The Origin And Nature Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

Superior Essays
Plato’s The Republic, is a complex work that discusses the nature of man, justice, the soul and a just society. The city of Athens was on the verge of ruin after Socrates trial and execution. Plato considers justice to be interconnected with goodness of an individual and a state, thus being the best way for survival. This paper will discuss justice and injustice as exemplified in Plato’s description of the fall of the state and the individual. The conversation begins with Glaucon and Adeimantus reopening the belief that justice has its valid meaning and “demand a proof that justice is not merely useful as bringing external rewards, but intrinsically good as an inward state of the soul” (Pg 41). The points risen by both Glaucon and Adeimantus …show more content…
This makes one self-motivating, good and consistent in the society with themselves and others. Justice becomes the sole front of internal harmony and good in a society. The origin and nature of justice is an arrangement that one comes to and is only valuable as it keeps a certain kind of order, predictability and safety. Plato claims that anyone who embraces justice is better off in times of despair and misfortune. He asserts that it is more advantageous for one to be just than unjust because that affects the human soul. Plato states that the highest element of the human soul is “rational.” Plato praises that the nature of good guides one’s actions and their moral character. He shows that we can abolish and treat tension among the state and individuals by understanding the good and ways it can exemplify in the external world therefore the nature of morality must coincide with a just life. The principle set by Plato is that a healthy and an unhealthy soul can result based on one’s consumption of either justice or injustice. He compares a soul to sheep in regards to grazing. If sheep are placed in an area that thrives in poisoned grass, the grass consumption will sicken them overtime thus resulting in death of the sheep. Likewise, an individual placed in an environment of negativity is bound to sicken their soul and mind. Plato believes that having official laws and appropriate education plays a …show more content…
Murder, theft, cheating, dishonesty are examples of unjust acts that manipulate and give an unwarranted advantage over the other. According to Plato, hubris is to insult, push the other person in the subservient position and make them feel ashamed. The inner ego, desire to dominate, the pride and overstepping one’s boundaries result in defeat and downfall of the state. Thus, the doer obtains good whereas the sufferer is left in agony. The system of justice is so that powerful individuals not abuse the system or consolidate their powers over the weak. “Those who have not the power to seize the advantage and escape the harm decide that they would be better off if they made a compact neither to do wrong nor to suffer it” (Pg 44). This leads to the beginning of legislation, society of lawful and the just. Human beings by nature feel vulnerable and are likely to stomp over each other, tilt to scale to make things work out better over the expense of someone else. Thus, the justice system gets rid of the unjust individuals found guilty of breach. These unjust individuals of the state are either to be executed or exiled. We eliminate the unjust and make the inhabitants of the state follow certain rules and if one refuses to abide by them, they are then to be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Plato believed that justice is good in itself, or “an intrinsic good”. He showed this by arguing in the Republic that justice is an essential part of living a happy life. In the Republic, Plato separates the soul into three parts he calls reason, spirit, and appetite. A moral or just person would be a person whose soul is functioning in equilibrium.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon Vs Socrates

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In conclusion, this paper presented the nature of justice, Glaucon’s argument for injustice, Socrates arguments for justice and a subjective elaboration on justice. The nature of justice is the best and worst of justice. Glaucon conclusion that that unjust is better than just, because of the instant awards and perks. Socrates felt that justice would need to be found within the individual.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One's soul is made up of three parts: the rational, the spirited and the appetitive/passionate. Justice is formed when the rational rules, the spirit serves reason, and temptation and appetite exist in moderation, guided by reason. A man is therefore just to himself when he allows his rational part to make decisions and for his spirit to fight for and give courage to such decisions. Injustice, according to Socrates, is a kind of civil war between the three parts of the soul. Justice within a man forms just actions, whereas injustice produces unjust…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are three classes of citizens in the state: the craftspeople, the auxiliaries, and the rulers. According to Aristotle, justice in the state is these three classes doing what the are naturally inclined to do and not meddling in the others natural craft*(434d). The craftspeople build and create, the auxiliaries defend the city, and the rulers rule. Similarly, there are three parts in the soul: the rational part, which rules the whole of the soul; the spirited part, which dictates our passions and carries through what the rational part declares; and the appetitive part, which desires. Justice in the soul is each part of the soul doing what it is supposed to be doing.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    n Plato 's Republic, an analogy is struck between the state of the city and the state of the soul. While, in the latter case, a well balanced, or just, soul is one that is commanded by reason, and in which the spirited and appetitive parts of the soul play subordinate roles, a well balanced, or just, city is one in which the rulers are commanded by reason, the soldiers by spirit, and the laymen by appetites. The difficulty implicit in this state of affairs is that it does not appear, on reflection, that the so-called just city is truly just, since it would make better sense to say that a just city is one in which everyone has a just soul, rather than to anatomize the city in precisely the manner that the soul is, and on that basis call the…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaborating the Definition of Justice Plato, the Republic is about the history of political thought, it includes long conversations and arguments among several intellects. Thrasymachus, a fierce fighter, argues that justice is what is good for the stronger and that the unjust man lives a more profitable life than the just man does. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, play the role in defending justice in all these arguments. He praises justices for itself and its consequences. Next, Glaucon and Adeimantus, sons of Ariston, restore Thrasymachus’s argument in a different prospect of perfectly unjust life is better than a perfectly just life.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Vs Judeo

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His works resonate with critiques of democracy and the pursuit of justice. His thoughts and teachings are deeply embedded with a singular question of what does it mean to be good? Often using his mentor and teacher, Socrates as the main character and focal point of his dialogues, Plato’s writings burn with the desire of a man trying to reconcile ‘right and…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato also gives his own idea of justice, which individually, is a human virtue that makes a person…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Polemarchus replies that justice is useful in war and peacetime only when it protects objects or money, otherwise a skillful man is preferred. Thus, Socrates concludes that if justice is a craft, it is “only useful for useless things,” such as watching money or a lyre. Furthermore, Polemarchus’ first premise, is critiqued by Plato on the grounds that (1) if justice is a craft, a more skilled individual is more equipped to “give what is owed” than a just one, and (2) that Polemarchus’ argument reduces justice to…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Republic, Plato discusses and relates the three topics that are central to one lives, education, justice, and happiness. Through his definitions of these three topics, he considers how a society can achieve the proper education, justice, and happiness leading to his understanding of human nature. Plato addresses the close relation between being just and happy to the education received in society. The relationship between education, justice, and happiness depends on Plato’s understanding of these topics. Specifically with the relations of justice and happiness, the relationship is just as much dependent on the true sense of the idea as it is with Socrates rejection of the false claims.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice has been an evolutionary concept that has been forever evolving for thousands of years. However, in order for the modern deduction of justice to have been made by modern standards, the concept of justice itself needs to be established. Although its formal understanding may have been unclear during their time period, Hesiod and Homer both attempt to understand and exert their opinions as to what justice is through their epic poems and other works. Even though some of their views on justice conflict and others compliment each other, they both laid a foundation to explain what justice meant in Greek society.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Plato and Augustine believed justice to be a prominent virtue. In Plato’s time, the majority argued that it was reputation that mattered and not the actual act of justice, and that justice itself was burdensome. To Plato, justice was practiced not as a burden, but practiced so “that anyone who is going to be blessed with happiness must love both because of itself and because of its consequences” (Plato, Republic, 358a). Augustine’s view of justice was similar; however, his take on injustice differed. While Plato did not see injustice as extremely problematic, Augustine disagreed, stating, “It is better to suffer than to commit injustice” (Augustine, On Christian Doctrine, 85).…

    • 1091 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics