Analysis Of The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas

Decent Essays
Ursula Le Guin’s short story, The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, doubles as a challenging thought experiment. It is also a great story to compare moral theories to and what they would do in the situation of the story. In this story, Guin describes the utopian city of Omelas and defines all of the wonderful features that are obtained. The author states that “Omelas sounds in my words like a city in a fairy tale” (Guin 2). Everyone in this city is happy and content beyond belief. Guin also states that “happiness is based on a just discrimination of what is necessary, what is neither necessary nor destructive, and what is destructive” (Guin 2). However, this happiness would not be possible without the sacrifice of one innocent child; this child …show more content…
I would never be fully happy when I knew someone else is suffering for my happiness. As soon as I saw the innocent child sitting in its own excrement on the stool, I would immediately have to do something about it. I would stop and think about the citizens that are living their fantasy; however, this child is innocent and does not deserve the cruel treatment. My feelings toward the torture of the child obviously is negative; therefore, like Kant, I believe the moral thing to do is to help the helpless …show more content…
In our country, young men and women put their lives on the live for the safety and freedoms of our country. These soldiers protect our country and basic rights for our countries happiness. The brave men and women stand behind guns and get shot at for the happiness of millions. They are true heroes to our country. These stories are different in many ways; however, they both include someone risking everything, or being tortured all for the hope and happiness of their community. The short story, The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, by Ursula Le Guin is used as an illustrative thought experiment. This difficult mind twisting story shows readers whether they fall more in the lines with Kant or Bentham. Utilitarianism and Kantian ethics are completely opposite of each other. Utilitarianism believes in consequences while Kantian ethics believes in duty and relativism. With this thought experiment, I fall more on the side of Immanuel Kant because I would not be able to watch an innocent child suffer for my happiness. This situation is either one for all, or all for

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The idea of a perfect world is very complex and often confusing to understand; it becomes simpler to imagine such world if suffering existed within it. However, if a perfect world contains suffering, it then becomes flawed. In Ursula Le Guin’s The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas, the narrator struggles with the problem of creating a realistic ‘perfect world’, and as a solution she has created two contradictory worlds in which the existence of one is dependant on the other. the narrator provides many versions of Omelas when she changes details about the city, however, these types of worlds seem to fall into two opposing worlds based on the concept of good versus evil.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malala Yousafzai Dbq

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Oklahoma postman rescued a young girl from a burning house, a paramedic bride helped people in a car crash, despite the fact that her wedding was still going on, and a marine who lost both feet in Afghanistan saved a baby from a car crash. They all had a choice to walk away and not care at all, yet they decided to take a risk and save a life. These courageous heroes didn’t even think twice about the possible harmful consequences of their actions. The actions of true heroes today are deemed as selfless only if they put their lives in danger to save someone, perform beneficial deeds without expecting anything in return, or take bold actions despite fears. Heroes that endanger their own life for the benefit of others are truly selfless.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They leave Omelas…and they do not come back. The place they go towards is a place even less imaginable to most of us than the city of happiness” (Le Guin 7). Although they refuse to remain silent and ignorant, they must spend the rest of their lives somewhere unknown and hold a sense of personal responsibility of wishing to change a situation they cannot. Now, they embrace guilt and personal torment as part of their consciousness in their new…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    art IIII: Immanuel Kant Immanuel Kant published A Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) five years after Bentham’s Principles of Morals and Legislations, launching a scathing critique of utilitarianism. Kant proposed that a moral action does not suggest treating individuals as a means to an end. What Kant means by this is that we treat individuals for the sake of something else (means), such as Dudley and Stephens treating Parker as a means to maximise happiness. Instead, a moral action is one that treats individuals as ends in themselves, one that does not account for external influences such as happiness. Individuals are worthy of dignity and respect not because we own our bodies and minds but because we are rational beings, capable of reason and conscious thought.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Honoring Our Veteran’s Our nation’s Veterans don’t get enough credit for what they have done. We don't realize the things they have done for our country, and the mental strengths they have. Our soldiers often get overlooked and in my opinion, deserve the most respect.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom is a wonderful and sacred part of our everyday American lives. Here we have the right to state our own opinions and believe in what we feel is right. We can choose how we want to live our lives and speak our opinion freely. In America we can go after our dreams and have hope without any fear of punishment. Freedom is what our righteous country was built on.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In many different situations, an action must be decided on. Mill and Kant each present two major theories as to how this decision is reached and how it can be judged as morally right or wrong. In the given predicament of Rescue I and Rescue II, each philosopher would argue for a different ethical approach based on the fundamental principles of their individual theories components of their theories. John Stuart Mills is famous for his views on utilitarianism. His view is revised from his teacher Jeremy Bentham’s theory of crude utilitarianism which introduces the Greatest Happiness Principle().…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every human thinks different but we can have alioth thoughts it is human nature to think as a group. As a group we come to a consensus faster. The short story “The Ones Who walks Away from Omelas” shows the destruction of one a child for the happiness of the community as a whole. The author interprets the child as the scapegoat of the society which adds religious and self conflict that confines within the human Krupa 3 mind; the society has two choices: continue to sin continue to stay happy and put the sins on the child or leave the town of Omelas walk away from che child.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” she depicts a pseudo-utopian society where there is prosperity for all, but one person. This person’s misery is the foundation for the rest of the city’s peace and development. Everything has a price. Whether it be the clothes we wear, the food we eat, or the water we drink. There cannot be happiness without suffering.…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Response to “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas The whimsical city of Omelas is a beautifully portrayed utopia, or model of a perfect society. Everyone who is anyone would love to live in this place of joy and happiness. This futuristic society has no ruler and no laws but everything seems to work in perfect harmony.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” author Ursula K. Le Guin has the narrator asking the reader many rhetorical questions that forces the reader to investigate their own thoughts, morals, or beliefs. This is often the case with short stories, which present questions in the form of a parable that shares a moral lesson with the reader. “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” presents this challenge for us to find what is our happiness and what we will do to achieve this happiness, including ignoring issues of despair. Imagine living in bliss.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    “I think a hero is a person really intent on making this a better place for all people.” –Maya Angelou. A hero is someone who does what’s right, no for the reward, but for the benefit of the positive outcome. Heroes are needed in many situations. A world full of villains and no heroes would be out of control.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics