Analysis Of Plato's Obligations Of The Citizen

Superior Essays
Obligations of the citizen
Name
Institution

Citizenship as a duty has been a topic of discussion by many philosophers, social activist and legal experts. Understanding who is supposed to be defined as a citizen, and the roles that they have to the state requires detailed insight into the not only the laws but also the nature of human kind and the moral laws (Batstone, 2014). After all, mankind reacts differently when faced by varying situations. Plato, in his memos sought to portray directly or indirectly the roles of a citizens and his duties to the state. In his views of the situation that faced Socrates after being put on trial, Plato presented the difficulty situations a citizen can be into and how his resolve can be tested.
…show more content…
This papers draws comparison on the obligations of a citizen as presented by martin Luther in his letter from Birmingham cell to those who criticized his stand on segregations and the views presented by Socrates in his discussion with Crito over a …show more content…
In his teachings on citizenship, Socrates was adamant that the laws set, and recognized by the people as the sovereign laws should be respected by the leadership and the citizens as well (Plato, 2007). This stand is similar to that adopted by martin Luther in letter, where he emphasizes that laws are to be followed but both by those being governed and those governing. This brings the aspect of a just law being defiled by unjust actions. However, the approach to the injustice is the difference between Luther’s philosophy of citizenship and Socrates views. After being approached by Crito with an arrangement to smuggle him out of his cell, Socrates declined the offer terming it as an act that would be similar to what those who prosecuted him did by defiling the rule of law (Plato,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s, Five Dialogues, inklings of the Hobbesian notion of the social contract begin to assemble within the dialogue of Crito as the theory of tacit consent is explored. At the start of the dialogue, Crito proposes that Socrates should escape from Athenian prison with his assistance, however, Socrates is adamant against an attempted escape, arguing [from the polis’ perspective] that, “Whoever of you remains…has in fact come to an agreement with us [the polis] to obey our [the polis’] instructions’ (51e).” Two questions arise from Socrates’ argument: Does tacit consent exist? And if it does exist, does it foster obedience within a society? In response, this paper will argue that in respect to the Athenian polis, tacit consent exists in two forms: the first form being where the individual cannot consent to the societal agreement, and the second form being where the individual is old enough to understand the notion of their negative responsibility to the polis, and can therefore consent.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final reason Socrates presents against Crito’s offer of help is the Agreement Argument. The Agreement Argument follows that by participating in Athenian society, the citizens of Athens have implicitly agreed to obey the Laws. Socrates made an agreement to the State to follow the Laws, and it is just to keep to one's agreements, and so to escape would be to break an agreement and so Socrates ought not to escape with Crito (Plato, 1997b, §51c-52d). This agreement refers to is a form of political obligation which relies on the idea of tacit consent, which is formed solely by living as a citizen of Athens. Tacit consent is the idea that by living in Athens, the citizens have agreed to follow the Laws of Athens implicitly by benefiting from the organization, protection, and education of the State.…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These series of questions culminate into Socrates’ conception of virtue leading him to reject Crito’s pleas for him to escapes because if he does he will be disobeying the laws of the state. By disobeying the law of the state he would be committing an injustice and doing what is wrong therefore harming his soul. If he harmed his soul, then he would not be living the virtuous or examined life which he states in the Apology “is not worth living”; so even if he disagrees with the state he must still obey its laws since that is, in his perception of virtue, just and right. This dialogue gives more understanding as to why Socrates questions the views and actions of others and gives practice to Plato’s teachings from Euthyphro and…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the Laws exist as one element, to break one would be to break every one of them, and in doing as such, Socrates would bring about them incredible damage. The citizen is bound to the Laws like a child is bound to a guardian, thus to conflict with the Laws would resemble striking a guardian. As opposed to just infringing upon the Laws and departure, Socrates ought to attempt to induce the Laws to release him. These Laws introduce the national's obligation to them as a sort of social contract. By living in Athens, a resident is bound by supporting the Laws, and complying with them.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trying to break someone out of jail is not the most legal way of doing it, but Crito just wanted to save his friend. As a citizen, Crito should have done nothing because the most legit way would be letting the court decide if Socrates is innocent or guilty. Martin Luther King and Crito have the same views of doing what is right even if it involved breaking some rules; King wanted to bring awareness to the whole country about racial segregation against African Americans by breaking laws that were unjust and for Crito he wanted to save his best friend from being executed by breaking him…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is also faced with a decision to follow the unjust law in escaping jail or the just law in remaining and facing death. Conflicted, Socrates explores the meaning of just and unjust laws. King explores similar terrains in asking the question, "How can you advocate breaking the laws and obeying others? " In the end, Socrates convinces Crito that it would be best to remain in jail and not attempt an escape.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates refuses Crito’s invitation to escape because by doing so he breaks the laws of Athens. Socrates explains to Crito that by exiling himself he not only breaks one law, he breaks them all; this is due to the fact that as a citizen you support the laws, and breaking one law would end your endorsement. These laws carry great importance to Socrates, because by escaping he breaks the law from which he was fostered, educated, and begat his children. By exiling himself, Socrates cannot enter other states; considering he broke the laws of Athens, other states would see him as a fugitive. Furthermore, Socrates he explains that he would not greedily risk his children’s Athenian citizenship in order to save his life; he also states that even the…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the text, Crito, a man by the name of Socrates is put in jail for a crime he did not commit. He is urged by another, named Crito, to escape from jail as it is unfair for him to be locked away for something he did not do. Although, Socrates firmly believes he should stay and face the time rather than escape. It is unjust for him to escape because he will spend his life running with no place to go and settle down, he will destroy the laws, and he should not do wrong just because wrong was done to him. It is unjust for Socrates to escape from jail because he will be running from the law without having anywhere to go.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following essay will discuss Socrates reasons for refusing Crito’s offer of help in Crito, as well as whether or not these refusals are justified. We will discuss each of Socrates reasons for refusing in turn, criticising each as we move through the dialogue. Crito raises the problem of the extent to which a moral person is obligated to their City State (referred to as Athens and the State throughout), as well as the individual's dedication to the central principle of the dialogue; never doing any wrong. We will focus on the idea that by being wronged by the State, Socrates’ obligation is dissolved but his reasons remain justified due to his dedication to the avoidance of wrongdoing and Plato's need to have Socrates be a consistent character and this being the sole justification for his refusal. Socrates gives four reasons as to why he refuses Crito’s offer of escape.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice can have many meanings when put into different perspectives. Throughout Crito, by Plato, Socrates has to determine whether to escape prison or stay. Socrates was initially charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in gods. He argued his case in jury and did not choose the alternate punishment, exile, which could have saved his life. He was then given a death sentence and he was imprisoned until his execution.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout their conversation, Crito discusses with Socrates why he believes Socrates should flee. However, this leads Socrates to question the power of state and the laws. The Laws that make up the state is a crucial factor in “Crito”. In fact, the Laws are so important in Socrates 's discussion that they become a voice, almost like another person. He thinks thoroughly and examines them because he believes that every citizen has an agreement with Laws.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Books II-IV of Plato’s Republic, Socrates creates an ideal polis, and in doing so finds justice in the soul. The two foundational principles of the ideal city that Socrates creates are self-sufficiency and one-person-one-art, referred to today as specialization. Individual people are not self-sufficient, so the citizens of the city must take up a profession and trade with each other. Socrates and his companions are successful in their search for justice, and are able to reach the answer by considering the classes and their education in an ideal state. Citizens of the ideal city are not able to rely exclusively on themselves, nor are they able to practice a multitude of crafts.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Crito, a dialogue written by Plato, the Greek philosopher Socrates is sentenced to death because of corrupting the youth, creating new gods, and being an atheist. Centuries later, another prominent figure, Martin Luther King, Jr., is jailed for civil disobedience in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963. When questioned of their imprisonment, Plato and King, Jr. are both determined to maintain justice despite the injustices charged against them, but for Plato, justice means upholding the law at all costs since one should do no wrong, whereas King is concerned with reforming the law, therefore doing wrong could make a “right”. To both King and Socrates, a portion of injustice in law damages justice as a whole.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics