Benefits Of The National Security Agency

Superior Essays
It is widely debated, as a resident of the United States of America, whether or not it is socially beneficial or even acceptable in any way for the federal government as the National Security Agency otherwise known as the NSA to delve into information that is personal to you for the protection and well-being of the country.(NSA, 2015) Charlie Savage, an author and Washington correspondent for the New York Times, highlight the fact that the NSA is capable of reading SMS (Short Message Service) information between two people, record telephone conversations and even overseeing exchanges through IMs (Instant Messages) when you could be sharing credit or debit card information and passwords, it makes the majority of the United States’ populace wonder …show more content…
Many people feel that the government is too involved in their lives, while of course some others (depending on political stances) enjoy this aspect. However, in consideration of the NSA, most credence was lost when it was said by Edward J. Snowden, a computer professional that worked for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), that the United States federal government under the National Security Agency and United Kingdom’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) were gathering intelligence for national and international terroristic defense by observing private information between individuals who happened to be legal citizens of either country, which debatably violates the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution (O’Neill, 2014) and the Human Rights Act of 1998 in the United Kingdom, therefore infringing upon other lawful contracts in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (FindLaw UK, 2015). This makes the public wonder whether or not the country is using this information to gain knowledge about unlawful actions against the state, or simply collecting information to invade one’s …show more content…
Dustin Volz, a writer for the National Journal writes how many governmental authorities (generally Republican figures) state otherwise, explaining that it is necessary in the network to prevent terrorist activities, and these figures also attempt to pass bills to counteract reform issued by the US president (Volz, 2015). Jack A. Smith, writer for the Foreign Policy Journal and former editor of The Guardian explains how United States President Barack Obama has stated that the NSA is an essential piece to the web of national security, but that it and other surveillance programs should however be restarted and overhauled by his legislation so as to not delve into the lives of United States citizens so directly and fiercely. Shortly after stating this, his proposal was met by Congress and thereafter, quickly passed with intense backlash from Republican senators and representatives (Smith,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Edward snowden is a computer professional that is famously known for leaking information on the U.S. National Security Agency in 2013. Snowden said in an interview that “ The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything that is uses telecommunications.”(www.cfr.org). This infrastructure collects data all around the United States. This is private information that is being collected without our consent or a warrant being present. The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org).…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New technologies are putting more pressure on the boundaries of privacy. New ways are emerging that aid in tracking private information on individuals. No matter what new technology emerges, individual privacy rights should be respected at all levels. Americans are concerned of how to maintain an equilibrium between their personal privacy rights and the need for government to track potential terrorist threats since Edward Snowden leaked National Security Agency's (NSA) documents which included collections of information regarding data from cellphone and internet of millions of Americans. Freedom, privacy and safety are the rights of Americans and should not be compromised to confirm safety from terrorism.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a finite line between national security and the privacy of innocent Americans in their day to day lives. The right to have privacy was provided to people when it was installed in the 4th amendment to the constitution. Although the U.S. Government has been stretching out this basic right and invading the privacy right that every American has. The government should not be allowed to freely use surveillance programs to watch over innocent people 's every move. Stated in the 4th amendment there is the right for people “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many citizens of the United States who do not agree or like the NSA’s involvement in communication networks. For example, “This country was founded on the notion of liberty. So it is striking to us that we have reached a point in our history when the expectation of privacy and liberty is dissolving” (Paul and Yoho). A major argument against the NSA is that it violates the rights of the countries people. Paul and Yoho say “We need to go back to the basics and use the Fourth Amendment as our guide.”…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On June 6th, 2013 The Guardian and the Washington Post revealed the fact that the NSA had access to customer information on Apple, Microsoft, and Google computer products. The information obtained by the NSA was allegedly used to prevent any terrorist actions. However, the NSA has “[built] up a store of information on millions of US citizens, regardless of whether or not they are ‘persons of interest’ to the agency” (Brown). Although terrorist plots are a legitimate threat to America, the U.S government has overstepped its boundaries by violating the citizen’s of America’s fourth amendment right to privacy.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Americans have been questioning whether government surveillance has passed the limits of the right of privacy. The controversy is set whether the violation of the right of privacy is in exchange for security. In other words, is the government really providing security or control the citizens? Is it really to benefit the people or the government? With that questions, more questions are made like: Is the government correct on doing what is being done?…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the government is invading our privacy it’s like having them watching our every move and constantly looking through our photo’s, Facebook messages, and text messages. For example when the FBI wanted Apple to unlock a terrorist phone so that they could look at the text messages. Apple informed the FBI that if they unlock that phone then they would be forced to unlock all of the phones. If they did this then hackers or the government could get a hold of something they don't need to know about. The government need to stop invading our privacy because if something gets leaked it could cost the government a lot of money or ruin someone’s life.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The United States of America the National Security Agency has been working for ages to assure that the country is safe, but recently it has become a rising concern that they have overstepped their boundaries of American citizen’s privacy by operating surveillance technology all around the country and storing data form every phone call of citizens. With the American Citizens’ privacy at stake, each branch of government took its stand against the matter. The Judicial Branch has to come up with a legal compromise; the Legislative Branch and Congress are working to make surveillance laws that would better please its citizens, and the Executive Branch and the president have agreed to come up with an alternative to Section 215 of The Patriot Act. The Supreme Court has to establish a legal compromise to the surveillance of the American citizens considering it was said that what the National Security Agency/Central Security was doing went against Section 215 of the Patriot Act.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of the scandals that have shown that executive powers in the fight against terrorism can be abused include secret prisons abroad, communication interception and detainee abuse. Public mistrust that the fight against terrorism may be costing their civil liberties is justifiable when the government eavesdrops on their private conversations. The fourth amendment of the constitution clearly stipulates explicitly that persons have the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects, and their rights against unreasonable searches and seizures must not be violated. Any official surveillance of international calls or emails of Americans within the U.S required an approval from FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court), but there have been reports of government eavesdropping despite the presence of legal…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    *The NSA shouldn’t be spying on citizens because it is a violation of the U.S citizens rights, causes a psychological affect, and they have an inefficient system that wrongfully accuses people *. The NSA and telecommunication companies are betraying people’s trust by violating their privacy. One major telecommunication company…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Imagine that you found out, after years of oblivion, that your phone calls, every day, were being monitored by a government organization. You would probably feel as though you had been invaded, you would feel like your privacy had been taken away, and you would wonder what you had done wrong. What laws had you broken to be investigated in such an invasional way? You would not think you had anything to hide, but you would still feel uncomfortable. But then imagine that you find out that you did nothing wrong, and you were not the only one being invaded.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a poll of American citizens, 62% said that it was more important for the government to investigate possible terror threats, and some think it should go even farther than that (“6 Reasons…”). 45% of Americans think the government should go farther and monitor all activity if it will prevent another terrorist attack (“Here is the Pro…”). Many citizens believe that in the event of a terrorist attack, the government should be able to search phone calls and texts. Also, if a citizen complains about a breach of privacy, does that mean they have something to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constant and extent surveillance state was necessary to build up a sense of trust from their citizens. Americans are still seeking for the right balance between national security and individual privacy. To what extent is ok to gather data for national security purposes? Can we assure that individual’s privacy is not violated?…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, the government should not be permitted to use surveillance on its citizens because it violates the constitution. According to a series of secret court orders issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, “the NSA effectively granted itself unrestricted access to every American’s complete phone and Internet records, all without any independent oversight.” This means that American citizens are being violated of their right to freedom of speech guaranteed by the constitution. This goes against what the United States stands for, and is unfair to citizens. Additionally, in the article Actually, Most Countries Are Increasingly Spying on Their Citizens, the UN Says by Olga Khazan “countless other Western nations engage in similar…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    national security and counterterrorism” while a majority of the standard population finds them invasive and in breach of rights (Bergen). These claims of essentialness are, however, hard to argue for due in part to how secretive everything still is as well as the low turnouts reported from the programs. Although surveillance programs by the NSA have the possibility of discovering and halting terrorist activity, because of the breach of privacy and low actual rate of discoveries due to them, the creation and enforcement of such programs should be suspended. The first question on the minds of most of the people who don’t know much about what’s going on with these programs (which could theoretically be everyone if information about them is being withheld) is usually “What is being monitored and/or collected, and why?” According to the documents leaked by Snowden as well as information revealed by the NSA and other groups afterwards, information being collected, tracked, recorded, or otherwise monitored includes, but is not limited to: metadata of phone calls made within the U.S. (metadata in this sense includes the calling and receiving numbers and the length of the call), Emails,…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays