Kantian And Utilitarianism Analysis

Good Essays
Kantian and utilitarianism are both ethical systems which originate from the normative side of ethics that focuses on how people should act. These theories facilitate in the process of reaching a conclusion on appropriate actions that would be considered as morally right or best. They guide knowledge to a conclusions when situations are complicated and require an attention to details that involve difficult decisions. As Kantian and utilitarianism sit at polar ends of the normative ethics spectrum, their differences in principals and outcomes provide alternative processes in developing strategies to reach the best possible resolution to difficult problems. When evaluating which theory, either Kantian or utilitarianism, would provide a better …show more content…
This theory’s position is that an action or decision is ethically correct if it results in the greatest good to the greatest number of people. However, utilitarianism does not include the intention or motive that influence action, only the utility, the usefulness of an action what produces the greatest happiness. Two nineteenth-century philosophers, Bentham and Mills are accredited with the formulation of utilitarianism. In our text, Bentham and Mills both expressed that happiness is better as well as the right actions produce the greatest balance between happiness over …show more content…
Kantian ethics requires the scientists to consider their intentions are from goodwill, the will to do the right thing morally. Furthermore, Kantian ethics obligates the scientist to ensure their will is consistent by formulating a maxim. This maxim places the scientists to a moral obligation to their subjects as well to themselves. Since Kantian ethics considers what is best for the individual, using Kantian as a foundation for ethical decision making would ensure that venerable test subjects would be protected from exploitation. For these reasons, Kantian would be the best foundation for ethical decision

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Mill used utilitarianism as a basis for ethics and he argued that we already do use utilitarianism as a moral standard. To Mill an action is right if it promotes happiness and it is wrong if it reverse happiness. Kant on the other hand bases his view of ethics on good will rather than the outcomes of happiness. As we read, utilitarianism focuses on outcomes of happiness, here we can concluded that it is based on ends, not on means or intentions. I do not totally agree with this however, a person could intend something bad and wrong but in the end, end up causing great happiness.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Ben’s circumstances, and circumstances of similar nature, if he were to act according to Kantian ethics, his approach would begin with carrying out the action that is aligned with a good-will and a moral duty to act. To Kantian ethics, human rationality and the development of the good-will are of central importance. Kant believed that since humans have the ability to reason, they must use their rationale to recognize the demands of reason, “for reason recognizes the establishment of a good will as its highest practical destination” (Marino 194). For Kant, it’s not the consequences of the actions that truly matter, but the motivation of doing them out of a good-will. The only genuinely good actions are the actions done exclusively out of respect for the moral rules.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He says, “The greatest happiness principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (Mill 52). Mill’s utilitarian ethical theory rely majorly on the self-interest rather performing an act as a duty. An ethical theory should have a reason justified for performing a specific act. The ability of an act to yield maximum happiness should not be used to determine whether the act is moral or immoral. It involves assessing what the people perceive to be moral and taking actions which will produce insignificant consequences on the people other than the individual performing the act.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When defining morality it is important to “recognize the existence of significant variation in what rules and ideals different people put forward as morality.” However, in philosophy, the ethical system which makes the best case for what morality is really about it would be Deontology rather than Consequentialism. This is because deontologists are concerned with doing the right thing because it is what is ultimately morally good which is more ethical than defining what is right by whether or not an act results in a positive consequence. “Ethics, also called moral philosophy, [is] the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.” The categorical imperative and other deontological teachings fit neatly into the definition of ethics since the top priority is to always do what is right before being concerned with anything else. Deontology defines what morality is really about because taking the most ethical approach is what a deontologist values most, the same cannot be said for a consequentialist, which makes deontology superior to consequentialism from a moral and ethical…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Kant being filled with happiness and having the characteristic on being good are two different things. “Happiness can even be reduced to less than nothing”, but an achievement happiness is always conditioned. “Kant claims that a good will is an ultimate, unconditional good. Unconditional good is a good no matter how it was a achieved in a right way or wrong way, when to a ultimate good, is basically pleasure; is good regardless however the good was achieved. Kant believes that the action of duty has moral worth and if we were to avoid the doubt and have the lack of belief of our ethics, it must be rational based, unconditional.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is this good for others? The moral by contrast, focuses on actions or on the time to act. Thus, ethics is the reflective act before the action and moral is the right action ethically good. Categorical Imperative for Kant’s Deontology ethics is all that is imposed, that prevails over the rest because is what we have to do, not what we want to do. The imperative is to stick to the rule when we have to take a position on something.…

    • 3463 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Normative theories of ethics are meant to assist in the discovery of what is right and wrong. These moral theories rely on principles that determine whether an action is right or wrong. Some normative theories include utilitarianism, virtue ethics, W.D. Ross’s intuitonism, the categorical imperative, or deontology. Ethics is often used interchangeably with morality so it is not too surprising to learn ethics addresses questions of morality in philosophy.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To conclude, this paper had the purpose of discuss, compare and contrast utilitarianism’s and Kant’s respective theories. Such theories consist on the characteristics one must have in order to be a member of the moral community. We conclude that for Kant’s view one must have autonomy and be rational. Also, we study the utilitarianism view in which one is member of the moral sphere if is capable to…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, “The Greatest Happiness Principle”, is well known as a utilitarian, who stress the greatest happiness for the greatest amount. While they may have disagreed about what makes an action ethical, Kant and Mill are both extremely significant philosophers. Further acknowledgement of the contrasting…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In difficult times when the moral implications of one’s actions are unclear, ethical theories serve as a roadmap, guiding our moral compass and making more informed decisions. Two strongly opposing ethical theories which attempt to access the moral nature of individuals and their actions, are utilitarianism and kantian ethics. Founded by Jeremy Bentham, a 19th century social reformer and English philosopher, utilitarianism is a teleological ethical theory which focuses on the consequences of an action when judging its morality. The primary goal of utilitarianism is to maximize happiness for the greatest number of people. Therefore, in order to determine if an action is morally right or wrong we must predict the amount of happiness it will…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays