The world around us is in constant flux with conflicts, the rapid evolution of technology and a growing population. New issues are thrown at us every single day. Problem-solving and critical thinking will be increasingly valuable skills in the future. It is amazing to see one of the most ancient disciplines is now sought after by cutting-edge technology companies. Philosophy has been, is, and always will be at the core of human progress, which is why I am enthused to pursue a degree in Philosophy.
I enjoy considering alternative answers to common questions that I am asked. To understand more about Philosophy, I read ‘Philosophy: The Basics’ by Nigel Warburton. The book sparked my interest with absorbing questions, such as ‘does God exist?’ and ‘how do we differentiate right from wrong?’ I especially enjoyed the section about God; I have previously studied the basics of The Cosmological Argument and The Design Argument, but to go back to them and read how these arguments can be critiqued fuelled my interest in the subject. …show more content…
Baggini explained the philosophical concept of each scenario, but did not give a solid answer, allowing me to form my own arguments on each one. My favourite section was ‘Bank Error in Your Favour’ in which Baggini questions whether it is in fact stealing to spend surplus money accidently dispensed by the bank. The book has taught me that it is one thing to make an argument for or against a given topic, but it is another thing to be able to understand the topic being debated and why such facts or opinions are voiced in said topic, thus being able to shape your arguments around them with better
I enjoy considering alternative answers to common questions that I am asked. To understand more about Philosophy, I read ‘Philosophy: The Basics’ by Nigel Warburton. The book sparked my interest with absorbing questions, such as ‘does God exist?’ and ‘how do we differentiate right from wrong?’ I especially enjoyed the section about God; I have previously studied the basics of The Cosmological Argument and The Design Argument, but to go back to them and read how these arguments can be critiqued fuelled my interest in the subject. …show more content…
Baggini explained the philosophical concept of each scenario, but did not give a solid answer, allowing me to form my own arguments on each one. My favourite section was ‘Bank Error in Your Favour’ in which Baggini questions whether it is in fact stealing to spend surplus money accidently dispensed by the bank. The book has taught me that it is one thing to make an argument for or against a given topic, but it is another thing to be able to understand the topic being debated and why such facts or opinions are voiced in said topic, thus being able to shape your arguments around them with better