From the moment of birth to the time of death, humans are flooded with emotions both good and bad. Individuals are continuously seeking fulfillment of happiness and perfection, but nothing in this world is perfect, just as no single individual is perfect. One can’t attain perfection in an imperfect world. In "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas" by Ursula K. Le Guin uses the nonfigurative society of Omelas to highlight the unseemly and unpleasant state of the human condition. She tells a story of a city where everything and everyone seem to flourish, making it look like a perfect city. However, hidden deep down in the darkness somewhere beneath the city of Omelas is the city’s secret, a child is kept there, starving, tortured, forbidden of any
…show more content…
the narrator persuades us to think that helping this one child would lead to the suffering of an entire city. She uses many methods to prove her point. For instance, she tells us that if the child were to be saved, “in that day and hour all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed.” (Guin). She defends the people of Omelas, who are not heartless, cruel, but instead as passionate, gentle people capable of sympathy. The narrator makes it exceedingly easy to side with the Omelasians, providing rational clarification for their actions and even going so far as to try persuade he reader by saying the citizens are not free themselves. She tries to make one sympathize with the resolve of the people of Omelas “It is because of the child that they are so gentle with children.” (Guin). If Le Guin’s message was that using the greater good model was viable to the society. Then Permanent writer of the Daily outlook Afghanistan, Dilawar Sherzai, in “Ethics--The Concept of 'Right' and 'Wrong,” endorses that, “The important point, however, is to determine whether the social norms and values are humane and they keep in consideration the basic human rights”, adding to the fact that they are trying to resolve the problem by return to the values of the
the narrator persuades us to think that helping this one child would lead to the suffering of an entire city. She uses many methods to prove her point. For instance, she tells us that if the child were to be saved, “in that day and hour all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed.” (Guin). She defends the people of Omelas, who are not heartless, cruel, but instead as passionate, gentle people capable of sympathy. The narrator makes it exceedingly easy to side with the Omelasians, providing rational clarification for their actions and even going so far as to try persuade he reader by saying the citizens are not free themselves. She tries to make one sympathize with the resolve of the people of Omelas “It is because of the child that they are so gentle with children.” (Guin). If Le Guin’s message was that using the greater good model was viable to the society. Then Permanent writer of the Daily outlook Afghanistan, Dilawar Sherzai, in “Ethics--The Concept of 'Right' and 'Wrong,” endorses that, “The important point, however, is to determine whether the social norms and values are humane and they keep in consideration the basic human rights”, adding to the fact that they are trying to resolve the problem by return to the values of the