This extreme supremacy poisons the mindsets of teachers, giving them the idea that they are all-knowing whereas students are not. Freire criticizes the ethics behind these instructing methods by giving teachers and their techniques a negative connotation, referring to it as an act of necrophilia since they halter the growth of consciousness, reality and creativity (Freire 248). To implement better relationships with teachers, the intense teacher sovereignty in schools could be dismantled to construct a healthier alliance. Although this hinders the acquisition of knowledge, not all aspects of the “banking concept” are corrupt. This is because it utilizes basic learning habits such as memorization, recall, and recording foundational information. These mannerisms will assist the matriculation of elementary knowledge. Basic core subjects that include the fundamentals of reading, arithmetic, science, and writing must be initiated from some starting point. It’s important to grasp the primary concepts of these topics such as learning what a verb is or how to perform multiplication. It would be extremely difficult and nearly impossible to write an essay for English class or find the derivative of a function in calculus without learning the prerequisites for these concepts. Without memorizing and practicing the initial notions …show more content…
As a result, a median between both “problem-posing” and the “banking concept” should be achieved. Creativity is then cultivated and students are encouraged to form their own individual perspectives on concepts. For instance, take a Women’s Study college class as an example. Teaching the concept of feminism can be complicated since it has a multitude of connotations and definitions, especially coming from a diverse student body. However, if pupils collectively discuss their own personal opinions on the matter, it could potentially open their minds to other ideas since they are exposed to various perspectives. Therefore, reconstructing their own thoughts through classroom