The Origin And Nature Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

Superior Essays
Plato’s The Republic, is a complex work that discusses the nature of man, justice, the soul and a just society. The city of Athens was on the verge of ruin after Socrates trial and execution. Plato considers justice to be interconnected with goodness of an individual and a state, thus being the best way for survival. This paper will discuss justice and injustice as exemplified in Plato’s description of the fall of the state and the individual. The conversation begins with Glaucon and Adeimantus reopening the belief that justice has its valid meaning and “demand a proof that justice is not merely useful as bringing external rewards, but intrinsically good as an inward state of the soul” (Pg 41). The points risen by both Glaucon and Adeimantus …show more content…
This makes one self-motivating, good and consistent in the society with themselves and others. Justice becomes the sole front of internal harmony and good in a society. The origin and nature of justice is an arrangement that one comes to and is only valuable as it keeps a certain kind of order, predictability and safety. Plato claims that anyone who embraces justice is better off in times of despair and misfortune. He asserts that it is more advantageous for one to be just than unjust because that affects the human soul. Plato states that the highest element of the human soul is “rational.” Plato praises that the nature of good guides one’s actions and their moral character. He shows that we can abolish and treat tension among the state and individuals by understanding the good and ways it can exemplify in the external world therefore the nature of morality must coincide with a just life. The principle set by Plato is that a healthy and an unhealthy soul can result based on one’s consumption of either justice or injustice. He compares a soul to sheep in regards to grazing. If sheep are placed in an area that thrives in poisoned grass, the grass consumption will sicken them overtime thus resulting in death of the sheep. Likewise, an individual placed in an environment of negativity is bound to sicken their soul and mind. Plato believes that having official laws and appropriate education plays a …show more content…
Murder, theft, cheating, dishonesty are examples of unjust acts that manipulate and give an unwarranted advantage over the other. According to Plato, hubris is to insult, push the other person in the subservient position and make them feel ashamed. The inner ego, desire to dominate, the pride and overstepping one’s boundaries result in defeat and downfall of the state. Thus, the doer obtains good whereas the sufferer is left in agony. The system of justice is so that powerful individuals not abuse the system or consolidate their powers over the weak. “Those who have not the power to seize the advantage and escape the harm decide that they would be better off if they made a compact neither to do wrong nor to suffer it” (Pg 44). This leads to the beginning of legislation, society of lawful and the just. Human beings by nature feel vulnerable and are likely to stomp over each other, tilt to scale to make things work out better over the expense of someone else. Thus, the justice system gets rid of the unjust individuals found guilty of breach. These unjust individuals of the state are either to be executed or exiled. We eliminate the unjust and make the inhabitants of the state follow certain rules and if one refuses to abide by them, they are then to be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Melians, the response of Athenians at Melos, and Pericles at his plague speech, all confirm the argument that the question of justice is at least relevant between those with unequal power. In Pericles’ case, the question of justice could influence the subjects of Athens to commit great violence against its oppressor. Justice, then, is real in that it influences action. It is absurd, then, to assert that an abstract principle like justice does not exist while at the same time admitting that it influences people; its influence is proof of its existence. Beyond this philosophical proof for the existence of justice, Athens’ own cries for justice further demonstrate the relevance and importance of questions of justice between those of unequal…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Chicago cop cleared in unarmed woman’s shooting death”. Headlines just like this are becoming common in today’s society and the main question that the community asks is “when will justice be served?” Living in a time where the black community keeps getting shot by the police and no consequences occur, we have no choice but to question, what is justice? Similar to the modern society, the one Plato lived in confronted this same question of justice. In this paper I will attempt to explain the view that Plato places before us through Socrates in The Republic as to what is justice and does it “pay” better than injustice in society.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cephalus’ justice poses more harm than good since the concept of “giving back what is owed” hold extreme and unforeseeable…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Plato believed that justice is good in itself, or “an intrinsic good”. He showed this by arguing in the Republic that justice is an essential part of living a happy life. In the Republic, Plato separates the soul into three parts he calls reason, spirit, and appetite. A moral or just person would be a person whose soul is functioning in equilibrium.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon's View Of Justice

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Glaucon challenges Socrates’ view of justice from the perspective of whether justice is unavoidable in society or it is “good in itself.” This paper presents an analysis of Glaucon and Socrates views of justice, as well…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While attempting to find the correct meaning of the word justice, Socrates refutes several of Thrasymachus's arguments pertaining to his personal perception of the definition. Furthermore, Socrates counters Thrasymachus's belief that one should be unjust, with the conviction that justice is a trait which one should possess. This particular area of the discussion shows a contrast between the ideas of Socrates and Thrasymachus regarding the term. One of Thrasymachus's arguments that Socrates takes issue with is that in which he states that unjust rulers and cities are the strongest, making justice something that the less powerful and the unwise should aspire to obtain.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his book, The Republic, Plato, a Greek philosopher, engages in conversation with his teacher Socrates. They come across the questions of “What is justice?” and “What is just?”. And throughout the first two books of the The Republic, many definitions of what justice is are thrown out by other philosophers, and Socrates always has an example to challenge each one. In the first book, three possible definitions are set out, and then in book two the argument of whether it is more profitable to be unjust or just is laid out.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice is the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs. Plato defines justice simply as truth. According to Plato, justice is the cornerstone of a perfect society. Since many people have their own personal ideas of justice, Plato suggests surrendering the idea of justice to the state. This will promote equality.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaborating the Definition of Justice Plato, the Republic is about the history of political thought, it includes long conversations and arguments among several intellects. Thrasymachus, a fierce fighter, argues that justice is what is good for the stronger and that the unjust man lives a more profitable life than the just man does. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, play the role in defending justice in all these arguments. He praises justices for itself and its consequences. Next, Glaucon and Adeimantus, sons of Ariston, restore Thrasymachus’s argument in a different prospect of perfectly unjust life is better than a perfectly just life.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato also gives his own idea of justice, which individually, is a human virtue that makes a person…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice: a set of values deemed "just" that are often used to establish law codes or serve as the basis for governments. And yet, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the concept of justice may often go unexamined. However, in Book I of Plato's Republic, Polemarchus is forced to not only articulate a concise definition of justice, but is also forced to come to its defense in response to an inquisitive Socrates. Through the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates, Plato forces the reader to question the traditional Greek perspective on justice and attempt to develop a new definition. Central to comprehending the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates lies in understanding Polemarchus' notion of justice.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato found moderation in the harmonious interaction between all classes and in the agreement that the highest class should rule and the rest should obey. This led Plato to the conclusion that by process of elimination, justice in the State is found in the harmonious unity of all classes created by the principle of specialization in which each class minds their own business. When each class attends to its own work, then the State is just. If any class attempts to do the work of another, there will be an injustice in the State. Justice can be seen using the metaphor of justice as a person’s soul.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato makes the argument that without justice, then it is virtually impossible for any individual to have a good life. This argument is reinforced in the book in three steps with the…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics