They were highly artistic and professional and I expected nothing less from someone whose gallery was one, if not the busiest when I visited the city. Looking back at the photos I took, her Instagram, and homepage, I found a pattern with the way she draws especially the features of her lady subject. On one hand, it feels empowering to see beautiful women who are not as objectified and seen beneath men. They weren’t mere eye-candies to attract men and quench their thirst, but real genuine and respected subjects. However, on the other hand, they unfortunately support the ideal beauty standards propagate by the media. Maybe it wasn’t what she wanted, but it was what I took and many others like my friends from abroad who were repeatedly fed by media that white, tall, slender, small face, high nose etc., should be the standards of desirability. Arts is also a form of communication that delivers to viewers what is beautiful, especially when they are that pricey. As Kilbourne said, it tells us how to and what to look like. Moreover, Rapp’s work also supports the social construction of gender that a many group of people is trying to overcome. It’s like a one step forward, two step back process that sometimes well-minded people commit. She said that through her work, she’s telling us the fluidity of femininity, but when you only have one type of woman portrayed, as described above, it loses and negates the “trying to change/ combat female stereotype effect”. Unsurprisingly, people who paid a visit to her exhibition were mostly adults. I can only imagine what they were thinking while staring and ingesting the pieces. Maybe some women were thinking along the lines of “I should look like that. I want to look like that”. Meanwhile, another would be annoyed that she empowers conventional female patterns. Other (shallow) men may find the paintings alluring and bewitching and start looking for women who only bears resemblance to those or worse, closet sexist
They were highly artistic and professional and I expected nothing less from someone whose gallery was one, if not the busiest when I visited the city. Looking back at the photos I took, her Instagram, and homepage, I found a pattern with the way she draws especially the features of her lady subject. On one hand, it feels empowering to see beautiful women who are not as objectified and seen beneath men. They weren’t mere eye-candies to attract men and quench their thirst, but real genuine and respected subjects. However, on the other hand, they unfortunately support the ideal beauty standards propagate by the media. Maybe it wasn’t what she wanted, but it was what I took and many others like my friends from abroad who were repeatedly fed by media that white, tall, slender, small face, high nose etc., should be the standards of desirability. Arts is also a form of communication that delivers to viewers what is beautiful, especially when they are that pricey. As Kilbourne said, it tells us how to and what to look like. Moreover, Rapp’s work also supports the social construction of gender that a many group of people is trying to overcome. It’s like a one step forward, two step back process that sometimes well-minded people commit. She said that through her work, she’s telling us the fluidity of femininity, but when you only have one type of woman portrayed, as described above, it loses and negates the “trying to change/ combat female stereotype effect”. Unsurprisingly, people who paid a visit to her exhibition were mostly adults. I can only imagine what they were thinking while staring and ingesting the pieces. Maybe some women were thinking along the lines of “I should look like that. I want to look like that”. Meanwhile, another would be annoyed that she empowers conventional female patterns. Other (shallow) men may find the paintings alluring and bewitching and start looking for women who only bears resemblance to those or worse, closet sexist