Analysis Of Descartes Third Meditation

Superior Essays
Descartes has written six meditations on First Philosophy, with some being more important than the other. The third meditation does seem to stand out among the rest as the most important. The goal of this meditation is to find out if there is a God and whether or not God is a deceiver. After reading the third meditation, you take a step back to realize the importance of what the meditation had uncovered.
There are different types of Ideas, which might not seem so important to the whole meditation but they are the basic building block. Innate ideas are one of the three types of ideas, innate means that they are inborn in us or in other words, they come from within. An example of innate idea would be Descartes statement, “I am, I exist.” Another
…show more content…
This argument states that the thing with enough formal reality to create the idea of the infinite is the infinite itself, which means God is real because he is the infinite. Descartes uses this argument in order to resolve what he had questioned in the beginning of the meditation; he had questioned whether or not there was a god. The cosmological argument accomplishes finding the answer to Descartes question by proving through the meditation that God is real.
Another certainty that Descartes was trying to reach with the third meditation is that God is not a deceiver. The idea of God is the idea of infinite, which also means that the idea of God is perfect. Perfection is when something does not lack and for God to be deceptive, would mean that he would be lacking. By the time it is clear what Descartes is saying, he proves that one, there is a God and with this idea of the infinite, two, God is no
…show more content…
When speaking of formal and objective reality, the evil genius has less formal reality than the objective reality contained, therefore, he could not have created the idea of God. If the evil genius did not create the idea of God the only thing with enough reality to create this idea is God himself. The rule of causality also works in disproving the evil genius. One of the consequences of the rule is that something more real and more perfect cannot come from something less real or less perfect. Since the evil genius lacks, because he deceives, he is less real than God. The idea of God could not have come from the evil genius because then the cause would be smaller than the effect. Descartes proved God 's existence. This is why the third meditation takes on such a huge role. The third meditation would be the most important even if it only proved God 's existence because God 's existence is a pretty big deal. This meditation holds a lot of weight because if Descartes had not delivered the meditation the way he did we might not have realized the significance of what he was saying or we might not have realized what he was trying to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The heart has its reasons, which reason does not know. We know this in a thousand things.” Whereas Descartes in meditation 3 says that God exists because only an infinite, omnipotent being can endow him with the idea of God. In meditation 5 Descartes says since he perceives that the essence of God is a perfect being and existence is perfection therefore, God exists. The difference between Descartes and Pascal is that Pascal basically has faith and does not need to reason how God is real.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Deceit

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Descartes) Rene Descartes has throw out five things in meditation one. The first one is his beliefs, the second is senses, the third is being awake, never know when he is truly awake or asleep, the fourth is his mind, and the fifth one is God ( Evil genius). Rene Descartes right know is taking a view as a Skeptic, someone who denies the ability to have knowledge and…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final skeptical argument that Descartes offers is the argument from God’s omnipotent power (Class notes, Week 1). This argument is different from the first two arguments because it is calling into question God’s omnipotent power to deceive us into believing what is true is actually false. Descartes arrives to this argument because after the dream argument he admits that though he maybe dreaming, there are things in that world that remain consistent whether the senses were fooled or not. Those things are principles such as, algebra, geometry and arithmetic. He suggests that whether he is awake or sleep, two plus three will equal five.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes may not be able to know the truth, but this will allow him to not fall for what is false. In his second meditation, Descartes expresses that everything he sees is not real and that his memories, senses, or physical surroundings cannot be trusted. For a moment, Descartes doubts his own existence, questioning whether it is he who controls his own thoughts or if it is a higher power, God, who has control over him. Descartes also denies the notion of body, sense, and mind; he almost denies his entire existence but resolves this statement by saying that if an evil demon is trying to deceive him then…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the finality of Descartes' first meditation, the meditator is already facing supreme doubt of all formerly inherited and empirical knowledge and builds an approach towards creating a foundation of doubt on all previous beliefs. Believing to have called all of their beliefs into question, the meditator still demands reason to doubt arithmetic and geometric knowledge – a knowledge that to them feels most intuitive; a “perfect knowledge”. To this, the meditator raises a hypothesis that applies their belief in god: The meditator's detailed argument is as follows: P1. I firmly believe that there is an all-powerful god who created me. P2.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’s mission in the meditations was to doubt everything and that what remained from his doubting could be considered the truth. This lead Descartes to argue for the existence of God. For the purpose of this paper, I will first discuss Descartes’s argument for the existence of God within the third and fifth meditations. I will then take issue with three of Descartes arguments. Descartes argues that some ideas are more real than others.…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, I will summarize the background of the Second Meditation that Descartes uses to explain his claim. Second, I will express my opinions concerning why Descartes’ argument is convincing. Third, I will make known an objection to Descartes’ claim, and then argue why is it incorrect. Descartes begins his Second Meditation by saying yesterday’s meditation, which is the First Meditation, has left him doubting his beliefs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Third Meditations Descartes formulates the idea of God in order for him to gain a better knowledge of the world around him, and for us to ponder the thought of the all powerful god. Descartes believes that God has left our lives up to us but has created a path for us to follow, that will allow us to “achieve understanding of the fundamental principals of the entire physical universe.” (Cottingham, 48). This idea is known as the ‘Trademark Argument’, because it revolves around the idea that God has placed the idea of himself within…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes’ search for truth begins on the premise of radical doubt. Which is to say that all we have been taught to believe is true is actually false. His searches for truth by eliminating falsehoods and radical doubt is a result of this. He explains this in his first meditation by likening our minds to a basket of apples. To get rid of the bad apples which have started to go off, it makes sense to first tip out all the apples from the basket and put them back one by one, after careful inspection to make sure they have no signs of rot.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Meditation One” Descartes establishes that his…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays