distinction of and variation with Homo sapiens across the world in the late twentieth century.
Since the emergence of life men have discussed palaeoanthropology and theories regarding the heritage of pre-existing Homo sapiens. It was believed that there were two different theories to the migration, whether or not they are true or just myths. One follows the concept of multiregional continuity and the other that suggests a single origin for modern humans. ’The ‘Out of Africa’ theory believed that humans migrated from Africa to Eurasia replacing all Homo erectus, in contrast to the ‘Multiregional Continuity Theory’ which asserts that the Homo erectus, after leaving Africa were divided into different continents in the world where they slowly evolved …show more content…
As of today, those who have analysed this fossil believe that the cranium of the Petralona belongs to an ancient hominid eminent from the Homo erectus, from both the classic Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans, subsequently having similar human characteristics with strong European traits. This skull which can either be said to be related to a Homo sapiens or part Homo sapiens has an undeviating clash with the Out of Africa theory of human evolution. The progression of humans and their development over the glove over the past century have been explicit discoveries in the human evolutionary studies. As the theory states, the pre-decisive Homo sapiens who evolved from Africa approximately 300,000 years ago once migrated out Africa throughout the western continents of Europe and Asia. As more and more research has been conducted closely related to this issue, it is becoming more difficult for scientists agree with this evolutional process, leading them closer towards the Multiregional continuity theory. After further research was developed, it was clearly seen that Homo sapiens inhabited the region long before the Out of Africa
Since the emergence of life men have discussed palaeoanthropology and theories regarding the heritage of pre-existing Homo sapiens. It was believed that there were two different theories to the migration, whether or not they are true or just myths. One follows the concept of multiregional continuity and the other that suggests a single origin for modern humans. ’The ‘Out of Africa’ theory believed that humans migrated from Africa to Eurasia replacing all Homo erectus, in contrast to the ‘Multiregional Continuity Theory’ which asserts that the Homo erectus, after leaving Africa were divided into different continents in the world where they slowly evolved …show more content…
As of today, those who have analysed this fossil believe that the cranium of the Petralona belongs to an ancient hominid eminent from the Homo erectus, from both the classic Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans, subsequently having similar human characteristics with strong European traits. This skull which can either be said to be related to a Homo sapiens or part Homo sapiens has an undeviating clash with the Out of Africa theory of human evolution. The progression of humans and their development over the glove over the past century have been explicit discoveries in the human evolutionary studies. As the theory states, the pre-decisive Homo sapiens who evolved from Africa approximately 300,000 years ago once migrated out Africa throughout the western continents of Europe and Asia. As more and more research has been conducted closely related to this issue, it is becoming more difficult for scientists agree with this evolutional process, leading them closer towards the Multiregional continuity theory. After further research was developed, it was clearly seen that Homo sapiens inhabited the region long before the Out of Africa