Rousseau On Inequality

Improved Essays
The organization and structure of a society have sometimes been key historical reasons for change in many different countries, empires or regimes. If a society was organized in a way that favored a particular race, religion, or political group then the seeds for revolution have already been sown. But given the works of Rousseau, Marx and Colbert it seems that society has been organized in a completely imbalanced manner. Using Discourses on Inequality, Communist Manifesto, and Colbert’s segments on campaign finance, it can be argued that society is structurally unequal and designed to favor the rich. When Rousseau spoke about the nature of inequality among man, he spoke about how changes in the equality of society were not immediate but gradual. When mankind was in its infancy, society was divided into men who “were hunters and warriors” (Rousseau 138) and women who led a more “sedentary” (Rousseau 145) life. However, according to Rousseau the turning …show more content…
So at the very beginning the foundation of inequality in society was formed on basis on who had more land and therefore money. But no man

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was an English Philosopher whose work was influential especially in the eighteenth century. Some of his main works include the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, and the Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Both of these works were written in response to prompts from the Academy of Dijon. For the first discourse, the prompt was, “Has the restoration of the sciences and arts tended to purify morals?” and for the second discourse the prompt was, "What is the origin of inequality among men, and is it authorized by the natural law?"…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the seventeen hundred, there were different thoughts on what women are expected to do. Such issues are made on the questions of why women were created and what their duties are in society. However, in the twentieth century, there are no longer as any women issues as there was back then. One of the big issues back then was that woman were not to be treated equally to men. This was specifically talked about by two enlightenment thinkers named Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Mary Wollstonecraft.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of the state of nature has been explored by many scholars (John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Rawls), which can help us better understand how gender fits into the different concepts of the state of nature. Mankind was brought into this world in a state of nature (pre-social condition) and had to give up liberties for self-preservation under a ruled society for the sole survival of man, or to better themselves. When describing the beginning of civilization, it’s vital to understand the different interpretations of how mankind created social contracts to avoid the state of nature. Two definitions of the state of nature that are important to understand is that of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s. But more importantly, within the state of nature lies each author’s definition of gender and how it shows the structural similarity and differences between the two.…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Women were incapable of being reliant on themselves and instead needed a husband for that support. Rousseau would not say that a woman is lower than man, but instead is better at domestic activities instead of in a public and political sphere. To him, a woman’s responsibility was to shape a man to be moral and…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It’s Not You, It’s Me!” Despite there seems to be a tradition of oppression towards women found in most- if not all- societies. The oppression of women can be traced back into early civilizations, but why? The patriarchal society that is rooted in most countries is a form of inequality, favoring men over women.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wealth inequality in today's society also known as the wealth gap, is growing. The top one percent makes twenty-five times more than the average family (Close 2016). This glaring inequality frequently brings up the question of what ought to be done with the distribution of wealth and resources. American Political Philosopher, John Rawls’, bases his argument on the premise that there should be an equal distribution of wealth in society. Robert Nozick, one of Rawls' main critics, demonstrates how distributive justice and an equal distribution of wealth conflicts with a person's individual liberty.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Every country around the world has economic inequality within it. The income inequality encountered in the United States in ranked sixty four in the world. The economic inequality divided in the United States has a major impact on three factors: social class, education and power amongst the citizens. The economic inequality seen in “Parable of the Sower” by Octavia Butler reflects on how separation between poor, middle and rich class lead to a dystopian future. “Inequality for all” examines how economic inequality can impact social classes such as upper, middle and lower class.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The essay will conclude that society is both progressive in one sense and yet corrupting in another sense depending upon the extent to which it fosters the positive values of community, and the extent to which it may degenerate if these values are not developed properly. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM, ANOMIE AND ALTRUISM. ABSOLUTE FREEDOM Rousseau’s Social Contract (1762) presents a view of society as corrupting, by describing the ways in which the transition from living freely, to living enslaved by the rules of society decays the virtue of man. Before there was civilisation, people lived peaceful and innocent lives, in which they strove to sustain their own contentment and absolute freedom. In the ‘state of nature’, man was free to do as he wished,…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Income and Wealth Inequality of America As a capitalist nation, the United State of America is facing a serious problem, which is the inequality of wealth and income. In pace with the growth of the economy, the rich people are getting richer and the poor people are getting poorer. The gap between the rich and poor is widening unprecedentedly fast. Why is that happening?…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although complicated tasks were divided among workers, the workers become more dependent on one another. The division of labor among individuals allowed them to transform land into property, however an unequal distribution of resources emerged as not all individuals held the same talents and abilities as one another. Therefore, the use of resources were unequal since some individuals could benefit by being naturally gifted at their craft while others could find it difficult to survive in a nonsufficient market depending the needs of that community. The institution of property, according to Rousseau, is what adds to the political and social inequalities. It is important to note that Rousseau does not necessarily believe that property is the cause of these inequalities rather he points to the inequality of property as the main driven force behind…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx examine the social change that nations go through either as a result of democracy diminishing Aristocratic ages or because of the wide spread of industrial capitalism. However, Marx and Tocqueville observe the impact of these social changes on the community differently. Marx writings are about how the European world was changing during his lifespan. He observes how the beginning of the Industrial Revolution creates an increase in the level of economic production, but also an immense increase of inequality in a society. On the contrary, Tocqueville analyzes the relationship between equality and liberty during the democratic ages vs. the aristocratic ages.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that humans are born innocent but are later corrupted by society. “Although, in this state, he deprives himself of some advantages which he got from nature, he gains in return others so great” (Rousseau). Rousseau believes that men are born equal but through the influence of society men “deprives himself of some advantages” that they are born with. Rousseau uses the words such as “advantages” to inform the reader about the features that mankind is born with but society removes it. The tone Rousseau uses is pro mankind but only to an extent.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx share the political and economical ideology that private property separates society into classes, and creates oppression. However, the two view property in different regards. Rousseau views property in a more political view, while Marx focuses more on the economic sphere of property and society. This paper will first state Rousseau and his critique of property, inequality, and the emergence of society found in The Discourses. Then, it will contrast the political critique of Rousseau with that of Karl Marx’s economic critique regarding property, and include other critical parts of Marx’s work including the Jewish Question and the Communist Manifesto.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau criticizes the state of nature described by Hobbes; instead of a constant state of fear, Rousseau described it as equality and happiness. Through the passage of time, the state of nature started to disappear as small communities formed, here man started to make comparisons to one another as class divisions developed. For Rousseau private property was a drastic change because communities went away from a simple state to one that consisted of greed and rivalry. Disapproving of Hobbes, who argued that people surrendered rights to an overall “ruler”, Rousseau believed people surrendered their rights to each other, in other words the community. For Rousseau, modern civilization took away the good parts of the early societies and replaced it with a society revolved around the state.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays