Obergefell V. Hodges Case Study

Improved Essays
The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016. The case was appealed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. There were a lot of same sex couples that had sued their state agencies in their home states to challenge the states bans on same sex marriage or to have same sex marriage available the way hetero marriage is available. The plaintiffs argued that the “states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process …show more content…
We do not have anything to say about any other person’s marriage so why do we have a say on same sex marriage. Opposite sex couples have divorces left and right and it does not always seem stable. For all we know, same sex couples have things figured out. We should let them be married and even get divorced if they want too because that is their right. The churches have no say in what the government does and churches are the ones that always have a problem with the LGBT community. If the law protects ALL marriages, then the churches should not have a problem because I have not seen a same sex couple fighting to be married in a church. All they want is to be legally …show more content…
LGBT community can sit anywhere on the bus and they can usually go anywhere they want to eat, and they all go the same school with all the hetero people. African Americans had to sit in the back of the bus and most of them had to stand and there was a lot of people that had to walk. They could not eat at any restaurants that served whites and they had to go to different schools. African Americans were treated as property and the whites could not see them any other way. I feel like they are the same because they could not marry who they loved. African Americans could not marry whites because that was frowned upon and no one liked it and they went to jail for it. The LGBT community could not marry who they wanted to because it was also frowned upon but they did not go to jail. They had to fight to marry who they wanted. They could not just marry who they wanted like the whites and the opposite sex couples. They had to fight for those

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Yet in the time between 1971 and 2015, the Supreme Court had made a series of decisions that…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Loving v. Virginia changed what the concept of marriage was. Marriage was first between a man and a woman of the same race. That is what marriage stood for in the early years, no interchanging races. However with this case, interracial marriage became legal. What was once forbidden and different became normal.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The three most significant cases the supreme court has heard are Brown vs. Board of Education, Gideon vs. Wainwrights, and Obergefell vs. Hodges. All of these cases revolve around equality, which is why I think they are the most important. The first case I have chosen to talk about, is the most important one to me, which is Obergefell vs. Hodges. This case had a 5-4 ruling, which shows how debatable this problem is.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case was not just about the right to marry, it was also about the benefits of being married. Even after same sex marriage was legalized in some states, not all states would recognize the marriages and the benefits that are granted to a marriage couple. Those benefits include insurance, deductions on tax refunds, access to a spouse in a medical situation and many more. They individuals in the case did not just want their marriage to be legal, but to be recognized be all states as…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lawrence Vs Texas Essay

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the Lawrence versus Texas case, and what effect has it had on the society? This is a set of questions that numerous people have asked over the years. Are you one of them? Today I will explain what the Lawrence versus Texas case was, my perceptions on the case, what it did for society as a whole, the historical basis for the court’s ruling in this case, and last but not least I will explain the civil liberties groups that were involved and their impact on the case. Let’s start with the case itself.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1967, (while many states tried to outlaw interracial marriage), the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case stated that these laws (outlawing interracial marriage) were unconstitutional. An interracial couple was ordained in a state that allowed interracial marriage, but when they moved to Virginia (a state that did not allow interracial marriage), the couple was charged with disobeying Virginia Law. Finally, the courts declared the bans unconstitutional and stated that marriage was a basic civil right of man, and it was essential to our…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Katz (par. 3), the Supreme Tribunal joined the case together with the others and agreed to review them. The briefing was set to come to a close in April this year. The other lawsuits involved the Tennessee, Kentucky, and Michigan. The court advised the parties in the cases to present their arguments, according to the questions concerning the Amendment. The Obergefell’s lawsuit was mainly directed towards the violation of the Fourteenth Act.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the DOMA, where the Supreme Court had ruled that under the Section 3 of the DOMA, was deemed unconstitutional and that the federal government to ensure that same sex couples are able to receive federal benefits for the…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Recently the country has made a big step towards equality, states can no longer keep homosexuals from getting married. Even though gay marriage has been legalized in all states many religions still opposes it finding it…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is argument all across America over whether gay and lesbians should have the right to marry. There is argument about whether legally same-sex couples have the right to marry. In the article “In Defense of Traditional Marriage” Ryan Anderson made arguments against same-sex marriages. He argues whether the government has a right to create a new civil right and then redefine marriage as well.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All Americans should have the same rights, including the right to marry the person of their choice. If men and women are equal under the law, why does it matter how they choose to pair off? Everyone’s rights should be just as important, instead of picking and choosing which ones are more important. Different things are important to different people, and everyone wants to be happy.…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Texas Equality

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The struggle for equality and citizen’s equal rights has been an issue and continues to be one to this day. Texas has waged many battles in the struggle for women, African Texans, Latinos, Gays, and Lesbians to all achieve the social and political equality that they all deserve. The major developments that have occurred in order for their equality are extremely significant and hold an important role in today’s society. Luckily, even after the opposition that has happened, we all came together as one and progressed forward creating equality for everyone. Women in the Republic of Texas have struggled for years in the battle of equality, until the Women’s Suffrage Movement began, which was led by Minnie Fischer Cunningham.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because certain religions do not like it when gays get married because it's not what god wants. Separation of church and state is basically so the government does not make rules and laws because of religion it has to be an actual issue. Pollitt also thinks that it is ridiculous how a man and a women can get married but gays can’t. She tells and explains this by “married men are much less likely than singles to kill people, crash the car, take drugs, commit suicide - although it overlooks such husbandly failings as domestic violence, child abuse, infidelity and abandonment. If a man rapes his wife instead of his date, it probably won’t show up on a police blotter….”…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The separation of Church and state means that the ideas of religion will not be intertwined with the ideas of the government. This idea goes all the way back to Thomas Jefferson in a letter he wrote in 1802 to a Baptist church. In Jefferson’s time the purpose was to keep the state out of the church’s business; however, in our society today it refers to keeping the church out of the state’s business. Therefore, in theory, the church should stay out of what the state decides to do just as we were given the right to freedom of religion. Just because someone is married to the same sex, does nto mean that they are not religious.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are laws that a for the LGBT community and there are laws against the LGBT community. When one law is made there is always a new one to repel the old ones. Some laws such as the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 lets the government treat same sex couples like they are not even married. Other laws make same sex couples pay heavy taxes and same sex couples are not allowed to have marriage benefits like opposite sex couples. An example of these taxes is about “Windsor [who] got bitter news later in the form of federal and New York estate tax bills totaling $600,000 that would not have been levied on an opposite-sex couple” (Jost).…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays