The Obergefell Case Summary

According to Katz (par. 3), the Supreme Tribunal joined the case together with the others and agreed to review them. The briefing was set to come to a close in April this year. The other lawsuits involved the Tennessee, Kentucky, and Michigan. The court advised the parties in the cases to present their arguments, according to the questions concerning the Amendment. The Obergefell’s lawsuit was mainly directed towards the violation of the Fourteenth Act. The oral arguments in the case were presented on April 28th. The couple’s lawyers were Mary Bonauto, U.S Solicitor Don Verrilli, and an attorney Hallward-Driemeier. The state defendants were Joseph Whalen and the ex-Solicitor General Bursch. During the process, the questions raised by the judges indicated a split along their ideological lines. Their final verdict is …show more content…
Dahl shows clearly that the ruling regime is the primary contributor to the decision-making process. He advocates for an institutional method to prevent the interference of the counter majoritarian perspective. The Supreme Court must express sincere preferences when making a verdict in this case because it has the power to bring chaos in the country. However, it is clear from the studies and images provided in this paper that the judges in the Supreme Tribunal use the ruling regime theory. They adjust their outcomes based on the responses of the government. In the Obergefell case, the court should exercise the constitutional laws of a democratic system while avoiding the whims of the majority. The court must play the essential role of a protector of the constitutional rights. The efforts will probably result in a difference in opinions from the law enforcers in the case, but it is the only way to practice democracy. (Katz, par. 4). The table below shows the levels of overrides following the political influence on