The Origins Of Law: The Origin Of Family

Improved Essays
When discussing the origin of law with close friends or relatives, you may soon discover that everyone has a different opinion on the source of law and how it emerged. Did law first come into practice when we started to have conflicts among fellow human beings? Or has law been on this earth since the beginning of time. After the consideration of the origin of law, we then also have to consider the development of the legal system. Law is a very complex subject; It has different meanings and parts to the word. When most people think of the word law, they picture a court room with a lawyer defending his/her client, while talking to the very stern looking judge. But in fact law doesn’t have to be about court rooms and judges it can be as simple as the rules or regulations we follow on a daily basis as we are living our complex lives. …show more content…
Did law just appear out of thin air when the earth was created or was it created through the centuries when human civilization started to appear? Without laws there would be no peace. I think without the laws put into place countries would not be able to function peacefully. Back when cavemen were roaming the earth with the dinosaurs, even though they might not have had formal laws put into place, I feel as though they would have had informal rules that were agreed on and followed by their group/tribe. As centuries passed and humans started to dominate earth and create their own colonies and countries, different laws were create based off of their own needs and what best suits their living styles. Without the origin of law there would be no laws or legal systems. It truly was the foundation of our laws here today and even the laws all over the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    It is only natural that we need law due to humans needing organization whether written or just oral…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common law is the development of systems and rules to articulate a decision based on precedent, tradition and customs. History has developed, through these techniques, to create an ideology that results in a massive grey area within the words. Laws have and will always be words on a piece of paper, the customs of the laws are unique. These customs, precedents, and traditions have created institutional inequality built into the architecture of law. This relationship is presented by Galanter, Derrick Bell, and Austin Sarat.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Legal Pluralism

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Introduction I will present how the Supreme Court of Canada handles the competition between normative orders. This paper will consist of a brief summary of the case, the decisions of the judges and what drove them to this decision alongside a mixture of Brian Tamanaha’s (author of Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global) point of view concerning this case in an indirect manner. I will also answer three complicated questions concerning this case. First of all, in order to better understand this case, we will have to have basic knowledge concerning this case. Starting with the appellants, which are the Sikh boy (Gurbaj Singh Multani, in this text will referred to as G) and his father (Balvir Singh Multani, will be refer…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Laws promote conformity and strip humans of individuality. Humans are born with emotion and free will. Mankind is supposed to be able to make choices, to use their intuition to solve problems. Laws suppress these characteristics. By telling us what to do and how to act, laws effectively turn people into beings no more autonomous than programmed machines.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The interviewees often thought of themselves as coming “before the law,” and in an oppositional relationship in which they were in a bureaucratic, definitional remove, with no ability to affect the law, nor did they have the aptitude to define its meaning purpose, or ends. This is the most original to traditional notion of the law as well as being objective, and as an external apparatus operating on society and individuals. The Rule of law is seen as a buffer between the individual and their society. This is law and society- life definition in the formal sense, and not a legal consciousness or…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Post-14th Amendment

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States is a country founded and built around law. A significant amount of the country’s founding fathers were lawyers. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton were all lawyers. It is no coincidence that the most important documents in the country specifically lay out the law for the protection of its people. The founders drafted an ingenious system; one of which the world had never seen.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Corey Shdaimah's Analysis

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Corey Shdaimah’s piece, “Intersection Identities: Cause Lawyers as Legal Professionals and Social Movements Actors,” the perspective of the lawyer is amplified. Shdaimah is interested in the understanding that lawyers have regarding their role in social movements. The author interviews several lawyers from various social movements to investigate how they place themselves within the causes they fight for. The piece begins by outlining methods of how lawyers chose law as a means for social change, and it concludes by showcasing perspectives from lawyers on how they see themselves within their respective social movements. The author argues that contrary to popular belief, many cause lawyers truly care about their issues, and are not only in…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that laws are something that were created to help people. Most of the help is figuring out who is right, how to handle something, or rules to follow (Behl, 2016). Hardly anyone would argue that this is a bad thing, until the law itself breaks the rules. Many laws can, in fact, contradict themselves. An example of this is the juvenile justice system and being able to wave the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law originated from majority’s habit, and intended to raise fairness and justice to the world. Just like Roman Empire desired to reinforce its strength by using Law of the Twelve Tables. This ‘code’ from Ancient Rome mainly based on their behavior and their social value back then. However, as more and more people attracted to Rome, the main purpose of this law had been twisted. They began used this law to reinforce their autocracy and oppression toward slaves and women.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laws sets a barrier to which we can make decisions on our own and pushes us to our own boundaries. In particular this relates to me because there was this moment in my life where a law limited my decision making. I wanted to make the decision to drink alcohol to have…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Natural law is the belief that law, and morality are intertwined. There are several notable theorists whom believe that natural law should be applied to our legal system and to the law-making bodies. St. Thomas Aquinas and lon Fuller both represent ancient and modern natural law respectively and both believe that natural law should be applicable to our society. On the other hand, legal positivism is the belief that law, and morality are two separate entities. Some notable theorists that believe legal positivism should be applied to our legal system as well as to our law-making bodies include, H.L.A Hart and Dworkin.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of ‘law’ has proven itself a tricky one to articulate. Despite its relevance within society, it is hard to condense the idea of law down to its core tenets. In their quest for a concise definition, legal theorists have approached law from different angles, and have tended to divide themselves into two groups – those who believe that any summation of law must include reference to morality, and those who believe that the idea of law either can or must be completely distinguished from any moral considerations. This essay will consider the views of hard and soft legal positivists Joseph Raz and H.L.A. Hart, and natural law theorist Thomas Aquinas, in order to argue that, while all of these theories capture something of the relationship…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    has a tendency to cloud the likelihood of censuring law on other than absolutely moral grounds. In any case, the truth of the matter is that law must be assessed by reference to its viability, general accommodation, straightforwardness and numerous different components, and in addition by reference to the requests of Justice and ethical quality. If two people disputing about the morality of euthanasia were to agree to accept the verdict of a third party, any finality so obtained would be illusory. For even after judgment was given either party could still question the moral correctness of the “judge’s” verdict. Moral disputes, unlike legal disputes, remain permanently open.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics