Constitutional Convention And Conventions In The New Zealand Government

Improved Essays
The Executive in New Zealand Government is demonstrably where all the real political power is to be found. Constitutional conventions and statues have over time evolved and been implemented in order to help restrain the Executive and ultimately prevent the Executive from becoming too dominant in New Zealand government. Whilst constitutional conventions and statutes are distinct and separate they both play a vital role and are essential for effective restraint and neither one it can be argued is more important than the other. This essay endeavors to cover and effectively justify why both constitutional conventions and statutes are as said above are equally important although in different situations. However if they work interdependently then …show more content…
It is the supreme form of law and is all the law made by Parliament. Parliaments main source of power derives from the weight of legislation, without legislation parliament would lose a great deal of authority and power. Statutes provide structure and rules for the ongoing stability of the general public. In New Zealand everyone is subject to the law and all are equal before the law, so therefore parliament is subject to their own laws which stops them from making any extremist decisions because they are also still obliged to follow the laws they wish to make. Constitutional conventions although not judicially enforced and not in written format, is still a important aspect in New Zealand 's legal system “government without a constitution is power without right”. They outline serve integral function in allowing flexible and easy constitutional …show more content…
An example of this being put in place is 'Fitzgerald and Muldoon '. In late 1975, Muldoon released a press statement stating that the government would no longer enforce the Superannuation Act 1974. Muldoon was checked through judicial review, Chief Justice Richard Wild held that only parliament could repeal legislation. Muldoon had breached section 1 of the Bill Of Rights Act 1688 “that the pretended power of suspending of laws or the execution by Regall Authority without consent of parliament is illegal”. This implemented the significance of parliamentary supremacy in New Zealand, the executive are not able to disregard statutes. Another import statute was the Electoral Referendum Act 1993 proposed the introduction of MMP, the pressure of multi-party government under MMP has imposed a significant restraint on executive power it decreases likelihood to pass controversial or unpopular policies quite as easy as was happening pre MMP. MMP government are capable of controlling parliamentary outcomes, as evidenced by their successes on confidence motions, annual budgets, and the enactment of large numbers of government Bills within each term of Parliament. However, their ability to do these things is dependent on cooperation between coalition parties and weather they are willing to compromise with their cooperating party. Thus the restraint that MMP imposes on executive power. Another tool

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Constitutional Convention took place on May 14, 1787. In the Convention 55 individuals all responded except for New Hampshire that didn't show up until July, and Rhode Island didn’t show up at all. In the existing Constitution the Articles of Confederation weren’t working, there was no chief executive, no court system, not even a way for the central government to force a state to pay taxes. Tyranny is the thought that absolute power is in the hands of one individual- like a dictator or king. They wanted to see how the Constitution guarded against tyranny.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The supreme legal authority in the United Kingdom is in the hands of the parliament. In the traditional view of parliament is…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When the elected branches have decided on a course of action-even on controversial issues-they usually prevail. However, the absence of enforcement authority has allowed Congress and the president at times to ignore Supreme Court rulings. Presidents realize that Congress is more willing to relax control when it knows it can easily reassert its preferences if it disagrees with the bureaucracy’s implementation of a policy. By continuing to honor these statutory provisions, designed to create more flexible principal-agency relations, the elected branches have colluded informally to “overrule” the Supreme Court’s verdict on the unconstitutionality of the legislative veto. Several provisions of the Constitution equip Congress and the president with the power to rein in the Supreme Court when they disagree with its decisions.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Four years after the Revolutionary War the Constitutional Convention starts. 55 state delegates meet in Philadelphia to fix the Articles of Confederation. After many hardships between the states the Constitution of the United States of America is born. I think the Constitutional Convention is the most significant event because it gave us our freedom.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitutional Framers

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the Constitutional Convention, when the framers took up the charge of creating the document that would see the newly formed nation into an ambiguous future they were met with a lengthy list of challenges. If the document they created was not definitive and resilient it would not endure. It had to be more than just a guide to the way Americans should behave towards one another, it also had ensure that one’s chosen to lead could not abuse the authority given to them at the expense of the people. For the purposes of this paper we will focus on representation, excessive democracy and governmental oversight.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A Constitutional Convention was called in Philadelphia Pennsylvania earlier this month to address problems in the governing of the United States of America, and to revise the Articles of Confederation. Debates included arguments over representation in Congress, slavery, and the new executive branch. The purpose of this convention was to create a better government, and word has it that they have concluded the convention with the agreement of establishing a United States Constitution. The people who attended the convention were the educated and wealthy elite.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The New Constitution By the year 1786 our nation became aware that the current constitution, the Articles of Confederation needed to be changed or our country was going to fail. The Articles gave Congress virtually no power to regulate domestic affairs--no power to tax, no power to regulate commerce. Congress had to depend on financial contributions from the states, and they often time turned down requests. In 1786, the United States was bankrupt (The Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Pennsylvania). The debate lasted one hundred days and took place from May 14, 1787 to September 17, 1787.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will discuss why the Australian Constitution has separated the legislative, executive and judicial powers. The separation of powers is about preserving our freedom as enshrined in the Australian Constitution. The history of the separation of powers theory will be discussed, also there will be references to weekly reading materials and weekly tasks. Argued will be that the reasoning behind the separation of power is to ensure that no branch of government or an individual has sole power of the government and the country with the checks and balances system being vital to ensure the former statement. Governmental Powers Described In order to understand why we separate the legislative, executive and judicial powers in the Australian…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    America needed to build a stronger government. They held convention for all 13 states to go to because people thought the Articles of Confederation weren’t strong enough. When the convention started the delegates came up with so many ideas it was like Articles of Confederation were not ever created. Many delegates went to the convention including James Madison, Ben Franklin, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, Edmund Randolph, Governor Morris, Rufas King, Rodger Sherman, and John Jay.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the issue, how did you find out about it, and what sources did you use to research it? Earlier this year at the ALP National Conference, Labor leader Bill Shorten stated, “Let us make this the first decade where our head of state is one of us. We can be an Australian republic, with an Australian head of state.” (Ireland, 2015).…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human rights are rights entitled to everyone by birth. A list of inalienable human rights is included in the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948 (Int). Bill of rights is a declaration of human rights protection and guarantees usually issued by a national government. A bill of right usually comprised of an implementation of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1996 (Int) (ICCPR) into domestic law. ICCPR is a treaty between states to recognize civil and political rights of individuals.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The History of the Constitutional Convention In 1787, Congress realized that states governing themselves would leave the nation powerless when faced with another war. The United States had adopted the Articles of Confederation a decade prior, but the system wasn’t working. Each state was able to govern itself, and they didn’t have to abide by any regulations set by the federal government. The United States has a federalist government, meaning that the citizens are held to the laws of the state and the nation, but the federal government was left nearly powerless to enforce any type of authority. Congress had no way of being able to regulate commerce and no authority to emplace taxes.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A constitution is a body of rules for which the Government regulates a state. A constitution regulates the relationship between the state and its citizens, it is sometimes a document with the principle rules that structure the functions of the Government as in the US Constitution . Constitutional conventions are considered to be historical customs that will determine what happens in certain situations regarding the constitution, or as described by the Cabinet Manual as constitutional practices that are regarded as binding in operation but not in law.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is a summation of the fact that there is very broad overlap between the legislative and the executive in the UK constitution, as the two powers are closely entwined, often exercised by the same bodies. For instance, Government ministers are members of the executive who exercise a legislative function in Parliament and also when they make delegated legislation. The Prime Minister is a Member of Parliament and occupies a seat in the House of Commons, with a majority of his peers, thus the executive has a powerful influence in the legislative branch. From this, it is evident that a pure separation of powers is not an explicit feature of the UK constitution, and Walter Bagehot’s claim that there is a “nearly complete fusion, of the executive and legislative powers” holds true. However this should not mean that the UK constitution is inadequate and allows for tyrannical rule.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays