The Paranoid Style Of American Policing By Ta-Nehisi Coatess Analysis

Superior Essays
Violence can be described as the intent to hurt or damage something or someone, which can be done in a number of ways. The group of writings that I chose was under the title of “Cultures of Violence”, and I believe that this heading efficaciously describes the two essays within it. On War by James Boswell, and The Paranoid Style of American Policing by Ta-Nehisi Coates, each tell their thoughts on violence and how they view it within different areas of today’s society. However, I feel that On War is better able to effectively convey its purpose.

The purpose of On War by James Boswell was to tell his personal thought on the irrationality of war. Within Boswell’s essay he describes how ineffective people are in the way they think, or do
…show more content…
The purpose of The Paranoid Style of American Policing was to tell the story of the cruelty of the Chicago Police Department, along with other police around the country. Coates starts off by telling a story about his father being a mediator for a young man struggling with violence issues. He then goes on to tell of a tragic incident that happened because of the Chicago Police Department's incompetence, and how he does not understand why the event …show more content…
Not only did Boswell meet his purpose, but he was able to include better details that back up his purpose by choosing multiple examples of of how war is irrational, unlike Coates who only used a personal account and a tragic incident to back up his purpose. Boswell’s tone was more assertive throughout his essay, also helping it to become more effective than Coates. Although the two essays are about two different things but still deal with violence, I feel that both authors could agree with Pope when he talks about violence saying, “It is as if two towns in opposite territories should be set on fire at the same time, and victory should be declared to the inhabitants of that in which the flames were least

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Is this the real definition of war? I do not agree! I believe his experience went beyond the psychological tolerance of violence, hence as a defense, he is trying to make sense of so much horror. I do agree with Hedges that war eviscerates the worse and the best of human beings from cowardly to heroism. Hedges defines the wars and ethnic conflicts of our times as “manufactured” (The Myth of War, pdf.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The language of war is commonly used by American culture nowadays in order to figuratively express ideas. In the essay “Fighting Words: The War Over Language,” Jon Hooten argues that integrating the language of war in a metaphorical sense will cause negative impacts in the actual world. When readers realize how common the language of war is in everyday language, they must wonder if Hooten’s statement that American culture has learned to casually use the language of war applies to them as well because of the multiple rhetorical strategies Hooten incorporates in his essay. Hooten assertively presents to his readers that using the language of war carelessly can desensitize us to the horrors of war and develop into real events through the usage…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the theme had an equal amount of similarities and differences the majority of these two pieces of writing proved themselves to be more different. These stories describe how war destroys those who are involved. Liam O’Flaherty and Thomas Hardy gave the audience a good, general idea on what war can be like, feel like, and look like, if it be plot, irony, or theme, authors can find a way to describe their thoughts on the…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another study he summarizes is developed by Catherine Wessinger, which focuses on the three broad type of millenarian groups who commit violent actions. Lastly, Walliss also summarizes his own analysis, where it studies the millenarianism’s acceptance to violence (503). Furthermore, these studies that Walliss reviews conclude that religions can stir negative motives and create violence. John Walliss’ goal is to prove to the readers of the occurrence of millenarian violence and the horrific side of religions. Walliss achieves to makes his millenarian violence idea clear by ensuring that any topic he introduces is developed with an example.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hardy and Remarque utilize ambiguity in very different ways to convey a similar idea that war creates unlikely enemies. This idea is supported by the double-meanings of the ambiguous words, which hold two different definitions but still relate to the same topic. Specifically in the last stanza of “The Man He Killed”, Hardy arrives at a thoughtful conclusion about war, writing, “Yes; quaint and curious war is!” (17). The ambiguity in his assertion lies in the word “quaint”, which has a double meaning of both ‘unusual’ and ‘old-fashioned’. Hardy uses the word “quaint” as meaning ‘unusual’ by implying that the soldiers are made to perform actions which regular civilians would not do in their whole life; for example, soldiers are made to kill…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As previously noted, Cooke has a fiery attitude within his piece and this adds to it in numerous ways. It establishes credibility in him as an author. When noting this fiery side, a reader can conclude that he cares deeply about the topic and that he clearly knows right from wrong. “A more important question, though, is this: What precisely has led our smartest-ever president to believe that the bill he considered vital would help prevent future massacres?” (Cooke 4). Cooke attacks Congress and the President throughout his piece as a way to show how Congress lacks in passing effective legislation.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But violence is terrible, even its efficiency is obvious. Then, the author lists some solutions to replace violence, but each solutions has problems. Finally, violence is still the best way to deal with the political issues. The author uses some historical facts about wars or violence to support his opinion. Besides, he uses Hobbes’ words to improve credibility.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I developed this reasoning through a combination of consequentialism and realism. This stems from my belief that terrorists can be negotiated with but with the challenge of separating their extreme hatred from their intrinsically human self-interest. I believe that states should try and understand where the insurgents’ hatred stems from because most…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Wilfred Owen uses anger in many of his poems to show the horror and reality of war. Within this essay, I will be comparing the ways in which Owen expresses anger at the war. I will also be exploring the connections in relation both to the situations and feelings described and to the…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author makes use of rhetorical questions to get the reader to start thinking about the idea of barbarism and civilization. The author introduces the violence in the destruction of the two twin towers using rhetorical question such as: “What was the point of finishing so laboriously insignificant a task as mine?” Through the use of rhetorical question like the one above, the author gets the reader to think about the significance of the act of barbarism that has occurred. The author goes as far as to suggest that one’s laborious work is insignificant compared to the act of barbarism that has occurred. This gets the readers to give serious consideration to barbaric situation. Few paragraphs later, the author again makes the use of rhetorical question.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays