The personality theory being used is the trait theory. According to Funder (2015), the trait theory is based on the beliefs that every man is similar to certain other men and that it is significant and helpful to evaluate broad groups of separate and distinctive variance, it supposes that in certain actual sense, individuals are their individualities and peculiarities. Personal variances are the components from which personality is formed. Personality traits are not the only aspects that regulate a person’s conduct; circumstances and conditions are meaningful also. Individual variances are not significant and the way in which persons conduct themselves hinges on the circumstance they end up in at the time. When one is still younger, the personality
…show more content…
Situational factors are most fitting for forecasting conduct in particular circumstances, while personality individualities are more applicable to patterns of conduct that continue throughout relationship companions, employment situations, economic choices, and additional life circumstances. Individuals and circumstances interact to produce conduct together. Interactionism acknowledges that the influence of a person variable could hinge on the circumstance, and vice versa; persons with varying personalities can select, or discover various circumstances; plus, circumstances are impacted by the personalities of individuals who occupy them.
The person-circumstance discussion could have been prompted and upheld, partially, due to intensely kept theoretical views and principles. Highlighting the influence of the circumstance suggests individual equivalence and personal plasticity, along with evasion of personal fault, while highlighting the individual emphasizes the significance of autonomy and personal accountability (Funder, 2015).
3. Character or Individual evaluated: Chigurh (Javier …show more content…
Conclusion-tie this into why this theoretical approach supports your description (write in 3rd person, minimum 1 page): This theoretical approach supports my description because the trait theory/approach emphasizes the influence of personality traits. The antisocial personality disorder that the character in the film had is best described by means of the trait approach because it pertains to the manner in which over time how a person’s personality traits impact a persons social relationships, significant life consequences, involving health, and one’s relations with others and their environments. Throughout the film, it was clear that Chigurh’s personality individualities were applicable to his expressed patterns of conduct that endured throughout the relationships he had with others and his environment. Chigurh and his circumstances interacted to produce his conduct mutually. In light of interactionism, the impact of Chigurh’s choices affected his circumstances and his circumstances affected his choices. Also, the personality traits that Chigurh expressed were in alignment with what Funder (2015) described in their description of antisocial personality disorder and also aligned with the description of trait theory (Funder,
Situational factors are most fitting for forecasting conduct in particular circumstances, while personality individualities are more applicable to patterns of conduct that continue throughout relationship companions, employment situations, economic choices, and additional life circumstances. Individuals and circumstances interact to produce conduct together. Interactionism acknowledges that the influence of a person variable could hinge on the circumstance, and vice versa; persons with varying personalities can select, or discover various circumstances; plus, circumstances are impacted by the personalities of individuals who occupy them.
The person-circumstance discussion could have been prompted and upheld, partially, due to intensely kept theoretical views and principles. Highlighting the influence of the circumstance suggests individual equivalence and personal plasticity, along with evasion of personal fault, while highlighting the individual emphasizes the significance of autonomy and personal accountability (Funder, 2015).
3. Character or Individual evaluated: Chigurh (Javier …show more content…
Conclusion-tie this into why this theoretical approach supports your description (write in 3rd person, minimum 1 page): This theoretical approach supports my description because the trait theory/approach emphasizes the influence of personality traits. The antisocial personality disorder that the character in the film had is best described by means of the trait approach because it pertains to the manner in which over time how a person’s personality traits impact a persons social relationships, significant life consequences, involving health, and one’s relations with others and their environments. Throughout the film, it was clear that Chigurh’s personality individualities were applicable to his expressed patterns of conduct that endured throughout the relationships he had with others and his environment. Chigurh and his circumstances interacted to produce his conduct mutually. In light of interactionism, the impact of Chigurh’s choices affected his circumstances and his circumstances affected his choices. Also, the personality traits that Chigurh expressed were in alignment with what Funder (2015) described in their description of antisocial personality disorder and also aligned with the description of trait theory (Funder,