before marriage suffered psychological difficulties and consuming alcohol, failure to provide a stable home environment for the child; therefore, she was morally and mentally an unfit mother. The court those allegations were not warranted, but the child’s desire where to live, it’s the child’s best interest. Here, the Court questioned the child and…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    PER REPORTER: The parents are going through a divorce. There has been nothing filed in court. All of this started about a week ago with mom having an affair. Dad wasn't aware that anything was wrong.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction In this case we learn that the plaintiff was a successful business woman as she was employed by Musgrave’s wholesalers and she oversaw improving communications between the various offices and warehouses. We see how in 2004 the plaintiff left Musgrave’s and pursued a successful career in horses and horse breeding with her husband.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays