The Weaknesses Of The Patriot Act

Improved Essays
The attacks on September 11, 2001 brought to light the many failures of our law enforcement and central intelligence community. In order to combat these issues the Government quickly enacted a bill to fix some of these issues. This new bill was called the Patriot Act. President George W. Bush signed it into law on October 26, 2001. It gave law enforcement and intelligence agencies many new tools and rules to protect the United States from terrorist attacks. Some of these new tools included making it easier to monitor phone conversations, ability to share intelligence, and it enhanced our border authority. It was passed almost unanimously at the time because people wanted to make sure something like this never happened again, but today it is …show more content…
They recognized that there were many inconveniences that agents would encounter if they sought to keep tabs on them. One thing terrorists could do to stay ahead of law enforcement would be to change their communication devices on a regular basis. They were taught this because every time they changed their device, agents would have to go get another search warrant to monitor their communications. Section 209 of the Patriot Act allows for what it called “Roving Surveillance”. This allowed agents to monitor the individual more than the device they were using. If the suspect would change out his cell phone this new law allowed agents to track this new device and any device they bought after that without obtaining a new search warrant every time. The Patriot Act also made it easier for law enforcement to obtain records from places like businesses or banks. In many cases there was not a whole lot of evidence to link an individual to a crime. So it was important to find out if they had gone to a store and bought materials to make a bomb. They might also want to get bank records and find out if a person had made contributions to a terrorist organization. Section 215 increases the types of records that can be obtained in a search warrant and also the different businesses that could be …show more content…
Many people sight the 4th amendment to the United States constitution when arguing about the Patriot Act. The 4th amendment protects the, “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” Many cities and towns, even a couple states, have passed bills protesting the Patriot Act and they call for it to be repealed. People have all sorts of problems with the Patriot Act because they believe the government is spying on them. Whether these claims have any truth behind them nobody knows, but here are a couple of the most scrutinized parts of the Patriot Act. Probably one of the biggest issues is the sneak and peek section I mentioned earlier. It was put in place to find out information about terrorists, but people believe it is rarely used during terrorist investigation. They believe they use it in regular investigations, which they believe shouldn’t be allowed because that is not why the law was created. Equally as disputed is the government’s ability to use wiretaps because people believe the government is abusing this power and spying on

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Patriot Act History

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Core Objective Assessment Historical background of PATRIOT Act and the NSC-68 For many years prior to the World Trade Center attacks, Brian Michael and Paul Bremer played an extraordinary role related to aviation security. Since that incidence, Bremer and Jenkins have been in the forefront in developing the program, PATRIOT Act, which reduced the threat of the security in America (Finley 4). On the other hand, the Soviet military threat to the America after the World War II was well-known to be hyped for political and financial gains. The propaganda on the Cold War was effective in developing government policy (NSC-68) in order to have an effective framing of all the national conversation on threats and media control (Newman 219).…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Nsc-68

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The act was primarily meant to prevent an occurrence of another World war (Truman Library). After the September 11 terrorist attacks that took hundreds of lives and destroyed properties worth millions the State needed Laws that could create room for preventive measures. The law gave security officers powers to record telephone conversation and the primary goal was to prevent the future occurrence of such attacks. The fact the law offered appropriate tools necessary for intercepting and obstructing terrorism in the US and the world at large (Fin CEN). As much as the United States meant to achieve global recognition through the enactment of the Patriot Act, the primary goal was to prevent the September 11 incident from re-happening.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nsc-68

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This was the first time since Pearl Harbor that the United States had been attacked on home soil. Several weeks after the September 11 attack, the Bush Administration put forth an act to help protect and ensure the U.S. from attacks. The major purpose of the Patriot Act is to break down the walls of regulatory and legal policies existing between the law enforcement agencies and intelligence to share essential, related information. The United States of America is a country that is based upon a principle of balancing the rights of an individual, while still protecting public order.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From this new-founded goal, the Patriot Act was born. The Patriot Act gave new power to the U.S. Department Of Justice, the National Security Agency (NSA), and other federal agencies on domestic and international surveillance of electronics. The act also removed any legal barriers that would normally block law enforcement from sharing the information…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Its intent was to give the FBI and NSA access to more private information if that person was deemed a suspect in terrorism. But since the act was rushed through Congress, there were opportunities for…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just forty-five days after the terrorist attacks of September 11, Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, also known as the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. This act was created with the intention to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, and to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools (The United States Department of Treasury, n.d.). Due to this rapid implementation, many Americans believe that this Act was signed into law in hastily. That the White House pushed it through during a time of fear, knowing that Congress would approve it, even without reading it. Even today, many Americans are fearful of what they believe the Act…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Research Paper

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    By reading “The Patriot Act,” it mentions “… the U.S. Constitution protects the rights of the people to be secure in their persons, house papers, and effects against unreasonable searches.” In addition to that, law enforcement officers get warrants before searching a person’s home because they need consent from a judge and probable cause that an item is evidence. Before heavy surveillance, agents would listen in on wired tapes for committed crimes or an investigation. “ The Act enabled investigators to gather information when looking into full range of terrorism-related crimes including: chemical-weapon offenses, the use of weapons of mass destruction, killing Americans abroad, and terrorism financing,” cited from the article “ Department of Justice.” If the FBI believes that any U.S. citizen is involved in any terrorist acts, these agents will listen in on that person and try to get any possible evidence to stop them.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A provision of the act allows law enforcers to carry out searches without warrants (Collins, 2015). Dubbed the “sneak and peek provision”, FBI agents can search and individual’s home and business with judicial authorization, however, they do not have to inform the individual (Johnson, 2011). ACLU investigators have discovered from public reports that less than 1% of these types of searches happen for terrorism investigations. They have been used instead for immigration and drug cases and sometimes fraud cases (Johnson, 2011). The act has also been criticized for its broad definition of “domestic terrorism” and for using the provisions to prosecute crimes other than terrorism (“What Wrong With”, 2003).…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law enforcement were not the only people abusing this act. Many accused the president and the attorney general of trying to get more power from this act (Kollar, 1). The executive branch of america's government already does a lot of foreign intelligence gathering (Kollar, 3). “When national security is threatened privacy reduction is reduced’ (Kollar, 2). Just like the president, law enforcement wanted to do wiretapping and surveillance.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supporters of the act argue that this freedom of information allows the government to be more efficient in rooting out terrorism and protecting national security, without the hindrances of protocol. However, this is also a blatant infringement upon the privacy of Americans, and has also failed to produce any significant results in preventing terrorism in the United States (“Surveillance Under the Patriot Act”). Fortunately, the inclusion of a “sunset clause” within the act allows certain provisions to expire by 2015, such as NSA’s authority to wiretap, seize of voicemails, and receive warrants for electronic evidence (Kayyali). Therefore, although it was originally intended as a defense for our nation, the USA PATRIOT Act should be allowed to expire without a renewal of these clauses because it oversteps federal boundaries outlined in the constitution, infringes upon the rights and sovereignty of US citizens, and has produced no significant results in the fight against terrorism since its…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    September eleventh changed the way the world views terrorism, the wars in in Iraq and Afghanistan claimed the lives of thousands and we the United States have taken massive counterterrorism measures home with us. The United States Patriot Act of 2001 made significant changes in the structure of federal law enforcement, it was revised in 2006 and in 2004 when the 9/11 commission called for a complete overhaul of the U.S. intelligence system the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan or NCISP set standards for a new system of domestic intelligence gathering and analysis. These changes were made in regards to personal privacy and civil liberties. Civil liberties are the rights given to all Americans under the United States Constitution. The…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    H.L Mencken (1880 - 1956), an American essayist and social critic once wrote, “The average man does not want to be free. He simply wants to be safe.” In other words, Mencken claimed that humans prioritize safety over freedom. That means a man will gladly give up anything, including his rights and liberties, to acquire the protection he desires. This quote contradicts with the belief that America had been built upon.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The expanded authorities prompted concerns between national security interest and civil liberties (Domestic Surveillance Overview, 2015). The Freedom Act is distinctively different than what is found in the Patriot Act, such as further protecting Civil Liberties by ending bulk collection of data, preventing government Outreach, and Allowing changes of the National Security letter. (USA FREEDOM Act Summary, 2015) Secondly, improving transparency and information sharing by…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Privacy Act was passed in 1974 and finally became effective on September 25 of 1975. This Act was mainly passed because of an outgrowth of Watergate reforms and also because of the rapid growth of technology such as computers. The main thing that this Act is known for is that it restricts the disclosure of personal records, much opposite of what the Freedom of Information Act does. “The purpose of the Privacy Act is to balance the government’s need to maintain information about individuals with the rights of individuals to be protected against unwarranted invasions of their privacy stemming from federal agencies’ collection, maintenance, use, and disclosure of personal information about them” (Justice Information, 2017). This Act focuses on restricting disclosure of personal records, give more rights to agency records, ability to see one’s own record if they show it is false and the fourth and final one is establish a code of fair information…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Importance Of The NSA

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A plan should have been in place to deal with leaks to the public of the changes, and a more detailed description of the amendment to the policy should have been created and kept under lock and key. Intelligence collection involves many activities that citizens (lacking all of the facts), may deem unconstitutional. The problem with this is most of the time the facts are not available to the general population, media, and even certain members of the Congressional oversight committees, for fear of an operation leak. Much of what the IC does must remain secret, at least until the aftermath (which could be years later). In regards to the topic at hand, authorization of warrantless wireless intercept by the NSA, the main problem arose due to management failures in the implementation of such a controversial topic.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays