• Home Page
  • Rene Descartes Argument Of The Cogito

Rene Descartes Argument Of The Cogito

Improved Essays
Show More
Rene Descartes as a famous philosopher, mathematician and scientist in seventieth century has introduced a new method for recognising and distinguishing truth from untruth. Descartes believed that this method could be useful for every body since reason is same for all people. The aim of this essay is to demonstrate Descartes’ method in three parts. In the first part it will explain that what Descartes’ method is. In the second part, it will explain the philosophical meaning of this method. And in the final part will explain the relations of this method to Descartes’ argument of the Cogito.

The first thing that this essay will address is about Descartes’ philosophical method. Descartes not only was a philosopher, but also he was a great mathematician. Therefore, he strongly believed that as in mathematics there is a method and rules to gain mathematical science, there should be a specific method and some rules to identify philosophical data as well. …show more content…
As mentioned above Descartes has introduced a method for distinguishing false from truth and this method has made of four rules. However Descartes believed that these rules do not have their own justification and therefore he tries to find justification for these rules. According to Descartes Cogito argument, “I think therefore, I am”, is a strong justification and evidence for these rules since it is the first and the most certain and undoubtable fact that people can gain and it is very certain and firm that no any doubt can shake it. According to Descartes, Cogito argument is similar to a foundation at a house. As a house cannot be built without a strong foundation, philosophical rules should be built on a strong foundation. That foundation is Cogito argument since by this argument everything that is doubtful and uncertain can be thrown away and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Rene Descartes Clear And Distinct Perceptions
    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes Clear And Distinct Perceptions

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Fifth Meditation: The Ontological Argument For God
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Fifth Meditation: The Ontological Argument For God

    First of Descartes wrote a series of six meditations to try to argue and establish his philosophical views. In this part of my paper I’m going to explain the first, third, and fifth Meditations Descartes has to offer, to give you background on this topic. Though there are other arguments, they don’t apply nor impact the validity of Descartes Ontological Argument. In Descartes first Meditation, Descartes says…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Meditation 3 Analysis
    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes Meditation 3 Analysis

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Does Descarte's Dilemmas To Prove He Exists
    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Does Descarte's Dilemmas To Prove He Exists

    Another dilemma the Cogito faces is that, even if Descartes had not used the first person notation to prove he is, all he had to say was thought is taking place. The statement would have been “There is thought, therefore I am”. However, this is also disputable because the premise involves invalid reasoning, which leads to an invalid conclusion. Nevertheless,…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    God And Rene Descartes: The Idea Of God
    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    God And Rene Descartes: The Idea Of God

    Therefore, in this essay, I will be looking into the process of two philosopher’s arguments and comparing them. In addition, I will reveal that Locke’s argument against Innateness of the idea of God could be questionable based on his theory of obtaining true knowledge and idea. Rene Descartes asserts the principle of innate idea in the one of his philosophical treatise named “Meditations on First…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Descartes Still Relevant Today
    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Is Descartes Still Relevant Today

    Cogito ergo sum is perhaps the birth of the modern philosophical movement for multiple reasons. The famous phrase of Descartes’ when translated means, I think, therefore, I am, and was the first of a series of logical proofs that Descartes made to help prove his own existence. Up until this time, the history of modern philosophy had relied on arguments about or involving God. Descartes is credited with writing ““Meditations” as the rejection of medieval ways of thinking and the invention of the modern self (Mercer, 2017).” The “medieval ways of thinking” can be seen from numerous pieces of work, contributed by those like Aristotle and Aquinas.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Descartes Second Meditation Argument
    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Descartes Second Meditation Argument

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Third Meditation Analysis
    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Descartes Third Meditation Analysis

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Descartes Vs Hume
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Vs Hume

    Epistemology is the study of knowledge in regards to its limits and validity, knowledge in the sense of the facts, information and skills that humans can acquire. The basis of this human knowledge has been repeatedly studied throughout the history of philosophy. When analyzing Descartes’ Meditations of First Philosophy and Hume’s Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, it is evident that they have both similarities and differences when it comes to their assessments on the foundation of human knowledge of the external material world such as their agreement that the method in which we have tried to understand the world is wrong. On the other hand, although Descartes and Hume have this resemblance between their accounts, they each have unique…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Truth And Reality Analysis
    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Descartes Truth And Reality Analysis

    For example, something which we perceive with our eyes must be rationalised by our thoughts. His famous dictum, cogito ergo sum, is a conclusion reached as obvious and necessary, not inferred from experience. This was, for Descartes, an irrefutable principle upon which to ground all forms of other knowledge. For us to accept and understand “knowledge” we must first accept our own existence. The absoluteness of certainty required for something to be regarded as a truth suggests that it should be beyond any sliver of a doubt.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Cartesian Dualism Essay
    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Descartes Cartesian Dualism Essay

    Descartes is most famous for his promotion of the Cartesian dualism. However there are many alluring subjects that arises during his meditations, and the problem of other minds is one of them. This essay will answer the question how does Descartes arrive at the problem of other minds in the second mediation, and does he offer an adequate solution to it. This essay will be separated into two sections, the first section will comment on how Descartes uses the method of doubt to arrive at the problem of other minds. The second will analyze Descartes ' solution and evaluate its adequacy.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Argument On Descartes Vs Hume
    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argument On Descartes Vs Hume

    Even though Descartes exceedingly pushes that we not trust our sense when it comes to knowledge after being deceived, it seems almost absurd that we begin to believe that just because of one instance when we were mislead. We must have some true knowledge if we are able to notice when we have been mislead so therefore there is now way that point could be validated. Another way that Descartes can be disproven is that if we begin to search for a certain unquestionable principle then how to we know when to stop searching for that first…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast Aquinas And Descartes
    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Aquinas And Descartes

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Examples Of Appearance And Reality In The Movie The Matrix
    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Examples Of Appearance And Reality In The Movie The Matrix

    As a final point, one of the three elements in Descartes’ Method of Doubt,…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Analysis Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Critical Analysis Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

    This establishes the fact that since it is the mind that holds consciousness, it is what can be relied on as opposed to what we experience through our senses since we cannot doubt the mind because the only way to doubt is through the mind itself. Descartes believes with certainty that he exists because he can think without needing a physical body and essentially concludes to “I think, therefore, I am.” The importance of Descartes conclusion of cogito ergo sum is the differentiation of the mind, the body, and consciousness, and how interconnected one is to the…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings