The Perspectives Of Human Nature And Moral Laws Of International Affairs

1095 Words Sep 26th, 2016 5 Pages
The perspectives of human nature and moral laws of international affairs can be evaluated and found to have similar roots and traditions. Hobbes theory of realism can closely relate to the idea of moral skepticism because of their emphasis on security of the individual. In addition, Locke’s theory of idealism can relate to the idea of communitarianism because of their link in moral ethics rising among nations. Lastly, Rousseau’s perspective of rationalism is supported by the idea of cosmopolitanism, relating by the unity of states through thriving individuals.
When compared the idea of moral skepticism and idea of realism have some slight differences and have a great deal in common. For example, the handout states, “The security of states cannot be guaranteed in a global society.” Both realists and skeptics believe in the “every-man-for-himself” logic, they are concerned about security of the domestic public and individuals, rather than an international community. There is also a piece in the handout that states, “Because of the primacy of national security, skepticism assumes that a radical discontinuity exists between ordinary life, which is shaped by morality and law, and the extraordinary conditions of global politics, in which a survival ethic is essential in a view of the possibility of war and conquest.” This quote from the handout is basically stating that national security is a major priority in the means of surviving as a nation because of the war and conquest…

Related Documents