Rousseau's Theory Of Rationalism Analysis

Improved Essays
The perspectives of human nature and moral laws of international affairs can be evaluated and found to have similar roots and traditions. Hobbes theory of realism can closely relate to the idea of moral skepticism because of their emphasis on security of the individual. In addition, Locke’s theory of idealism can relate to the idea of communitarianism because of their link in moral ethics rising among nations. Lastly, Rousseau’s perspective of rationalism is supported by the idea of cosmopolitanism, relating by the unity of states through thriving individuals.
When compared the idea of moral skepticism and idea of realism have some slight differences and have a great deal in common. For example, the handout states, “The security of states
…show more content…
For example, “... Morality is not rooted in the values and traditions of specific cultures but in the shared sentiments and values of all persons.” This sentence is used to describe the universal belief of communitarianism, but, also applies to the ethics presented by idealism. Idealists and communitarians both believe that people are naturally good and morals come from the goodness of the people. Also, the …show more content…
The idea of cosmopolitanism is that it applies, “To all peoples and all nations; rational in nature because people apprehend its content through thoughtful reflection… It is concerned chiefly with human rights and the social economic well-being of persons.” Meaning rationalists, as well as cosmopolitans, act in the interest of the individuals within states. The cosmopolitan perspective aims to, “...Build a global society by focusing on the well-being of people themselves.” Similarly, rationalists believe in working towards a limited government to promote the rights of the people and creating a strong society based on protecting citizens rights. In the same case, the handout states, “According to cosmopolitanism, states are obligated to defend and protect human rights.” Further supporting the rationalist idea that individuals should give up as few rights as possible in exchange for protection from the state. However, cosmopolitanism takes up the tradition of moral absolutism, meaning, “...The imperative of behavior in accord with recognized moral rules, regardless of outcomes.” Unlike rationalists, cosmopolitans believe there is a certain behavior that must be followed strictly according to moral laws, despite what may happen because of it. Also unlike rationalists, cosmopolitans believe that when other countries have significant domestic issues,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Americans dropping of the Atomic Bomb over Japan under Harry S. Truman Name Institution Americans dropping of the Atomic Bomb over Japan under Harry S. Truman Under the rule of President Truman, USA were ready to use an atomic bomb against Japan. Various options that were suggested to the president for retaliating against Japan, but he decided on the nuclear bomb that has not been in use for a period. Truman based his decision on the past phenomenon such as “the wake of the bloody battles on Iwo and Okinawa. “The essay focuses on the primary objective of the Harry S. Truman, which is dropping the atomic bomb on Japan about the moral dilemma that the president faced.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we have accepted this belief we grow more accepting of the idea that there are no morals that are superior to others, nor rights or wrongs, moral relativism. Pojman connects these opposing beliefs by showing that people do not solely believe in ethnocentrism or relativism, but a mixture of both, even though people would rather define themselves as relativists. There is a certain pride that…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The year is 2015, the world is diverse and filled with lots of different morals and values. Due to the fact America has become the melting pot of cultures it shows most people have become cosmopolitan. People have become more open-minded and understanding of values other than their own. New technology is responsible for spreading those ideas across the world, which allowed Kwame Appiah’s vision of cosmopolitanism to come back to life because it helped promote social change. Society in the past were very closed minded about cultures other than their own because they were not educated about it, they created judgements based on what they saw.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fundamental objective of international law, to regulate the relations between sovereign states, has become a standard to evaluating the effectiveness of different approaches to international law. Various philosophical disciplines have interpreted the importance and usefulness of international law in order to establish a better understanding of how international law is to be executed. This paper will take a thorough look at how two different philosophers have explained the concepts and principles that make up international law. Specifically, analyzing how Niccolò Machiavelli and Hugo Grotius present contrasting ideas of the original principles of international law and propose different ways through which international law should be justly…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean Jacque Rousseau, one of the great philosophers of the French enlightenment, was born in Geneva, Switzerland, and raised by an aunt and uncle, after his mother died days after his birth. At the age of thirteen he was apprenticed to an engraver, but ran away three years later, eventually becoming the secretary for Madame Louise de Warens, who influenced his life and writings. In 1742, Rousseau went to Paris, where he became a friend of Denis Diderot, a French philosopher and the writer of Encyclopedie, the "bible" of the Enlightenment. Rousseau was a creative writer and used everything from opera to novels and romances to explain his philosophy. He believed that human beings are inherently good, but are corrupted by the evils of society.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kwame Appiah, author of Cosmopolitanism, wrote in his chapter, “Making Conversation” and “The Primacy of Practice”, about his idea of what cosmopolitanism means and how it has or can help our society. The definition inferred from the reading is that people need to have conversation to be exposed to the different points of view that others may have. People do not necessarily have to agree with them about anything they just have to respect it and know that it is another point of view. Appiah does not try to create controversy within the examples he gives but rather tries to just explain what has happened in a general sense and does not chose a side to agree or disagree with. It is important that he stays neutral because it would cause people…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Rousseau, the general will is a collectively held will that aims at common good or common interest. People sharing common interest will make a better community, state and nation. He argues that by giving up individual rights and interests, people will comply with the general will. In addition, Rousseau says, that people should build a community to which they completely devote or surrender themselves “What these different interests have in common is what forms the social bond, and if there were not some point on which all interests agree, no society could exist.” (p 57).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    So many of the problems they face today as a country and as a world are the result of ignorance and ethnocentrism. The misguided War on Terror, one of the more important examples in our time, is the result of religious and cultural intolerance on both sides. In her essay “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism,” Martha Nussbaum argues that to remedy such issues, they should forgo their nationalist tendencies and view themselves first and foremost as citizens of the world, or cosmopolitans. Most of her suggestions are well taken, but her belief that “national boundaries are morally irrelevant and that patriotism is altogether poisonous” (Nussbaum 1994) may be taking the idea too far, and in a very impractical direction. In this paper, I will argue for…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby Rousseau claims that people and individuals of society may only acquire the entity of freedom through a transitioning process from the natural state to the civil state, whereby they would have to conform to the general will as the common good. On the…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and Liberalism are theories in international politics that have different levels of analysis. Nevertheless, many key differences and similarities go hand in hand when talked about the Post World War II. Realism is a theory essentially about power and security. Many political actors and states view the world as a dangerous place and only the strong will survive.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism And Culture

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Different cultures have different moral codes”, James Rachels discusses in his article Why Morality Is Not Relative? (160). Moral codes differ from culture to culture and each culture tends to have their own individual standards. Cultural relativism is said to be “moral rules differ from society to society” (18). Cultural relativism can be looked at as a theory based on nature of morality. Each culture has their own moral codes, typically created by their ancestors.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different types of beliefs or the way people choose to judge a statement but the main two that stood out in class was moral realism and moral relativism. It took me a couple times and different ways of reading about the two types to grasp a basic understanding. These are basically two different types of views but they do have similar ideas within them. Before someone can determine which viewpoint makes the most sense, you must grasp a basic understanding of the two. After getting a fundamental understanding you will then be able to determine which view makes the most sense.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realists and Liberalist are often times conflicting on how they think about different issues and the way they go about constructing their own nations. But, institutionalism bridges a gap between the both of them. Institutionalism functions as a neutral territory that aims to diffuse potentially competing and conflicting issues. Realism, being the oldest International Relations theory gives a pessimistic view of human nature. Realists believe that.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics